How Attitude Influences an Organization
An attitude can be defined as a positive or negative evaluation of people, objects, event, activities, ideas, or just about anything in person’s surrounding. Eagly and Chaiken, for example, define an attitude "a psychological tendency that is expressed by evaluating a particular entity with some degree of favor or disfavor." Though it is sometimes common to define an attitude as discrete emotion or affect toward an object, affect is generally understood to be distinct from attitude as a measure of favorability.
This definition of attitude allows for one 's evaluation of an attitude object to vary from extremely negative to extremely positive, but also admits that people can also be conflicted toward an object meaning that they might at different times express both positive and negative attitude toward the same object.
There is a famous saying, “Attitude is everything” While attitude might not really be “everything,” in many situations it is the single most significant determining factor of success. Although some attitudes are influenced by core values, it is an element in producing, at all levels in an organization, a quality product or service, and it is greatly influenced by numerous factors. Employee attitude about product, about work, about manager and about the company will pretty well determine the quality of the work.
Most attitudes are formed as person grows up. Childhood experiences, Teachers, friends , parents, etc. all influence people’s attitude. Once an attitude is formed, it’s pretty much the way a person will think about any subject. People vote, select a spouse, pick an institute and raise children based on their attitude. Attitudes are affected by repetitive messages, advertising, examples, training and communications.
Can we measure attitudes to determine their impact? The answer is yes. Many measurements and scales are used to examine attitudes. Attitudes can be difficult to measure because measurement is arbitrary, meaning people have to give
This definition of attitude allows for one 's evaluation of an attitude object to vary from extremely negative to extremely positive, but also admits that people can also be conflicted toward an object meaning that they might at different times express both positive and negative attitude toward the same object.
There is a famous saying, “Attitude is everything” While attitude might not really be “everything,” in many situations it is the single most significant determining factor of success. Although some attitudes are influenced by core values, it is an element in producing, at all levels in an organization, a quality product or service, and it is greatly influenced by numerous factors. Employee attitude about product, about work, about manager and about the company will pretty well determine the quality of the work.
Most attitudes are formed as person grows up. Childhood experiences, Teachers, friends , parents, etc. all influence people’s attitude. Once an attitude is formed, it’s pretty much the way a person will think about any subject. People vote, select a spouse, pick an institute and raise children based on their attitude. Attitudes are affected by repetitive messages, advertising, examples, training and communications.
Can we measure attitudes to determine their impact? The answer is yes. Many measurements and scales are used to examine attitudes. Attitudes can be difficult to measure because measurement is arbitrary, meaning people have to give
References: Arthur, Winfred, Jr. And Hart, Darren. (1990). Empirical Relationships Between Cognitive Ability and Computer Familiarity Baack, S., Brown, T. and Brown, J. (1991) Attitudes Toward Computers: Views of Older Adults Compared with Those of Younger Adults Burkhardt, Marlene E. (1994). Social Interaction Effects Following a Technological Change: A Longitudinal Investigation Coleman, J.S., Katz, E., & Menzel, H. (1966). Medical Innovation: a difussion study Davis, J.A., (1969). Group Performance. Reading, MA. Addison-Wesley. Gardner, Donald G., Dukes, Richard L. and Discenza, Richard. (1993). Griffith, Terri L. and Northcraft, Gregory B. (1996). Cognitive Elements in the Implementation of New Technology: Can Less Information Provide More Homans, G.C., (1950). The human group. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World. Koohang, Alex A. (1989). A Study of Attitudes Toward Computers: Anxiety, Confidence, Liking, and Perception of Usefulness Liden, Robert C. and Adams, Susan M. (1992). Technological Change: Its Effects on the Training and Performance of Older Employees Murrell, Audrey J. and Sprinkle, Jodi. (1993). The Impact of Negative Attitudes Toward Computers on Employees’ Satisfaction and Commitment Within a Small Newcomb, T.M., (1943). Personality and social change. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Niosi, Jorge. (1994). New Technology Policy and Social Innovations in the Firm. Ram, S. and Jung, Hyung-Shik. (1994). Innovativeness in Product Usage: A Comparison of Early Adoptors and Early Majority Rathus, Spencer and Nevid, Jeffery S. (1987). Psychology and the Challenges of Life Sacks, Colin, Bellisimo, Yolanda, and Mergendoller, John. (1993). Attitudes Toward Computers and Computer Use: The Issue of Gender Shani, A.B. and Sena, James A. (1994). Information Technology and Integration of Change: Sociotechnical System Approach Smither. Janan Al-Awar and Braun, Curt C. (1994). Technology and Older Adults: Factors Affesting the Adoption of Automatic Teller Machine Sprague, J. (1982). Is there a micro theory consistent with contextual analysis? In E Weick, Karl E. (1990). Technology as Equivoque: Sensemaking in New Technologies