Preview

How Democratic Was The Roman Republic

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
165 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Democratic Was The Roman Republic
The Roman Republic was rather democratic.The Romans were the start of a democracy, and we include many of their ideas today in the United States. They were democratic because they had a constitution two important elements including legislation, and the right for citizens to vote. The Romans still use the same concept as the government does nowadays, such as the magistrates, senate, and assemblies. The assemblies job was to pass legislation, which is the most important reason that Romans were democratic.
On the other hand, They weren’t a democracy because only men and free slaves were allowed to vote, but not the other half of the society such as women and slaves. In addition, they couldn’t vote to determine which candidate they officially


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the Information articles, “How Democratic was the Roman Republic?” written by Alan Ward shows the Roman Empire could not be considered democratic because the rome citizens have no likelihood of being able to cast their vote regularly, but a group of unrepresentative voters can easily dominate sovereign popular institution. So wishes of the people as a whole are not expressed.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han China Dbq Analysis

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Athens created a democracy that worked because Athens was small enough that they could have everyone come to the meetings and participate in the government. Also in Document 4 Pericles states that Athens is a true democracy because no one can be kept out of government because of their poverty or social standing. Also that in private dispute no one person will be favored over the other in front of the law. Han China had a rule of emperors instead of democracy because their civilization was so big they couldn’t have a council of all the people meet every couple of weeks to debate on the course of action Han China will take. Instead in China the emperor appointed officials to a district who in turn appointed some of their men to rule over smaller parts of the district to keep order in that district for the emperor. For another person to become the emperor he has to have the Mandate of heaven, for the man to have the Mandate of heaven the emperor has to present him to heaven and heaven decides if he is worthy through the peoples’ support or lack of…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Sallust stated, “Greed destroyed honor, honesty and taught men to be arrogant and cruel. Ambition made men false. Rome changed.” The Roman Republic was critically weakened between 78 and 49 BC. The underlying flaws within the structure of the Senate and the republic itself, political corruption and violence and the formation of the first triumvirate, which should not have been permitted under the democratic state, all contributed to its decline. Manipulating these decaying social and political conditions were significant individuals, who, despite the efforts of the senate, rose to prominence and power, which culminated in Civil war.…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Romans began a republic which had a 2 consuls, a senate, assemblies, and officials. The consuls were similar to modern day presidents but stayed in office for only a year. The Senate led religious events and foreign policy. It also was in control of the revenue. Roman senate consisted of the wealthy men. The assemblies were created so the people other than the wealthy could have their say in the government. However the people in the assemblies had to be full citizen males, meaning no foreigners or slaves. Roman republic officials did have decent authority but there laws were made to ensure they did not get too much power, leaving more of it to the wealthy. Rome was also centralized, because of its location and saw many migrations and invasions, from Po River people and those in Sicily. At 44 B.C. Rome became an empire, led by an emperor, with senators, advisers, and of course the massive army. Over time, the Roman army became more and more powerful. When Romans would conquer and expand they would normally devastate that area. Eventually, Rome became a military monarchy. Rome then split its empire in two, having a emperor in the west, and another in the east.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Democracy is a type of government that is meant to give power to the people and give them control over their government and allow their voice to be heard. The democracy in Greece was incredibly direct, citizens could vote on each individual thing, however to be qualified as a citizen you had to be a male born of Athenian parents, all citizens could hold positions of power and their roles were chosen based on chance. As a citizen you were able to participate in votes and your voice was heard giving you a great impact on the government, however the requirements for citizenship caused people who were not citizens to have little say, for them the votes weren’t democratic. Unlike Greece, Rome had a representative democracy, the citizens of Rome, both plebeians and patricians could vote on who they wanted to represent them, however only patricians could hold positions of power. The Roman republic had three tiers, patricians could hold positions in all three, while it took many years for Plebeians to be able to hold all the positions of power. When we consider democracy to be based based on the say of the people, Rome was more democratic compared to Greece.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Instead, they favored a republic, a government in which citizens rule through their elected representatives…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a democracy, people choose their leaders by voting, and everyone is treated equally. Democracy revolves around rule by the majority. In my opinion, colonial America was on its way to democracy, but far from being a true democratic society. Only a small portion of the people were able to make the decisions, so government did not revolve around the majority.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The traditional dates for the Roman Republic are 509 to 27 B.C. The latter part of this period from 133 to 27 B.C. is known as the late Republic. It is also known as the Roman Revolution. The result of this revolution was the emergence of the Roman Empire and the catalyst has traditionally been linked to a single Roman citizen called Tiberius Gracchus. The wake of his brief political career left Rome much different than it had been. Like a crack in the wall of a dam, Tiberius revealed a weakness in the Roman system of government that would soon spider out of control until it could no longer hold back the deluge of the building political tension. What was this weakness?…

    • 2567 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Roman Government

    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages

    What Influence did Gaius Julius Caesar and Augustus have on the reforms of the government from a Republic to an Empire?…

    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Democracy is defined as rule by the people, either exercised directly or through elected representatives. Politically, being a democracy basically means the people have a say in government. A democratic person would typically believe in voting rights for all adults, the right to run for political office, freedom of speech, majority rule, and so on. Andrew Jackson is the main political leader connected so often with this type of government, and he’s said to be the founder of the Democratic Party, but he certainly was not democratic in all circumstances. The political and economic aspects were fairly democratic, although could be undemocratic as well, but his Native American policies did not show democracy whatsoever.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (Document D) This precisely states that Ancient Athens was a truly democratic in a sense, but still is run by the male citizens. Today's democracy in America is run by representatives of the people, in fact today’s democracy is run by all citizens over the age of eighteen. Athenian demokratia is run by male citizens, and are essentially their own representatives.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    tried to build a more solid senate but failed to take power away from the…

    • 2425 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Democracy Dbq

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although they were more un-democratic they did show basic signs of democracy. During the time of Athenian democracy Pericles was one of the major rulers. He said that they were a model for the entire world to follow because power was for the many rather then the few (Doc 5). One should proceed with caution while absorbing this information because these words were said during a funeral service. He might of exaggerated so they can make the families of the dead feel pride, and that there family members didn’t die in vain. This Society was also considered a direct democracy were citizens vote on issues. One example of this was when the citizens voted on ostracism of others in the societies. They voted to ostracize people when they felt they were acting toward the promotion of tyranny also promoting democracy.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Democracy in Colonial America which was a work in progress, had both democratic and undemocratic features. When colonist got to America, they had to make their own laws. They immigrated to America to get away from England’s laws. Not all of the new laws were great, they needed to make them better but never made laws, so didn’t know how to make them where it benefited everyone.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Democracy is basically known as power to the people, and the majority rule. Methods of electing presidential electors changed when Jackson started ruling. Even though more people were voting instead of legislative (DOC A), Natives were still not allowed to vote. The common people were universal-white-manhood which only benefitted them.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays