This is quite a view considering the barbaric, savage, animal-like descriptions Las Casas uses for the conquistators. He seems to ask, Who is the real savage here? Granted, this primary source only gives the position against the actions of the Spaniards and does not offer insight into the reasons or justification for their actions. Las Casas then refers to the Spaniards as “Christians”, and in the same sentence explains how these same “Christians” used and abused the native women and children, forcing them to work so the “Christians” could reap the rewards of their toil. The priest goes on to explain the gluttonous nature of these “Christians”: “what is enough for three households, of ten persons each, for a month, a Christian eats and destroys in one day.” Las Casas continues to describe what he witnessed in Hispaniola, the actions of the Spaniards getting worse, all the while still referring to the abusers as
This is quite a view considering the barbaric, savage, animal-like descriptions Las Casas uses for the conquistators. He seems to ask, Who is the real savage here? Granted, this primary source only gives the position against the actions of the Spaniards and does not offer insight into the reasons or justification for their actions. Las Casas then refers to the Spaniards as “Christians”, and in the same sentence explains how these same “Christians” used and abused the native women and children, forcing them to work so the “Christians” could reap the rewards of their toil. The priest goes on to explain the gluttonous nature of these “Christians”: “what is enough for three households, of ten persons each, for a month, a Christian eats and destroys in one day.” Las Casas continues to describe what he witnessed in Hispaniola, the actions of the Spaniards getting worse, all the while still referring to the abusers as