He felt that the poor laws increased dependency and poverty and they would increase the numbers of the poor than decrease them. Benjamin Franklin had four standpoints of criticism of the poor laws. His first stance was that everyone did not work for pleasure but for necessity and the poor laws created a security for "idleness" (Williams, 1994, p 83). His second standpoint was that everyone was responsible for their own economic welfare and providing aid would destroy initiative. His third argument states that "idleness, dependence, and vice" are created in the working class by public aid to the poor. Lastly his final stand was that the rich benefit the from poor in the need for their labor (Williams, 1994, p. 86). He suggested that if the poor laws were appealed this would help to increase the industry of the individual by forcing the poor to provide for themselves and in turn this would make the poor be happier (Williams, 1994, p.
He felt that the poor laws increased dependency and poverty and they would increase the numbers of the poor than decrease them. Benjamin Franklin had four standpoints of criticism of the poor laws. His first stance was that everyone did not work for pleasure but for necessity and the poor laws created a security for "idleness" (Williams, 1994, p 83). His second standpoint was that everyone was responsible for their own economic welfare and providing aid would destroy initiative. His third argument states that "idleness, dependence, and vice" are created in the working class by public aid to the poor. Lastly his final stand was that the rich benefit the from poor in the need for their labor (Williams, 1994, p. 86). He suggested that if the poor laws were appealed this would help to increase the industry of the individual by forcing the poor to provide for themselves and in turn this would make the poor be happier (Williams, 1994, p.