Preview

How Did Bolshevik Defeat Their Opponents

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1460 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Bolshevik Defeat Their Opponents
‘The Bolsheviks were able to defeat their opponents in the Civil War 1918-1921 because of Trotsky’s military leadership.’ Explain why you agree or disagree with this view.

During the Russian Civil War (1918-1921) the Bolsheviks, or the Reds, encountered opposition from the Whites, Greens and Blues in the attempt to consolidate their power and take full control of Russia after their seizure of power in October 1917. The new Bolshevik government was not democratically elected; after they seized power, Lenin dissolved the constituent assembly after the Social Revolutionaries gained the most votes and won 370 seats compared to the Bolshevik’s 175 seats. Unsurprisingly, a resistance to Lenin’s control emerged and intensified into a counter-revolutionary movement, resulting in Civil War. Trotsky, as a great leader and commander, was a fundamental factor for the Bolshevik victory of the Civil War. Trotsky was Russia’s war commissar; he had immense control and authority over the military, coinciding
…show more content…
However, the weaknesses of the Bolshevik’s opposition cannot be ignored alongside other Red Strengths.

Trotsky’s transformation of the Red Army, installing discipline and widespread use of propaganda are aspects of his great leadership which were instrumental in the Bolshevik victory of the Civil War. The Red army became a well-discipled fighting force under Trotsky’s leadership. Lenin had given Trotsky a free hand to control the Red Army which contributed to their victory. Despite critics, like historian and former Red Army General Dmitri Volkogonov, having argued Trotsky was poor at conducting true strategic military decisions, he was able to create, organise and inspire a brutal, loyal, disciplined Red Army whom were able to defeat their opponents at Civil War. Though conscription the Bolsheviks had increased from 200,000 men in October 1917

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The personalities of each individual contender played a role in establishing their position and reputation within the Party, which ultimately would strengthen or weaken their chances of becoming leader. Trotsky was a passionate member of the party and had the strongest Revolutionary record amongst all of his opponents. His leadership of the Red Army allowed the communists to seize power in the October Revolution, enhancing his reputation, despite being labeled a traitor when he sided with the Mensheviks in 1903. However, he was noted as ‘arrogant’ in Lenin’s testament and managed to gain many enemies within the party as he felt there was no need to endear himself to his colleagues and he therefore displayed little respect towards them. This made him very unpopular and a tyrant to compromise with as he believed in debate as a way of solving issues and adopted other western ideas, tainting his image. Similarly, Kamenev, Zinoviev and Rykov allowed their unfavorable personalities to ruin their appeal within the party and all were criticised in Lenin’s testament, further diminishing their chances of success. Stalin also…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trotsky however was the complete opposite to Stalin. He was popular, an orator and a talented theorist who stirred loyalty in his troops. His radical ideas made him well-liked with the young and idealistic members of the communist party. Lenin in his testament identified Trotsky as a “the most able in the present communist committee” he also remarked on Trotsky’s “too far reaching self-confidence”…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1922, when Vladimir Lenin died, someone needed to step up and the Soviet Union. As he was slowly dying, a power struggle emerged between Leon Trotsky, and Joseph Stalin. Even though Trotsky “had been widely viewed as the heir of Lenin, it was relatively easy for Stalin to combine with the other Bolshevik leaders in order to head off this threat” (Paley 10). In Lenin’s “Final Testament”, Lenin could already see that Stalin was quickly and surreptitiously gaining power. Stalin’s position of General Secretary gave him the ability to appoint people to important positions. Lenin was also reluctant to see Stalin as his successor because he thought that Trotsky could do a much better job. Lenin believed that Trotsky was the best man in the central…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After the October Coup in 1917, the Bolshevik’s power as the government of Russia was not completely solidified. This was mainly due to the vast opposition that the Bolsheviks experienced from all over Russia along with other pressing issues such as food shortages, an exhausting war, and a crippled economy. Yet the Bolsheviks not only survived the early day‘s of empowerment but went on to rule Russia for the next 70 years. This essay will examine the factors that allowed the Bolsheviks to have such a sweeping success in ruling Russia.…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The different beliefs in the revolution, this was a big part in the struggle as they all had different beliefs on how Russia would revolt and go into a new stage for Russia. Trotsky had his belief, this was of world revolution. Meaning that Trotsky didn’t believe that Russia could have a revolution on its own, as no socialist society could survive on its own. He didn’t believe that Russia had the economic resources or technological sophistication to complete the transition to socialism on its own. This meant that Trotsky relied on Western Europe and that they would have a revolution, he believed that the communist regimes in western…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Trotsky was the reason as to how the Bolsheviks gained so much power as he insisted on using ex-tsarist officers to train and control the red army. He used strict discipline in order to help the army and this greatly supported the Bolsheviks and helped them win the civil war. Trotsky also was the reason as to how the civil war was won, because not only did he recruit trained army officers- which was extremely difficult to do due considering most supported the whites- but also because he organized food and weaponry (8) and forced the red army to attack the Kronstadt sailors across melting ice, ruthlessly stooping the result and putting an end to the civil war. In other words, he won the civil war virtually single handed. This was one of the main reasons as to how the Bolsheviks consolidated their power and without the training of the army commanded by Trotsky, they wouldn’t have had the chance to be noticed. Furthermore, without Trotsky’s harsh commands and the declaration of “war is the instrument of policy” the civil war would’ve carried on, destroying the Bolshevik party and everything they had worked…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Bolsheviks consolidated their power after October 1917 however they faced many severe problems which made keeping their power complex. For Lenin and the Bolsheviks winning political power was relatively easy compared with retaining it. The Bolsheviks may have had a temporary majority in the All-Russia soviet in October 1917, but they did not have a majority following in the country as a whole . Russia was in chaos, politically and economically, and normal government had broken down in large areas. . yet lenin was able to overcome these problems and hold ontopower to create the world first communist state. The Bolsheviks overcame these problems by use of violence in the form of repression, and violence in war communism and the red army during the civil war however violence against their opponents was not their only strategy, Lenin also put forward policies of reform which showed that they were willing to compromise their principles to keep hold of power when faced with early problems and after the outbreak of the civil war the disunity of the opposition and the geographical and organisational factors were key factors which helped the Bolsheviks consolidate their grip on power.…

    • 1978 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On 24th October 1917 the Lenin and the Bolsheviks led a revolution in Russia. The Bolshevik Red Guards led a revolution against the Provisional Government by seizing control of stations, telephone exchanges, post offices, the national bank and the Winter Palace in Petrograd. Now Lenin set about creating the world’s first communist state. Although he was a strong influence, he was not solely responsible for the outbreak of revolution. There are other important causes of the Bolshevik seizure of power, such as the weakness of the Provisional government and Kerensky’s mistakes. Also other important factor was the actions of Trotsky and the timing and luck of the Bolsheviks. However, Lenin was, to a large extent, crucial to the Bolshevik seizure of power because he presented his April thesis, which gave the people of Russia an awakening to the communist aim.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    With particular reference to the quotation below and the views of at least TWO historians, evaluate Trotsky’s role in the Soviet Union in the period 1896-1940.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin - History

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Even though Stalin’s victory in the power struggle was partly due to his popular policies, it was not just this that allowed Stalin also because of the mistakes made by other rivals and factors that played into his hands. For example Trotsky was a former menshevik which helped Stalin accuse him of not been a true Bolshevik.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most important reason why the Bolsheviks were able to take over power was the faults and mistakes of the Provisional Government. A key factor was ‘Order No. 1’ which gave the Soviet control over the armed forcesand communications in Petrograd, and stated that the Provisional Government couldn’t pass any laws without the Soviet’s permission. This meant that the Provisional Government were lacking in power and couldn’t govern effectively right from the start which meant that people were dissatisfied. Also the Provisional Government hesitated when it came to important decisions such as the war and the…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Legislative Branch consists of the Senate and the House of Representatives, which is called “Congress.” The Legislative Branch (Congress) alone has the power to declare war and make laws. The House of Representatives has specific powers the Senate does not, including the power to impeach government officials, impose revenue bills, and to elect the President in the event of a tie in the Electoral College. The Senate also has exclusive powers, including the power to ratify treaties and accept appointments made by the President. However, these powers are limited in that the House of Representatives must also approve the appointment of the Vice President and any treaty that concerns foreign trade. Recently, the Senate has confirmed many Cabinet appointments made by President Trump. This includes Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, Attorney General Jeff Sessions, and Secretary of Defense James Mattis.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Infants have their infancy; adults, adultery.” ― David Philip Barash. In her story “The Storm” Kate Chopin not only creates the perfect environment for an adulterous affair but also uses the plot as a symbol of the affair. The story takes place in late 1800’s or early 1900’s. The story is about the extramarital affair between Calixta, mother of a young boy Bibi and wife to Bobinot, and Alcee, husband to Clarisse, during a horrific storm. The storm in this story is not just coincidental. It’s actually the motivation behind the story and the affair between Calixta and Alcee. The affair and the story begins, climaxes and ends just as the storm does.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In fact, Trotski is quoted saying “We have not organised the revolution to kill”(Spartacus). However, there were too many groups trying to destroy the Bolsheviks. This forced Vladimir Lenin to create the “Extraordinary Commission for the Suppression of the Counter-Revolution” also known as the Cheka; A secret police force. While the creation of this group was Lenin’s idea, Trotsky was put in charge, and repeatedly eliminated numerous enemies of the revolution. This was Trotsky’s first step in winning the civil war. When the “Whites” attacked the Bolsheviks and started the Civil War, Lenin appointed Trotsky as the Commissar for War, and President of the Supreme War Council. Thus, Trotsky single handedly was responsible for the Bolsheviks victory in the Civil War after defeating all enemy threats with terror and fulfilling the head leadership roles he was appointed to. Trotsky was extremely valuable to the Bolsheviks due to the fact that without him, they would have lost the Civil War. Without Trotsky, there would have been no one suitable to fill his numerous positions in which he had to make hard decisions that conflicted with his personal morals and mastermind many of the Bolsheviks victories. In addition, the vicious, blunt leader rebuilt the Russian army with the help of the Red Guards and through a recruiting and training process which proved difficult due to the fact that most officers supported the “Whites”. Trotsky was single handedly responsible for increasing the amount of soldiers from 7,000 in March 1918 to 5 million in Sep 1920(Brown, 1990). Without the essential rassemblement of this army, Trotsky would have not had the fire power to order Red Guards to ruthlessly put down the revolt of the Kronstadt sailors in March of…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Understanding Management

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages

    * The attitudes and behaviors of leaders shape the conditions that determine how well employees can do their jobs; thus, leaders play a tremendous role in the organization’s success.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays