Preview

How Did Colonists React To The Boston Massacre

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
987 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Colonists React To The Boston Massacre
Eventually, these tensions erupted with the riot on King Street in March of 1770, where five colonists died. Military presence in Boston was the British government’s first reaction to the colonies’ rebellion that did not involve passage of a new piece of legislation, which showed that they thought they needed physical force to remind the colonies of who was in charge. The colonists’ reaction to the British government’s first use of military force in the colonies showed how protective colonists had become of their land and people. These events further entrenched Parliament’s view of out of line colonists that needed control and showed the negative emotions colonists harbored towards Parliament and the British military. The colonists’ distinct …show more content…
This act angered the colonists more than Parliament expected because they perceived this tax to force the purchase of British tea and led to another boycott of British tea. A few months after the tax passed, a group of Patriot men gathered and dumped 90,000 pounds of tea into Boston Harbor. Parliament saw this as an act of defiance against the crown, which angered them. However, Patriots viewed their actions as “absolutely and indispensably so. …there was no other Alternative but to destroy it or…[give] up the Principle of Taxation by Parliamentary Authority….” At this point, colonists assumed full responsibility for defending their rights against a government that, in their eyes, relentlessly taxed them and infringed upon their rights. Parliament, on other hand, viewed the dumping of the tea as direct rebellion against its authority and that of the monarch. The destruction of goods made the Patriots’ rebellion different from earlier ones, and that Patriots even destroyed trade goods showed how seriously colonists believed in their British natural rights and their willingness to defend those rights. The event also showed that colonists had enough confidence to in their political power to lead a forceful, direct rebellion against the Tea Act …show more content…
Fearing the loss of their rights, colonists in Massachusetts gathered and prepared to revolt against the British government. To keep control over the rebels, the Continental Congress assembled in September 1774 to figure out the best way to assert their position without resorting to war. Even at this point, independence was not the popular opinion; instead, delegates opted to form a Continental Association, which boycotted all trade with the British and attempted to avoid war. Through this act, colonists hoped to achieve reconciliation through economic boycotts rather than a declaration of war. The formation of a “national” legislative body showed the culmination of the colonists’ gradual assertion of political independence within the British Empire. This organization made economic decisions and acted as if the colonies were one sovereign state in conflict with another sovereign nation. Although complete independence from the empire was not the end goal, the creation of the Continental Congress showed how colonial and British views of government differed, further demonstrating the growing conflict between the colonies and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Stamp Act Dbq

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The colonists decided to fight back against them. So they dressed up as Indians and went on a British ship and threw all the tea in the harbor. “We then were ordered to open the hatches and take out all the chests of tea and throw them overboard and we immediately proceeded to execute his orders, first cutting and splitting the chests with our tomahawks, so as thoroughly to expose them to the effects of the water.” Document 4. All that tea they threw overboard was worth millions. Britain was very mad. The group of colonists that did this were called the sons of liberty. The sons of liberty were colonists who held secret meetings and acted against Britain. They took action because they were tired of being unlawfully taxed by…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Weeks later after the party, the tea was dumped into the harbor caused it to have a bad smell. The British had to shut down the Harbor until all 342 chests of the tea were paid off which was incorporated in the Intolerable acts. Other acts were also carried such as Massachusetts Government Act, the Administration of Justice Act, the Quartering Act, and the Quebec Act due to American colonists being more fed up with the British rule. The Boston Tea party was such a turning point that it sparked the birth of the American Revolution which began in Massachusetts on April 19,…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Tea Party was the culmination of a resistance movement throughout British America against the Tea Act, which had been passed by the British Parliament in 1773. Colonists objected to the Tea Act because they believed that it violated their rights as Englishmen to "No taxation without representation," that is, be taxed only by their own elected representatives and not by a British parliament in which they were not represented. Protesters had successfully prevented the unloading of taxed tea in three other colonies, but in Boston, embattled Royal Governor Thomas Hutchinson refused to allow the tea to be returned to Britain.…

    • 5532 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Boston, Massachusetts, the Sons of Liberty protested Parliament's passage of the Tea Act in 1773 by throwing tons of taxed tea into Boston Harbor, an act that came to be known as the Boston Tea Party. News of the event reached England in January 1774. Parliament responded with a series of acts that were intended to punish Boston for this illegal destruction of private property, restore British authority in Massachusetts, and otherwise reform colonial government in America.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Tea Act was repelled by the colonial boycott was effective the British had been hurt but kept tea act. On 1773 parliament passed the new Tea Act. Because tea was so popular they made a way to farm money off of it. Only the people who pay taxes would get the tea without the tax on the tea. If you didn't pay your taxes you would be paying the tax on tea. This enraged the colonial shippers and merchants.…

    • 80 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    7 Years War Dbq

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In order to pay off these debts, the British enforced taxes on the colonist. The following acts were placed on the colonists: Sugar Act, Stamp Act, Quartering Act, Townshend Act, and Tea Act. The Sugar Act placed a 35% tax on imported sugar and other items such as textiles, coffee, wines, and indigo. The Stamp Act placed a tax on all paper items such as legal documents, licenses, commercial contracts, newspapers, pamphlets, and playing cards. The colonists boycotted these goods in order to have the Stamp Act repealed. The Quartering Act was an indirect tax that required colonists to house, supply, and feed the British troops that were sent to protect the colonists. The Townshend Act is another indirect tax that was placed on the colonists. This act required a tax to be paid at the sea ports before the items reached colonial stores. The colonists began to boycott this act as well. Britain’s East India Tea Company was struggling as tons of tea sat in warehouses. Britain established the Tea Act to eliminate all imports of tea to Britain, and therefore tea prices were lowered. This was Britain’s way to attempt to deceive the colonists into paying a tax that they were trying to boycott. The colonist’s infuriation with the British led the Sons of Liberty to disguise themselves as the Mohawk Indians and poured forty-five tons of tea into the Boston Harbor.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Boston Tea Party Essay

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After the French and Indian war King George III and British Parliament had made a tax on tea to pay off the debts that resulted from the war. They figured people would much rather pay the tax than give up tea altogether. The colonists believed that was unfair, but there was another part to it. American colonists…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1773, The tea act was passed and granted the British east India company a monopoly on tea sales in the American colonies. The smuggling of tea grew rampant and was a lucrative business venture for American colonists, such as john Handcock and Samuel Adams… American colonists were outraged over the tea tax…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    December 6 ,1773 A group of colonist from Massachusetts dressed up as Indians dumped over 342 chests of tea into the Boston Harbor. It was a protest for the Tea Act of 1773 a act that placed a monopoly on Tea. The protest was organized by Samuel Adams with about 60 members of the Sons of Liberty the group that he also organized. The Coercive Acts closed Boston Harbor and established formal British military rule in Massachusetts.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1773 we took yet another blow to our economy and rights of representation when the British government passed the Tea Act. This allowed the East India Company to avoid the stop and taxes in Britain mandated by the Navigation Acts, making it very difficult for American merchants to compete with the low price of the imported tea. The government was attempting to trick Americans into accepting the tax on tea from the Revenue Act of 1767 by passing it off as the import tax from the Navigation Acts that was no longer required to be paid by the East India Company. The only way to make Parliament see how all of these policies were really affecting the colonies was to take a stronger stance than we did with the Gaspee. We threw all of the tea into the Boston Harbor, because being tricked by a government that is supposed to be representing us is a violation of our…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Sugar Act taxed all common goods such as sugar, lumber, animal skins, and whale bone. The colonists responded in a mild protest, but it was not a huge issue for most. The next act past was the Stamp Act. The stamp act highly taxed stamps and made it so every paper had to have a stamp. The colonist were very angry about this act so they rioted until the act was repealed. The next revolutionary act was the Townshend Acts. This taxed common goods such as paper, tea, paint, and glass. The colonists responded to this act by boycotting British goods. Eventually British government repealed all the taxes except for the one on tea. This was not good enough for the colonist, they wanted all the taxes destroyed. They acted on this by going out in the middle of the night and throwing in 342 crates of tea into the Boston Harbor. As a punishment British government passed the Intolerable acts. There was four laws included in this act, the Boston Port Act, Massachusetts Government Act, Administration of Justice Act, and the Quartering Act. In the Boston Port Act the Boston Port was closed until the people of Boston had payed for it all. This was very significant because that port was used to import food, the citizens would starve without it. The Massachusetts Government Act stated that all town meetings or…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As with the Stamp Act and other unpopular taxes, they were all voted in by Parliament, which was thousands of miles away, and the American colonists had no way to influence the law or speak out against it while it was being debated in government. So the colonists were angry. They wanted to do something else to let the British know about the unhappiness that the Tea Act was causing. Some people wanted to keep things nonviolent; others wanted bloodshed. The result was somewhere in the…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The colonists did not agree with being taxed without representation, they wanted virtual representation within the British Parliament. Britain’s greed formed a group called the Sons of Liberty, which twice attempted to hang men who worked under the British regimen. With all the tensions, the Tea Act came to light, and Americans began to form an idea that they could never be truly free under the powerful greedy hand of Great…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A major factor leading to the colonies’ rebellion against Britain was their discontent on being taxed without representation in British Parliament, the governing body that ratified taxes on the colonies. An example of how women assembled together to support the rebellion against Britain is shown by their protests against the Townshend Acts, taxes passed by Britain on certain goods, including tea. In the Boston Evening-Post on February 12, 1770, a colonial newspaper, a group of “[about] 300 women” announced their boycott of tea taxed by Britain: “At the time when our invaluable Rights and Privileges are [attacked] in a… most alarming [manner]... we will…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Boston Tea Party

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The incident that has been termed the Boston Tea Party occurred on December 16, 1773, when government officials in Boston refused to return three shiploads of taxed-imposed tea to Britain. A group of colonists boarded the ships in disguise and destroyed the tea by throwing it into Boston Harbor (BTPHS). The Tea Act of 1773 essentially allowed one of Britain’s greatest commercial interests of the day, The East India Company, a monopoly over tea imports to all British colonies. Due to increased competition from the Dutch and the already high tax the Crown placed on tea, the East India Company had a surplus of tea. The solution that King George III and Parliament came up with was to force this tea on the colony (Knollenberg 93). Basically, a captive market was created for British products by the British Government. There was fear amongst the colonists that this could extend to products other than tea. The colonists’ actions and the government reaction widened an already growing chasm between Crown and colonists (Larabee 106).…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays