How Did Fred Cutler Act Appropriately In Trying To Act As A Sponsor

. et 2 - question 4-6 : "The Invisible Sponsor"

4. Were A1 Zink’s actions that of someone trying to be an invisible sponsor?

It is evident in the case scenario were that one of someone trying to be an invisible sponsor. Invisible sponsors usually come out inactive and reluctant in making most of the decisions. They feel that making such critical decisions that affect the project may make them accountable for any resulting failure. Fred was devoted and always wanted to cooperate with AL-Zink as the project sponsor though AL-Zink seemed not interested. There are many instances that showed the intentions he wanted to act invisible. When the deal begins, AL-Zink was hesitant to decide on the schedule of the project. At long last, she unwillingly settles on cost option. The drama continues as AL-Zink refuses to respond to Fred’s emails to sign-off the schedule. Fred had to force him to perform most of the roles due to overlapping time. Up to this level, it is predictable that AL-Zink was avowing accountability.

5. Did Fred Cutler act appropriately in trying to get Al Zink to act as a sponsor?
It should be appreciated that Fred was active and devoted towards ensuring that the senior is up to the task. As a junior, he was devoted towards working as a team with the new employee. In some instances, AL-Zink would walk out in their meetings, but this did not discourage Fred. The decision to tell AL-Zink that the company usually considers the project sponsor as the overall factor as far as results of the project was concerned was ethical. Partners have the right to information so that they do not create excuses for their lack of accountability when a problem