Douglass writes in chapter three, “ The wife of Mr. Giles Hicks- murdered my wife's cousin, a girl between fifteen and sixteen years of age, mangling her person in the most horrible manner,” which in the eyes of abolitionists in 1845 and even today in 2015 produces the uttermost sympathy for a young girl who instead of having a long fulfilled life, had dealt with another woman “breaking her nose and breastbone with a stick, so that the poor girl expired in the few hours afterward.” In his narrative, Douglass chose an audience that would react in the right way to the experiences a slave commonly encountered. He carefully implemented sensitivity in dealing with another slaves difficult issues by choosing words such as “poor girl” in order to make his point without making an enemy. Douglass also understood that the use of language like “mangling” and “expired” would disgust any reader who also shared the same belief that people are not property and being black should not allow tolerance for unjustified …show more content…
On the very first page of Douglass’s narrative he states that “the white children could tell their ages. I could not tell why I ought to be deprived of the same privilege.” Douglass was kept ignorant of dates and was expected to only be concerned about harvesting time. As the novel continues and Douglass has a desire for education, he includes dates to show that he can prove himself to be an equal of a freed man. He invites any dissenter to check him of his dates and facts and that in general boots the credibility of his claim that with an education a black man can accomplish the same goals as any white man. By securing this equality with his audience, he is then able to tactfully evoke emotion and influence a need for change. By evoking emotion through word choice, Douglass was able to interpret his story so notably that the reader or audience felt pity for the slaves, and desired a