for
for
After World War I, many British colonies were ruling India, angering the natives and causing a sense of nationalism. Mahatma Gandhi took the matter into his own hands, using a surprising way to promote and fight for independence. Instead of being like many other revolutions and creating much…
One view presented by the sources is that Indians did not like the British rule. The theme of hostility is presented in Source 11, where Gandhi writes in 1920 that the British are “evilly manned”, using strong words such as “dishonest” and “unscrupulous”, suggesting strong feelings of hostility towards British rule, as Gandhi feels as though the British are almost cheating the Indian people “with no regard to the wishes of the Indian people”, meaning the British are doing what they want without consulting the people they are ruling over. This source shows that the hostility felt by Indians was in fact widespread because it is written by Gandhi, a man who represented and was supported by a variety of people from all classes. This theme of hostility towards British is corroborated in Source 10 where the British are described as “irresponsible” and, like in Source 11, the Indians feel their “rights of human beings are being denied”, showing that the Indians again felt that the British were doing as they pleased without Indian voices being heard. However, as the source is written by Motilal Nehru, leader of the INC, it is difficult to say from this source that hostility was in fact widespread – Nehru only represents the INC which has the high caste community as a significant majority, and as it is written in 1919, we cannot be sure if the hostility was long-lasting as it is the same year as the massacre itself.…
The short story “Clearing Paths to the Past” and the poem “To be of use” by Marge Piercy share a common theme. The common theme that both of these stories share is that sometimes you have to do things you do not want to for the well being of others or to carry on tradition. Piercy’s “To be of use” shows this theme because she tells the story of hardworking people who “jump into work head first and do what has to be done again, and again,” which shows that people do not want to do something but they do it because it has to be done. Similarly in the short story “Clearing Paths to the Past” this theme is conveyed through the story of a man who has to shovel snow off of a long sidewalk everyday so that the children who wait for the bus there do…
With many politicians believing the British were civilising the peoples of periphery, the British probably believed the peoples of the American colonies needed to be taught to respect the metropole, which believed it had a parent role. In contrast, in the Indian case acts of resistance had yield some success. It could, however, be argued that the war a make factor in this success. As Fieldhouse points out: Stafford Cripps promised India dominion status ‘to rally Indian opinion in the crisis caused by Japan’s entry into the war’ (Secondary Source 19.2, 2015, p.10). As well as the civil disobedience, which was part of the ‘Quit India’ campaign, the British were also concerned about the Japanese-back ‘Indian National Army’ who had have some military success. In this context, then, the British high likely perceived those whom taken in the civil disobedience as moderates. As Indian support was needed to fight Japan, the British probably felt placating moderates was a small price to pay considering the circumstances. Therefore, the circumstances of war played in a major factor in Indian progress towards…
By gathering the community together to support him and urging them to get arrested, he turned himself into a civil rights leader that the British government was unable to control. Essentially, their hands were tied. The government was unable to arrest Gandhi without causing more disobedience from the public and if they let him continue with his work, they would be allowing these illegal actions to take place on a national scale. The power that this gave Gandhi not only made him more powerful, but it allowed him to carry out the salt march to the highest extent to which he was capable of. By successfully completing the march, Britains power over the indian poeple was severely weakened, which played a large part in Indias eventual independence.…
Gandhi worked as a global non-violence leader for many years of his life. He used methods of non-violence to attempt to gain independence for India. India had always been a colony of Great Britain, but as its economy and population continued to boom, the movement for independence did as well. Gandhi became a leader for this movement. He helped ease tensions that could have erupted into severe violence, violence that could cause…
Mahatma Gandhi, Indian nationalist, and the man credited with liberating India from British rule led a campaign of non-violent, civil disobedience that made the continued stay in the country by the British colonizers politically and morally untenable. Imprisoned by the British for fomenting unrest, Gandhi confronted the colonizers’ force of arms with the power of his ideas, and the rightness of his cause, and by his act of courageous disobedience prevailed gloriously over the British in the end. Today, India is a vibrant democracy of 1.2 billion people, free because of the disobedience of one frail, unprepossessing man, Mahatma Gandhi.…
As he was “fighting” freedom for his country from the British Empire, India was struggling with the discrimination that they own caste system infringed over the ones denominated “untouchables”, which showed Gandhi and his movement as a double standard revolution.…
Peaceful protests are paramount in affecting change in a free society for a simple reason; those with power tend to keep it. Only through demonstration (or regulation) will they relinquish it. While this concentration of power is completely unjust, I don't blame the holders of it in the slightest. Although we humans are social creatures, we're nearly always out to ultimately better ourselves and carry on in our blissful ignorance that we aren't doing others any harm. This is where peaceful protests come in.…
The British were in control, but the people weren’t going to sit back and let it happen. This happened during the independence movement. This march began near the sea and the British monopoly on salt was one of the boldest act of civil disobedience yet against British rule in India. Gandhi would pray and speak his heart out to what was happening in his town. He wanted his followers to have some self-confidence to succeed in their struggle against the British.…
“Breaking News! Indian citizen Mohandas Gandhi is organizing a protest to reduce British taxes on salt, 36 years after he made a compromise with the South African government about Indian suffrage. This was accomplished by what Gandhi and what other Hinduist followers consider satyagraha; or civil disobedience.” I switched the small, tattered, black and white TV off. I was amazed how one leader could bring down a strong government with a big military force, just with civil disobedience. Ever since I was born, we were controlled over British colonial rule. My parents were forced to work as peasants, because all the high-paying jobs were taken by whites. Because of inaccessibility to medical assistance, my mom died. My father was so stricken with…
Gandhi was the leader of the Indian Independence movement in British ruled India. He resisted the government by using non-violent disobedience. You must keep in mind that the system that he lived in(British ruled India) was very organized and it was very hard to resist the governments laws. He used one of the most effective methods of gathering the people and controlling them to his will. For example when the people made revolts against the British government Gandhi would starve himself to get them to listen because the people really cared about him. This method can only work if the people really care about you. At 5:17 PM on 30 January 1948 Gandhi was assassinated by Nathuram Godse in the garden of the Birla house. In 1930 Mahatma Gandhi challenged the British government by ignoring the salt tax with a 400 km Salt…
In “Letter to viceroy” Gandhi states that, “I shall be running what might fairly be termed a mad risk.” This evidence shows that Gandhi also didn’t think it work about using nonviolence he thought it wasn’t enough to change the British’s point of view. This argument over the British government believes that nonviolence is not an active force because, it’s important to remember that Gandhi solved the problem without hurting one life while doing it, and also worked by the British getting rid of the…
The cruel treatment and salt monopoly inspired Gandhi to unify the people in “campaign of satyagraha, or mass civil disobedience.” Salt is a vital part of Indian diet recognized when the Salt Acts were enacted which put a “monopoly over the manufacture and sale of salt”. [1] Gandhi led nonviolent demonstrations as the people defied British policy by making salt from seawater. The British would soon respond by brutally beating the peaceful demonstrators bringing international outrage. By August 1947, Britain caved in to the pressure granting India its independence. Gandhi’s civil disobedience movement influenced India by putting it on the path to become the country we know today.[2] Detractors will say that the ends doesn’t justify the means. They claim that civil disobedience will set a standard for illegality and contempt for the law that others will follow. An example used occurred in 1999 in London where the ‘Carnival against Capitalism’ took place. What started as peaceful protest against economic policy devolved into “self-indulgent violence and destruction of property in the city, achieving nothing but notoriety for its cause.”[3] On the other hand if the law itself is unjust then the people should disobey in order to bring about the greater good not just for themselves but for future…
Mohandas Gandhi launched a policy of nonviolent noncooperation against the British following the Massacre at Amritsar in 1919 (Boss, 2012). He used his moral outrage guided by reason to effect change in the cultural norms of India and ultimately helped India gain independence in 1947. Gandhi’s efforts have greatly impacted social and political reform, and have influenced later civil rights movements.…