Preview

How Did Geographical Problems Make It Hard for the Tsar to Rule the Country?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
498 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Geographical Problems Make It Hard for the Tsar to Rule the Country?
Size Problems:
In the beginning of the twentieth century, Russia was an enormous empire that spanned the two continents of Europe and Asia. The USA could fit into Russia over two and a half times and Britain nearly a hundred times.
The size of Russia made many things difficult, such as communication, transport and trade. These things were difficult because there were very few paved roads. Most roads were hard-packed earth that would turn to mud in heavy rain and during the winter, the people had to travel by horse-drawn sleds. At best, travel by roads were slow, and other times roads were impassable.
Although there had been an enormous growth in railways in the 1890s, by 1900 Russia still didn't have that much track. Most of these tracks were in European Russia. It took more than a week to get from the west to the pacific coast.
Transportation being difficult caused a lack of proper communication, which lead to weak trade. Proper communication was very important in ruling a country because without it, laws and orders couldn't be passed and carried out. Weak trade would also make it hard for the Tsar to rule the country because Russia's economy would become less and less stable.

Agricultural Problems:

Although much of Russia's land was very beautiful and dramatic, little of it could be used for farming. The main agricultural areas were in European Russia where most people lived. Besides the lack of fertile land, there were short growing seasons, it was drought prone and erosion accelerated via snow melting.
The reason an insufficient amount of agricultural land would make ruling Russia more difficult was that poor harvests would cause serious issues of starvation, which would then lead to outbreaks of protests, violence and rebellion by the famished people.

Political Problem:

Tsar Nicholas was an autocrat that believed he had a divine right to rule- that he was chosen by god. He could, and did do whatever he wanted without consulting anyone.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    I think that Russia was unrecognisable in 1894 compared to what it was in 1881 when it was inherited by Alexander III. Alexander III had changed many things from when he came into power and still remained when he had died in 1894.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As we know The Russian empire under the czar (or царь in Russian) was the…

    • 2269 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another factor that was responsible for the survival of the Tsarist rule was the reluctance of the Peasantry to support opposition. The Peasants were extremely uneducated and they didn’t understand how these policies could change their lives. The Tsar had been the political power since the 13th century so it was all that they knew. They believed that the Tsar was appointed by god so whatever he did, they believed it was for the best. They were fearful that if they joined an opposition group the Tsar would be able to ‘see’ them and…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The autocratic rulership and repressive policies promoted the feudalistic style class system and prevented societal advancements throughout Russia. The world was entering a…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many of the opposition fled to other European countries where they continued to plot against the Tsar. This shows how Alexander lll had caused Russia to go back in progress politically by exiling all of their possible contenders. This allowed the Tsar to have much more control over Russia much like before Alexander ll reign. The persecution of Jews caused many to join radical parties and organisations. This shows us how there was not even the slightest bit of democracy within Russia, and how Alexander lll had caused Russia to go back in progress. Another major problem in Russia was the growing population of peasants. This caused famines within Russia in 1892 and 1893. This famine was a cause of many peasants death which shows how Russia did not have the money or resources to keep up with their growing population. This showed a lack in progress as they could not even support their country’s people with…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russia, under the reign of the young Tsar Peter, was westernized and modernized almost in the wink of an eye. Peter the Great visited Europe, and worked hard to learn and bring back every bit of technology and wisdom possessed by the western part of the world. Throughout his reign he brought Russia up from the proverbial dumps, and placed it among the world powers throughout the known world. Not only did he use his intelligence and determination to put Russia in this position, but also his natural ability to command and lead armies into battle.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    27

    • 610 Words
    • 4 Pages

    power when they were freed. This created a larger system of agriculture of Russia, but…

    • 610 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It had basically been an agricultural society with an autocracy and a serfdom who worked for landowners, making money exporting grain. These landowners were not in favor of governmental reforms that would alter their lucrative lifestyle. This kept the Tsar from implementing meaningful reforms and spending capital on industrial projects. The loss in the Crimean War (1853-1856) revealed their weaknesses against more industrialized countries. Socialism, Liberalism, Nationalism, and Communism brought in conflicting philosophies that contradicted to the way most countries operated.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the 11th century, Russia converted eastern Slavs to Christianity and had loose but real political unification of the eastern Slavic territories. There was a typical feudal division of the land based on the peasantry and the nobility. Russia can be considered not “western”, especially between 1250 and 1700. Russia was conquered and subjugated by a foreign invader which created a rule basically unknown in the West. By the 1700’s absolute monarchy ruled by Peter the Great was very different from France and Prussia, making…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Tsarist Autocracy

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Due to Nicholas II’s failure to accomplish the citizen’s goals and to negotiate with them, the Russian Revolution began. Peasants struggled…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russia went from having 26 kilometers of railroad in 1840 to having 50,000 kilometers by the end of the century. This greatly helped the economy by encouraging trade and offering cheap transportation. They also aided the spread of knowledge, creating a more educated peasant class. Even so, the largest demand for the railroads came from merchants, entrepreneurs, and the elite. In the 1880’s the Transcaucasian Railway, which connects the Caspian Sea and the Black Sea and the Trans-Caspian Railway, which follows the Silk Road, were built.…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Previous to the Napoleonic Wars and Peter the Great's travels to the rest of Europe, Russia was a solitary county. They had no major allies, nor any major enemies (other than the occupying Mongols). The location provided safety, but it meant that any advancement by the peoples around them would go unnoticed, and ultimately they lagged behind.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One reason Russia was difficult to govern was because of the size and diversity of it. As the country was so large, and covered almost 23 million square kilometres in 1900, this made it very difficult to govern as it made it difficult for the Tsar to have complete control of a place that was more than 20 square kilometres away. The empire stretched across two continents which meant that millions of the emperor’s subjects had to travel very far to get the other side of Russia. The size of the country also meant that there were many different nationalities and languages within the empire, hundreds in fact. This also made it hard to govern Russia as the people had different opinions on what the empire should be like and so Many resented being dominated by the Russians as they did not agree with the Russian way of ruling. It also meant that an emperor living on the western side of Russia had to ensure he was being obeyed 3,000 miles away which was very difficult. The size of the emperor was one of the main contributions to the difficulty of governing Russia because it also caused a huge difficulty with transport and communication. The terrain was almost impossible to travel across as in the north there was the tundra, with is permanently frozen subsoil which made communication very difficult and almost impossible in winter. There was also the deep woods and forests which meant that very little of the land was suitable for cultivation or transport which made it difficult for the emperor to make sure he was being obeyed on the other side of the country. There were then the deserts which were even more difficult to travel across meaning it was more difficult to govern the wide diversity of the…

    • 1851 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Salient Era

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Railroads have already been around for twenty years, but by 1850 there are more than nine thousand miles of track (“Railroads” 1). The eastern side of the United States has already been adopting railroads as their main source of transportation. States such as New York, Philadelphia, and Michigan have interconnected their railroads they had specifically only in their states. Chicago then joined the new trend having a connection of railroads from the east. These railroads reached all the way to the Mississippi (1). Once the Civil War broke out the, the Union shut of the railroad connection to the South which caused an increase in the railroad production west of the Mississippi and to the West Coast (4). The first transcontinental railroad was built by the government by land grants and loans. Later the production of the transcontinental railroad was built by two competing companies. The two companies finally met and connected their tracks on 1869 (4). Railroads during this era were also a big factor for both sides of the civil war. The locomotives transported troops, equipment, and even served as a purpose of communication (“Railroads Critical Role in the Civil War” 1). Railroads were highly valued during this time from all perspectives and…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mongol Rule

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Russia government was fragmented; it was ruled by princes of their own society. Russia was further…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics