The Missouri Compromise is transparently the catalyst for all other issues that had risen. In 1820, Washington decided on “a bundle of three compromises” led by Henry Clay. The primary of the three…
In 1820, Missouri was petitioning to become a slave state, however, the imbalance of power in the south was unthinkable. Henry Clay, Speaker of the House at that time, proposed what is known as the Missouri Compromise. It stated that any land north of the 36°30’ line would be considered “free” land. The compromise was meant to create a balance between slave…
The Compromise of 1850 eventually overturned the Missouri Compromise, when Texas applies for statehood after the Mexican-American War. Henry Clay, also known as “The Great Compromiser” allowed Texas to be declared a slave state, by writing this. To balance out the addition of a slave state to…
The 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act opened another battleground to the controversy. By leaving the slavery question up to popular sovereignty, Congress initiated a race between abolitionist and proslavery forces to control Kansas. Abolitionists encouraged free-soil advocates from New England and New York state to move to Kansas. Ministers like Henry Ward Beecher supported this emigration and encouraged their parishioners to help fund free-soil advocates. Meanwhile, proslavery forces urged slaveowners to relocate with their slaves. Southerners from Missouri and farther southeast made the move. The resulting conflict and bloodshed between the two groups earned the area the nickname Bleeding Kansas.4…
The Kansas- Nebraska Act was proposed by Stephen Douglas in 1854. This Act stated that the territory of Nebraska would be split into two separate territories, Nebraska and Kansas. It also stated the people could vote on whether the territories would have slavery. This Act caused a large controversy between the people in the North and the South of the United States.…
By this time, so many more Northerners had become opposed, morally, to slavery and had spoken out against. Many people were opposed to slavery because the white families had a very hard time competing against the inexpensive labor of the slaves and could not rise above to grasp what everyone wanted, the American dream. When the Kansas-Nebraska Act was put into place in the hopes that popular choice would make Kansas a slave state and Nebraska a free state which would maintain balance and would also organize even more territory coming in from the Louisiana Purchase in order to further the railroad construction. This conflict instigated dramatic change in addition to the change created by negating the Missouri Compromise Line. Because it repealed the Missouri Compromise in which slavery was not to expand north of the 36’30 line and also because many in Kansas were thoroughly against slavery, both morally, and for their financial well-being which led to the event known as Bleeding Kansas where bloodshed had become evident over the dispute, this change also involved the end of peaceful compromise. Those opposed to the spread of slavery like John Brown went to Kansas and killed pro-slavery Southerners. Those who thought the political strategy of popular sovereignty would maintain balance were proved wrong when the territory became chaotic.…
The Kansas-Nebraska Act created two new states, but they were voted upon using popular sovereignty. Rather than having them be free state and slave state by the Missouri Compromise, it was decided that the citizens would vote on it. This was known as popular sovereignty (voting on whether or not the state would be free or slave state), and people from the north and south came up to…
The Kansas-Nebraska act was a proposal by Sen. Stephen A. Douglas which said that Kansas and Nebraska territory could be allowed to govern for itself whether or not to be a slave state or a free state. By a vote of its residents the territories would become a slave or a free state.This caused many fights between Northerners and Southerners. As a result many people were killed.…
Of all the events that happened in the US before 1877, the one event that completely changed the course of history was the direct result of the Kansas Nebraska act i.e. Bleeding Kansas. The Kansas Nebraska act allowed for new territories to decide if they were a free or a slave sate by popular sovereignty. It undid the compromise that was made in Missouri compromise, which designated a line of latitude to be the separation of free and slave states. The Kansas Nebraska act re ignited the differences between pro and anti-slavery sections. Violent events and fighting had become so terrible that it had to be termed as “Bleeding Kansas”.…
The constitution of California outraged many southerners because the constitution banned the slavery. Henry Clay worked to make a compromise that would both satisfy the South and the North. With the support of Daniel Webster, a powerful senator of Massachusetts, Henry Clay presented to the Senate a series of resolutions later called The Compromise of 1850. In order to appease North, the compromise regulated that California be admitted to the Union as a free state. To please the South, the compromise proposed a new and more effective fugitive slave law. To appease both sides, there was a provision allowed the right to vote for or against slavery called popular sovereignty. Even though Henry Clay put great effort on the compromise, the…
To get the South in his favor, Douglas compromised with the South and introduced an act that would divide the remainder of the unoccupied Louisiana territories into two new territories and would allow each territory to decide whether it would be a slave territory or a free territory. The act passed and became a legal law. Northerners were furious that the act was passed, they believed that the Kansas-Nebraska Act shattered the peace and did not want the decision of whether it was a slave state or free state to be decided by popular sovereignty. Northerners were the opposite of the South in their beliefs and although the North also wanted change, they wanted it to change in a different direction. Although the North did not take as much action as the South, Northerners had many abolition groups and beliefs, and those groups had an immense number of people in them.…
After the Nullification Crisis, America proved victorious in the Mexican War of 1848, which meant the acquisition of even more land. Next, Henry Clay developed another key compromise, the Compromise of 1850 which provided yet another distinction between the American North and South. Under the compromise, Utah and New Mexico could now operate under popular sovereignty. In the North, no states could operate under popular sovereignty. With this, the North and South could be compared to two different, independent countries as both had significantly different government structures and cultures. Four years later, in 1854, the tensions reached a tipping point with the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act which stated that these two states could also operate under popular sovereignty. This led to “Bleeding Kansas” as violence ensued, and people travelled from all over America to voice opinions on a relatively small but gory war. Now, a civil war loomed large in America as both entities expressed widely divergent views and compromises had…
Tensions between the north and the south came to a head after Missouri’s 1819 request for admission to the Union as a slave state, which threatened to upset the balance between slave states and free states. To keep the peace, Congress organized a two-part compromise in 1820 called the Missouri Compromise. This compromise granted Missouri’s request but also admitted Maine as a free state. It also passed an amendment that drew an imaginary line across the former Louisiana Territory, establishing a boundary between free and slave states that remained the law of the land until it was negated by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. This policy promoted sectionalism as it continued the separation of states but for the time being, put the argument over slavery at ease.…
Between 1854 and 1861 a series of violent confrontations between the pro slavery south and anti-slavery North occurred in the Kansas territory and within the neighbouring towns in the state of Missouri. This was in part caused by the emigration of citizens from the neighbouring slave states including Missouri who came to secure the expansion of slavery into the state. Potter (1976) states that “What the public learned about Kansas came largely through the antislavery press and was, in a sense, the manufactured product of a remarkable propaganda…
Douglas, the Kansas-Nebraska Act declared that the issue of slavery would be decided through popular sovereignty in the states of Kansas and Nebraska, which resulted in the repealing of the Missouri Compromise. Northerners became enraged, igniting the civil war in Kansas. Peace was maintained in Nebraska due to the fear Missouri would become surrounded by free states on three sides, providing slaves many routes to escape if southerners lost the wars in both Kansas and Nebraska. However, Bleeding Kansas, the small civil that resulted from the vast population of both antislavery northerners and proslavery southerners in Kansas, further heightened the tension between the North and South regarding slavery, ultimately triggering the Civil War. Without "Bleeding Kansas" which derived from the Kansas-Nebraska Act, the Civil War would have been further postponed, but instead it brought long-term change into the lives of African Americans, which over time led to their…