Preview

How Did Lenin Get To Power

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
529 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Lenin Get To Power
There were lots of factors that led to left wing Lenin getting to power. Some of those factors were the Provisional Government, the Kornilov affair and the effects of World War One.
The Provisional Government led to the rise of lenin’s power due to bad economic decisions they created, the kornilov affair helped arm the Bolsheviks with weapons to raid the winter palace and overthrow the Provisional Government, and the effects of World War One caused lots of economic instability and made the everyday life hard for the peasants. Multiple trials and errors by the Provisional Government helped secure left wing Lenin's power. The Provisional Government was the interim government created after the fall of the russian autocracy. A major failure of the Provisional Government was that they allowed russia to remain in World War One when they knew the economic damages it was causing in the country. Due to the war there was inflation and food shortages which made the peasants really hungry and angry. Things got so bad that even soldiers were deserting the war due to lack of supplies and resources. Another failure of the provisional government was the refusal to give the peasant land. By doing this the provisional Government lost the support of many peasants.This is …show more content…
The Kornilov affair was when Kerensky appointed Kornilov as general and Kornilov felt that it was time to deal with the revolutionaries and create a strong government, so he ordered his troop to go to Petrograd and the people of Petrograd panicked and so did Kerensky because he thought Kornilov would remove him from power so he seeked help from the Bolshevik Red Army and gave them rifles. The upside was that the troops never made it to Petrograd but the Red Army kept the rifles. This helped Lenin get into power because it armed the Bolsheviks with weapons to be able to storm the winter palace where the Provisional Government was
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Why do some historians believe the Provisional Government was doomed from the beginning?
    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why do some historians believe the Provisional Government was doomed from the beginning?

    Historians may believe the Provisional Government was doomed because of a major problem with the provisional government which was the Dual Authority. The Provisional Government was made up of members of the old Duma that had refused to disband at the Tsars command. This meant that they were basically the same men that the Tsar had appointed before the revolution, so nothing had changed in that regard. Consequently, they had no goodwill from the public backing them up, so they would be judged purely on what the public could see happening. Furthermore, the Government had to share power with the Petrograd Soviet. This illegitimate relationship lessened the power of the Provisional Government existentially. Incidentally, it should be mentioned that the two factions were not necessarily hostile towards one another from the start, with some members being members of both groups at the same time. This combination of convenience however, could not last for long.Without a shred of a doubt, one of the biggest problems with the Provisional Government was the continuation of the war. The war was a lost cause by this stage and the Provisional Government would have wanted to pull out if it were a logical possibility, but in order to keep Russia afloat they needed to keep up the fight for the money that they were receiving from Britain and France. The loans that Russia had taken out from these countries while under the Tsarist regime had left Russia financially destroyed. The injections of money and supplies that the allies were providing Russia with because of their involvement in the war was the only thing keeping Russia stable. If Russia could have started to engage in peace talks, as suggested by Josef Stalin, then the Provisional Government could concentrate on sorting out the social and economic problems properly, but because of the desperate need for the war credits, this was not a viable solution. The effect of this choice to keep fighting is somewhat akin to watching a…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Lenin Gain Power
    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page

    How Did Lenin Gain Power

    In 1922, when Vladimir Lenin died, someone needed to step up and the Soviet Union. As he was slowly dying, a power struggle emerged between Leon Trotsky, and Joseph Stalin. Even though Trotsky “had been widely viewed as the heir of Lenin, it was relatively easy for Stalin to combine with the other Bolshevik leaders in order to head off this threat” (Paley 10). In Lenin’s “Final Testament”, Lenin could already see that Stalin was quickly and surreptitiously gaining power. Stalin’s position of General Secretary gave him the ability to appoint people to important positions. Lenin was also reluctant to see Stalin as his successor because he thought that Trotsky could do a much better job. Lenin believed that Trotsky was the best man in the central…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    How Did the Bolsheviks Survive the Early Days?
    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages

    How Did the Bolsheviks Survive the Early Days?

    A key factor that allowed Lenin and his party to dominate Russia was how the power was distributed throughout the government. The Bolsheviks created a system that took the form of a ‘pyramid of power’ this meant that the decisions and power sifted through all the political parties involved in the government finally leading up to the central committee; which was subjugated by the Bolsheviks. This meant that no matter what anyone else wanted if the Bolsheviks didn’t want to pass or agree with something, they didn’t have to; resulting in an extremely de facto government. The reason the Bolsheviks created this system how it was, is down to Lenin’s avid disbelief in democracy, Lenin favoured his ideal of democratic centralism, which invariable meant that he was in command and this ‘pyramid of power’ system suited Lenin’s desires. The fact that nobody else had such control of the government would have made it difficult for any change as they couldn’t get any alternative in the public domain as the Bolshevik system wouldn’t allow it, therefore any opposition that did exist wouldn’t be able to express their opinions and so the Bolsheviks were in a pretty secure position, thus able to survive the early days.…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain why there was no clear succession to Lenin in 1924.
    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Explain why there was no clear succession to Lenin in 1924.

    In the USSR at the time of Lenin’s death there was no voting system for power. Although the Communists were the party destined to lead the USSR and there was no dangerous rival for their authority, the…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Vladimir Lenin's Consolidation Of Power In 1917
    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Vladimir Lenin's Consolidation Of Power In 1917

    Russia was torn between the world war and the population was threatened as levels of starvation rose whilst industry fell. The provisional government could not do much to stop Russia plummeting as they did not have much power and the people of Russia failed to support them (1). The citizens of Russia were desperately looking for help and the Bolshevik party, created with the help of Lenin and Trotsky in the year 1917, had the answer. Slowly, they had managed to become one of the most powerful parties ever created, but many factors were to cause the consolidation of power. In this essay I will be comparing the significance of Vladimir Lenin in the Bolshevik consolidation of power with another important factor; Leon Trotsky.…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Far Was the Provisional Government Responsible for Their Own Downfall?
    • 1254 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Far Was the Provisional Government Responsible for Their Own Downfall?

    The Provisional Government was largely responsible for its downfall in 1917 for a number of reasons. Firstly, it could be argued that the Provisional Government was doomed to fall due to the nature of its existence. In the first Provisional Government led by Prince Lvov, it became apparent that it lacked legitimate authority because it was not an elected body. The Provisional Government was made up of former Duma members who had refused to disband at the Tsar’s demand. As such, they had no legitimate claim to the loyalty and obedience of the Russian people, which was a weakness that was contributory to its downfall in 1917.…

    • 1254 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How far was the Provisional Government responsible for its own downfall
    • 875 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How far was the Provisional Government responsible for its own downfall

    To a large extent I believe that the provisional government was responsible for its own downfall due to the fact that they had to share power with the soviets and their perilous decision to continue fighting in the First World War. Their decision to carry on fighting in the war was the most important due to lost support from the Russian people and more importantly, from the armed forces who they relied on to defend them. There are also other factors which contributed to the provisional government’s downfall such as the return of Lenin and the Kornilov affair which led to the success and rise of the Bolsheviks.…

    • 875 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Causes of Bolshevik Success Using Voilence
    • 1978 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Causes of Bolshevik Success Using Voilence

    The Bolsheviks consolidated their power after October 1917 however they faced many severe problems which made keeping their power complex. For Lenin and the Bolsheviks winning political power was relatively easy compared with retaining it. The Bolsheviks may have had a temporary majority in the All-Russia soviet in October 1917, but they did not have a majority following in the country as a whole . Russia was in chaos, politically and economically, and normal government had broken down in large areas. . yet lenin was able to overcome these problems and hold ontopower to create the world first communist state. The Bolsheviks overcame these problems by use of violence in the form of repression, and violence in war communism and the red army during the civil war however violence against their opponents was not their only strategy, Lenin also put forward policies of reform which showed that they were willing to compromise their principles to keep hold of power when faced with early problems and after the outbreak of the civil war the disunity of the opposition and the geographical and organisational factors were key factors which helped the Bolsheviks consolidate their grip on power.…

    • 1978 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    How Did Nikolai Romanov Fail?
    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages

    How Did Nikolai Romanov Fail?

    The first of these was headed by a moderate liberal, Georgi Lvov and the second was ran by Alexander Krensky. The Provisional Government knew that the Bolsheviks were going to strike. The reports of the Bolshevik's conspiracy in where always in Krensky's mind, but there was overwhelming dissent about the revolution. The government was so unstable that Krensky had little to no control over the congress or military, and because Krensky did not have "the majesty of government, the laws, the protection of friends and of the state," he had no power, no control over his fortune. Krensky's failure as a prince had to do with the unstable government and the political factions all brewing their revolutions and civil unrest. He did not prepare for fortune. He met his end by not being able to deal with…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To what extent was Lenin crucial to the Bolshevik seizure of power in October 1917?
    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages

    To what extent was Lenin crucial to the Bolshevik seizure of power in October 1917?

    On 24th October 1917 the Lenin and the Bolsheviks led a revolution in Russia. The Bolshevik Red Guards led a revolution against the Provisional Government by seizing control of stations, telephone exchanges, post offices, the national bank and the Winter Palace in Petrograd. Now Lenin set about creating the world’s first communist state. Although he was a strong influence, he was not solely responsible for the outbreak of revolution. There are other important causes of the Bolshevik seizure of power, such as the weakness of the Provisional government and Kerensky’s mistakes. Also other important factor was the actions of Trotsky and the timing and luck of the Bolsheviks. However, Lenin was, to a large extent, crucial to the Bolshevik seizure of power because he presented his April thesis, which gave the people of Russia an awakening to the communist aim.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Organizational Structure
    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Organizational Structure

    Altogether, there are about eight organizational structure types. Each company has to find a way of putting these “pieces of the puzzle” into one well thought-out outline to represent the necessary relationships. In this case, we’ll be looking at the divisional structure. According to the text, “as organizations grow and become increasingly diversified, they find that functional departments have difficulty managing a wide variety of products, customers, and geographic regions. In this case, organizations may restructure to group all functions into a single division and duplicate each of the functions across all the divisions (Bateman and Snell 8th edition, 2009).”…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Compare And Contrast Russian Revolution And American Revolution
    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Russian Revolution And American Revolution

    Russia had lost a lot of territory to Germany and Austria. Generals and the higher class were not reliable in the military and were completely incompetent. There were food riots all over Russia and the troops refused to listen to their superiors. The March Revolution was one of the three revolutions that Russia had during this time period. The Tsar Nicholas the second removed himself from the throne. The Duma, or Parliament of Russia were ignored and held no power up until this point. They took over the government and called themselves the Provisional Government. The Provisional government was set up to make a Democratic constitution and have free elections. Alexander Kerensky was elected president. He believe that the only way to end the war was to have a victorious peaceful ending. The peasants which make up more then half of the population wanted the war to end whether it was victorious or not. They were sick of loosing their sons and stated that they refused to grow crops and make goods as long as the war was still going on. Lenin was the leader of the Bolsheviks, which had about 100,000 members out of the 160 million people in Russia. He went head to head against Kerensky over power and leadership of Russia. In October Lenin got his group together and convinced them to take control of the government. He eventually took over and created the Bolshevik Dictatorship, using military force. The differences of…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Bolshevik Takeover
    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Bolshevik Takeover

    On the 15th of March 1917, Nicholas abdicated for himself and his son. His brother, Grand Duke Michael, refuses to take the throne and abdicated the next day. Russia then became a republic and the First Provisional Government took over. The Provisional Government promised many liberal reforms. They promised elections by the end of the year, secret ballots and to remove the secret police. Some of the other reforms were freedom of speech, freedom of press, freedom of assembly and freedom of religion.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Literary Elements Used by Poe Essay Example
    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Literary Elements Used by Poe Essay Example

    In the writings of great authors it is easy to pick out the literary elements used by them. Edgar Allan Poe is one of these authors. He makes use of the same literary elements in many of his stories. Three of the most used literary elements are irony, antagonists and foreshadowing.…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of Violence Against Women Is A Men's Issue By Jackson Katz
    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Summary Of Violence Against Women Is A Men's Issue By Jackson Katz

    While feminism and sexism have been fairly predominant talking points throughout society, in recent years there has been a strong push to continue to advocate for change and make sure that change is happening. As Jackson Katz articulates throughout his article, “Violence against Women is a Men’s Issue” a variety of factors contribute to how our society looks at and talks about violence. Katz goes on further to talk about how men might not have as much invested into this particular issue but they should. He states this, “It’s normal. And precisely because the mistreatment of women is such a pervasive characteristic of our patriarchal culture, most men, to a greater or lesser extent, have played a role in its perpetuation.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics