Preview

How Did Napoleon Bonaparte Use Spanish Resistance

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1709 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Napoleon Bonaparte Use Spanish Resistance
Napoleon and the Spanish Resistance Throughout time, the military has been considered one of the key features in a civilization. It has been considered the heart and soul of many countries and empires and has been the center of many cultures. Throughout history we have seen many military leaders and military powers. We have seen military techniques and technology change as we progress. Our schools are filled with legends of great war heroes and hard-fought battles. One such hero is Napoleon Bonaparte, perhaps one of the greatest generals who ever lived. In his adventures and conquest, as general of the French army, he warred against many lands. These included Spain, in which Napoleon met a strong resistance. The Spaniards were using a new …show more content…

Each battle would usually consist of a significant number of soldiers going straight towards each other until they forced the other to retreat. Guerilla warfare on the other hand doesn't rely on this premise. In order to successfully defeat your opponent using guerilla tactics, you must rely instead on a series of smaller confrontations (Free Dictionary). By using these "hit-and-run" strategies, guerilla fighters can quickly tire they're opponents and not lose as many men. Another difference, is that guerilla war relies heavily on ambush. Ambush is when the ambushing force uses concealment to attack an enemy that passes its position. (Free Dictionary) Most guerillas will camouflage themselves in thick forests or hide on hilltops. Some guerillas will even use crowds to conceal themselves, called urban guerillas. Urban guerillas have to rely heavily on support from the citizens. Guerilla warfare basically relies on one standard. The element of surprise. Often, guerillas will not be in uniform and carry just a concealed weapon. By doing this it helps the guerillas startle the enemy and catch them off guard, giving them the clear cut advantage. Also, the enemy is always in a state of fear, never knowing when or where these guerillas could pop out and attack. They are constantly on …show more content…

Napoleon's once unequaled army was now diminishing. After defeats in Spain and misfortune in Russia, countries began to realize that Napoleon's "invincible" reputation was tainted. For the first time people saw that this "unstoppable" general could, in fact, be stopped. Momentum and hope were gained by all of Napoleon's enemies. In 1813, Napoleon was in his German campaign. However, because of the Peninsular war, he was unable to send troops causing them to be 200,000 troops short. This created even more casualties and death for Napoleon, as he could just stand and watch his empire fall. Even more enemies were gathering against Napoleon, sensing his newfound weakness. Austria, Britain, Russia, Prussia and Sweden all joined forces to fight against Napoleon. Napoleon's forces were now by far outnumbered by this new alliance and he was barely holding on. Eventually, the allies would attack Paris and take the city. When Napoleon returned and heard of the defeat he knew it was the end. Finally realizing that his unstoppable armies had been stopped for good he abdicated on April 11th, 1814. The Peninsular War has helped diminish Napoleon's armies and expose his weaknesses. His enemies had finally caught on and in the end it was the great Napoleon who finally gave

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Battle tactics are said to have changed over time. However, just the opposite is evident. Battle tactics are for anyone to use, but work best with military’s that are stable and continually training. In many cases, militaries throughout the world can be seen using the same tactics today as used in the 2nd Punic War particularly The Battle of Cannae. What make tactics improve so well is the repetition of both practicing in training and executing tactics on the battlefield. Battle tactics improved with the establishment of a professional military because, most soldiers who were now veterans could move up in ranks and understand how they were previously defeated in different battles.…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I. In March 1814,b/f Napoleon had been defeated, his 4 major enemies—Great Britain, Austria, Prussia, and Russia—had agreed to remain united, not only to defeat France but also to ensue peace after the war.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    12. Britain, Russia, and Austria defeat Napoleon and take Paris in 1813. What is Napoleon’s fate in 1814?…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout time, the history of Napoleon is retold over and over again. His conquests of Europe are legendary. He is considered one of the greatest military leaders, his victories are widely known, yet people seem to forget his losses. Napoleon had many domestic and diplomatic/military achievements, some were great and others were his worst blunders.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Geoffrey Parker describes the military revolution as a period between 1500-1750 when changes in tactics, army size, and fortifications transformed the way wars were fought and how they were won1. Fortresses were very useful strongholds until cannons became more developed and knocked the fortresses down. Changes in the design of fortresses then made them more successful against bombardment. Firearms on the battlefield slowly became more present until it became the sole dominant choice of weapon in combat. The size of armies during this period drastically increased, partly because of the need to surround a castle during a siege. The army size of nearly every western power more than doubled during this time…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Napoleon's grand army was twice the size of any other army Napoleon had ever commanded (Connelly, 1999). According to Connelly (1999), it was Napoleon's hope that the size of his army would be so great that it would intimidate Alexander and as a result Alexander would make terms with him without a fight. However, this was not the case (Connelly, 1999). Of the roughly 600,000 troops that followed Napoleon into Russia, fewer than 100,000 made it out (Thompson, 1958). The Russians had managed to defeat Napoleon's grand army.…

    • 2136 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Spanish armada started in 1588 and finished around a month later. The Spanish lost dramatically for several reasons. This essay will tell you why the Spanish failed so badly and why England won.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Understanding the Battle of Waterloo is important to know, because it shows that bad decision making and bad intelligence reporting can lead to one's defeat. Since 1804, Napoleon was trying to create his own empire over Europe. He was defeated in 1805 by the British, but he continued to move forward across Europe before being forced to surrender. He returned to Paris in March 1815, prompting Britain, Prussia, Russia and Austria to declare war. Napoleon invaded Belgium in June, attempting to take over Brussels. He sent his men to engage Wellington, also sending a battalion against General Blucher's Prussian army. Blucher decided to retreat as Wellington's army wasn't holding the front line against Napoleon's army. A decisive battle is now set…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As an Administrator of our local nursing home it has come to my attention that we have been bought out by a national group. With this change being made there will unfortunately be displacement of some of our residents. This paper will describe both the advantages and disadvantages of using different types of media for communication. It will also describe the effects of HIPAA on these types of communication.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gentleman Warfare is the common method of fighting, and it is down by having each side line up across from each other and they take turns firing their guns at each other. We were able to see this in the movie the Patriot when they all lined up and we were able to see the front row of each sides line up fall to the ground because of the line of fire. Guerrilla Warfare was introduced by the America Militia, since they were not as good as the British they decided to hide and shoot. This style of warfare made a great impact on war because it changed the way both sides started to fight, once the America Militia started to use this style of fighting, British also started to use it. At first the style of warfare the Militia started was “illegal” because they were suppose to fight Gentleman…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Napoleon

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Napoleon rose to power during the aftermath of the French Revolution. He staged a coup d'état and installed himself as First Consul, later becoming the emperor. He is widely regarded as one of the greatest military commanders of all time because of his success in his wars. Napoleon sought to spread ideas of the French Revolution but contradicted them in many ways.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When speaking of the Spanish-American War and World War 1 there are many differences and similarities between the two historical wars. The Spanish War began in April of 1898 and ended in August of 1898. World War 1, however, began in July of 1914 and ended in November of 1918. Both of these wars were very important in history and they have helped make America the way that it is today. Some of the differences between the wars include; the reasons for the wars, weapons, casualty numbers, as well as, who the wars were against. On the other hand, there are many similarities such as battle strategies, sinking of ships, the use of propaganda, and the end results.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In June of 1812, Napoleon began his deadly Russian campaign, a landmark in the history of the caustic potential of warfare. All mainland Europe was under his control, and the invasion of Russia was an effort to force Tsar Alexander planned once again to the terms of a treaty that Napoleon had enforced upon him four years earlier. Having collected nearly half a million soldiers, from France as well as all of the states of Europe, Napoleon entered Russia at the lead of the largest army ever seen. The Russians, under the power of Marshal Kutuzov, could not hope to defeat him in a direct conflict.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Breakdown of Napoleon’s Russian Battle Dustin CM412 The Breakdown of Napoleon’s Russian Battle Napoleon Bonaparte was outwardly unconquerable. Beneath his control, the Grande Army had dominated a large portion of Europe, and was viewed by others as a strict rival. Despite the fact off all this, Napoleon completed a deadly error: he entered Russia. Of the 600,000 troops that reached the Russian boundary, only 100,000 made it out (Moore, Online).…

    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of the greatest advancements of warfare came during the age of Napoleon Bonoparte. Napoleon had imperialistic goals, and he believed that nothing would stop him from achieving those goals. He used every resource necessary to conquer the lands he desired. Napoleon did so by uniting France for his cause. He instilled tremendous nationalism throughout France, and before long, everyone was on board with his imperialistic plans. The French believed that they were the best of the best, and so when France would go to war, Napoleon had the full support of the people. This was an ingenious strategy, and it has become known as a “total war” effort. Some consider this a watershed in military history as the true beginning of modern warfare. One aspect of “total war” is that all able-bodied men are called to fight; the decision is not optional. This is known as “Levee en Masse.” Because Napoleon had the full support of his people this was never a major problem with enlisting soldiers. Another…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays