One of the most pernicious allegations made against the African-American people was that our slave ancestors were either exceptionally docile, content, or loyal, thus, explaining their purposed to failure to rebel extensively. One example is Nat Turner, he became a preacher who claimed he had been chosen by God to lead a slave from bondage. On August 21, 1831, he led a violent insurrection. he made a troop of slaves that held, at least for six weeks. His rebellion left approximately 55-65 but Nat Turner failed to end slavery and he was eventually caught and later hanged. Although he inspired to the rest of Africans Americans to have the same vision as Nat Turner to fight for their freedom, values, and natural rights of a human. Black slaves were demanded by the whites and looked for young blacks of both sexes from 12 to 25. Additionally, Nathaniel was sold 3 times in his …show more content…
childhood and fought against the oppression of slavery. Nat Turner, born into slavery on October 2, 1800, on a Southampton County plantation. The incident ended the emancipation movement in that region and led to even harsher laws against slaves. In 1821, Turner ran away from his overseer, returning after thirty days because of a vision in which the spirit had told him to "return to the service of my earthly master." The next year, following the death of his master, Samuel Turner, Nat was sold to Thomas Moore.
Three years later, Nat Turner had another vision. He saw lights in the sky and prayed to find out what they meant. Then, while he was laboring in the field, he discovered drops of blood on the corn, as though it were dew from heaven, and he communicated it to many, both white and black, inthe neighborhood; and then he found on the leaves in the woods hieroglyphic characters and numbers, with the forms of men in different attitudes, portrayed in blood, and representing the figures he had seen before in the
heavens.
After his rebellion resulted in a total failure, but he took a stand against oppression for the cause of abolition. In conclusion, Nat Turner was a docile or content and loyal, but it does not mean that is totally conform to his life being a slave, he was a loyal servant of God, as he gathers more visions from his God, he started to reuniting with his fellows to creating a plan to attack all the whites that were on their way. They killed men, women, and children. Thus, explain their purposed to failure to rebel extensively, but leaving a legacy to new generations of person of color but with different ways to interpret their acts, like King Jr. did he make a protest and a speech that they wanted equality and the same rights as a white man. In contrast, he said the militant groups that were created against the white person, but he said not all the white persons are evil and an abuser, that means that the white persons are like siblings. In the other hand, Nat Turner felt like he had a compromise with God. he felt like he was a superhero that will save the persons that were not treated with equality.
Works Cited
Primary Sources:
Albert, Octavia V. Rogers. The House of Bondage Or Charlotte Brooks and Other Slaves. Oxford University Press, 1991. Primary sources with commentary. ISBN 0-19-506784-3
Berlin, Ira, Joseph P. Reidy, and Leslie S. Rowlands, eds. Freedom: A Documentary History of Emancipation, 1861–1867 5 vol Cambridge University Press, 1982. Very large collection of primary sources regarding the end of slavery
Frederick Douglass: Autobiographies by Frederick Douglass, Henry Louis Gates, Jr. Editor. (Omnibus of all three) ISBN 0-940450-79-8
Secondary Source:
"A Rebellion to Remember: The Legacy of Nat Turner." Ed. Jennifer L. Larson. University of North California, 2004. Web. 9 Nov. 2016. The signal that God sent to attack was an eclipse.
Styron, William. The Confession of Nat Turner. 25th ed. N.p.: Vintage, 1992. Print. Turner gave a jailhouse confession
Gates, Henry Louis, Jr. "Did African Slaves Rebel?" The Root, n.d. Web. 9 Nov. 2016.
Cromwell, John W. The Aftermath of Nat Turner's Insurrection. Vol. 5. N.p.: n.p., 1920. Print. No.2.
Morris, Thomas D. Southern Slavery and the Law, 1619–1860 University of North Carolina Press, 1996.