Preview

How Did Oliver Wendell Holmes Influence The Judicial System

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
178 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Oliver Wendell Holmes Influence The Judicial System
Oliver Wendell Holmes was appointed to the U.S. Supreme court by President Roosevelt in 1901. He was in office for 30 years until 1932, when he retired at the age of 90. This long dedication to his job and the number of young lawyers who studied under him led Oliver to have an immense influence on the judicial system in America. Holmes’s philosophy was based not on morals but on whims of the majority. Moreover, he stated that law corresponds to that which is thought to be convenient at any given time. However, this policy meant that the convenience of those who were either the most vocal or held the most power and money would be put first. Due to this, the Constitution was interpreted according to the views of whoever sat on the Court.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Assess the Leadership of John Marshall as Chief Justice
    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Assess the Leadership of John Marshall as Chief Justice

    4.) Assess the leadership of John Marshall as Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Apush Chapter 12 Study Guide
    • 2265 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Apush Chapter 12 Study Guide

    John Marshall (September 24, 1755 – July 6, 1835) was an American jurist and statesman who shaped American constitutional law and made the Supreme Court a center of power. Marshall was Chief Justice of the United States, serving from January 31, 1801, until his death in 1835.…

    • 2265 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What Is The Marbury Vs Madison Case
    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What Is The Marbury Vs Madison Case

    In 1803, a single case managed to change how America's government would be run forever. In John Adams' last few days as president, he appointed a small group of Federalists into power. When Thomas Jefferson was elected into office, and he told James Madison to not bring the commissions to an appointed “midnight judge” named William Marbury. This gave the newly appointed Chief Justice, John Marshall, a great opportunity to spread his Federalist influence deeper into the American government. When Marbury found out that his commission was being held back by Madison, he sued for its delivery.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    To what extent has the Roberts Court witnessed a revival of conservative activism
    • 968 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To what extent has the Roberts Court witnessed a revival of conservative activism

    Firstly, a major principal characteristic of the Roberts Court is over turning congressional and state legislation in order to achieve conservative goals. The Roberts court is finding laws unconstitutional and reversing precedent, two measures of activism. But the ideological direction of the court’s activism has undergone a marked change toward conservative results. The Roberts Court issued conservative decisions 58% of the time in its first 5 years throughout all cases. The Burger and Rehnquist courts issued conservative decisions 55% and the lowest from the Warren courts, which issued conservative decisions only 34% of the time. The incline in conservative decisions gives evidence that there is a growing number of people who favour this strict and traditional form of court rulings and decision making as opposed to Roberts immediate predecessors who display a more modern and loose approach to the US political system…

    • 968 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tyranny In The British Constitution
    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Tyranny In The British Constitution

    Their was way too much power in the constitution. It had to be divided. The first one it was divided into was federalism, which…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Warren Court's Role In The Legal System
    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page

    Warren Court's Role In The Legal System

    During the years 1952 to 1969 Earl Warren was selected as President of the Supreme court. The Warren Court issued multiple rulings that were challenged in the context of criminal investigations. Warren along with seventeen members in court played an important role in some decisions that were approved. These decisions affected the change of a more conservative court. The Warren Court showed a more liberal outlook. Among these judges were some who were firm and responsible in the decisions for their opinions. To conclude, to this day the Supreme Court has a very important role in the American legal system and this is due to the term that their decisions become law, affecting the following cases throughout the…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Compare And Contrast Texas And Us Constitution
    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Texas And Us Constitution

    The United states constitution is meant to serve as guide lane for all states for all states where the document is meant only to provide a basic structure to the government, and all decisions on meaning are to be interpreted by the Judiciary branch. As said by "J. Harvie Wilkinson III" "Americans…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Short Summary: The Virginia Plan
    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Short Summary: The Virginia Plan

    “In England, at this day, if elections were open to all classes of people, the property of landed proprietors would be insecure.” James Madison expressed in Notes of the Secret Debates of the Federal Convention of 1787. He believed that if elections were available to all classes of people, it would be the downfall of business and governing. But because the government was going to be responsible and in control of the states, it is important to take everybody’s word equally as they are ones being governed.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did James Madison Contribute To The Tyranny Of The Constitution
    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How Did James Madison Contribute To The Tyranny Of The Constitution

    For James Madison it was vital that all members of society had a say in choosing representatives this idea led to his disagreement surrounding the fiscal plan of Alexander Hamilton. Hamilton proposed several ideas to pay off the huge national debt that had accumulated over the past years, but his plan would involve a class of people who would become extremely wealthy and would help the government to finance large undertakings. Madison expressed concern that this plan would cause a dramatic increase not only in factions, but also in the overwhelming power of the wealthy faction to control the governments decisions. Madison supported “the formation of an enlightened public voice that would control and direct the measures of government.” Madison argued that a better plan for the country would be to allow the public to have the largest role in forming the…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Solicitor General Thurgood Marshall
    • 221 Words
    • 1 Page

    Solicitor General Thurgood Marshall

    Thurgood Marshall is one of the most well known people in the history of civil rights in United states and the first African American male Supreme Court Justices. He served for 24 years then retired in 1991 due to advancing years and bad health. He died later in 1993 at the age of 85. He also served as the legal director for the NAACP in the years of 1940 through 1961, a pivotal time for the organization, as changing the policy of racial segregation was one of its goals.…

    • 221 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Earl Warren: Chief Justice
    • 134 Words
    • 1 Page

    Earl Warren: Chief Justice

    Earl Warren served as Chief Justice on the U.S Supreme Court from 1953-1969, before which he had served as Attorney General of California in 1938 and soon after served as the Governor of California. It was clear that Warren had become more liberal with age and as Chief Justice he believed “the Court [was]as a protector of the public, the means to restore ethics and mind the conducts of legislators.” (Oyez) The Warren court and its decisions brought about a significant amount of social change, rooted in establishing racial equality and protecting civil liberties. For this, the Warren Court is mistakenly labeled as liberal. The court’s decisions, especially those of Chief Justice Warren, reflected a kind of progressive thinking. Warren navigated…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Marshall Trilogy
    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Marshall Trilogy

    John Marshall was fourth Chief Justice in Supreme Court and accredited as being the most influential man in the development of the United States legal system and federal Indian law. The Marshall Court made three significant decisions that directly balanced the power of the Federal Laws and Indian Federal Law. Amongst these resolutions are the three cases that form the simple outline of federal Indian law in the United States, this has been referred to as the ‘Marshall Trilogy.’…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gideon V. Wainwright
    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gideon V. Wainwright

    Since the Supreme Court was established in 1789, it has ruled on some of the biggest issues in the United States. Most of the rulings by the Supreme Court effect Americans everyday. Earl Warren was the 14th chief justice of the Supreme Court and saw some of the most important cases in the history of the United States and many are still in effect today. The Warren court heavily believed in improving the civil liberties of the people. His ruling on Gideon v. Wainwright is no different.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Justice Potter Stewart
    • 1840 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Justice Potter Stewart

    The President appointed Justice Stewart on the bases that his “high profile in the Ohio bar made him an attractive candidate for the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, where he served for the next four years. He was widely respected for his confidence and efficiency as an appellate judge, and Eisenhower returned to him in 1958 when a seat opened on the Supreme Court” (“Potter Stewart -Further Readings”). The Senate vote on the appointment of Justice Stewart was a 70- 17 vote The ideology was seen embracing was judicial restraint . He stated when asked about his judicial philosophy, “ I'd like to be thought of as a lawyer” . By this he meant that he saw the proper function of a judge as interpreting the law as it applies to a particular case and not attempting to assert judicial influence over matters he saw the best left to the legislature . In turn this led to him being the swing vote on many cases” (Oyez). However, Stewart was very unpredictable in his ruling depending on the case since played the role of a lawyer. Justice Stewart appeared to change his judicial philosophy while sitting on the US Supreme Court by exercising judicial activism when civil liberty cases were brought to the court. “During his tenure, landmark decisions were handed down on press freedom, and without assuming an absolutist stance, Stewart indicated and judicial opinions and extrajudicial commentary that he believed that the press deserves a special place among American institutions” As a “journalist and chairman of the Yale Daily News”, he “advocated a preferred position for the organized press, which he understood the framers of the Constitution to have intended in order to assure the press’ autonomy” (Oyez); (Comegys 159). Stewart supported cases in favor of civil liberties, and despite his pragmatism, or…

    • 1840 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Bill of Rights and Supreme Court
    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Bill of Rights and Supreme Court

    Mckeever, Robert J. The United States Supreme Court: A political and Legal Analysis. New York and Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1997.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics