Preview

How Did Plato Shaped Aristotle's Philosophy?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1022 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Plato Shaped Aristotle's Philosophy?
Some of the ways in which Plato shaped Aristotle’s philosophy is that Plato believed the cosmos to be made up of four elements that are earth, air, fire, and water. Aristotle agreed that the cosmos was made up of these four elements. Although, some of the ways in which Aristotle deviated from Plato was that Plato deduced that the four elements are made of atoms, which are made from triangles, Aristotle disagreed with this. Even though Aristotle agreed on the four elements he disagree on the theory of atoms and void space, he believed that the earth was “full” (Lindberg 54). Also, concerning the “sensible objects” and its relation to the “theory of forms” (Lindberg 46) Plato “diminished the reality of the material world observed by the senses,” (Lindberg 46). While, Aristotle disagrees with this he believes that “they must exist fully and independently” and …show more content…
Plato “diminished the reality of the material world observed by the senses.” For Plato reality can be obtained in the “eternal forms,” and are reliant on “nothing else for their existence.” Objects in the practical world get their characteristics and “their very being from the forms,” that “sensible objects” only live “dependently” (Barnes 46). He states that forms are the reality, the ideas that live in the outer material world and the senses are an illusion, which is the mathematical approach. While Aristotle disagrees with this, he believes that “they must exist fully and independently” and they are “what make up the real world” (Barnes 46) pertaining to “sensible objects.” For Aristotle, the characteristics that make up an independent object’s nature do not have previous reality based on the forms, but “belong to the object itself” (Barnes 46). This allows individual objects to be the reality itself that have properties that consist of “form and matter” (Lindberg 47), which relates to Aristotle’s natural

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Aristotle’s Forms were found within this world. An object, x, could be defined as a being of a type X, because objects of the type X are the only thing in the universe which have four particular causes.…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato was a dualist and so believed that human beings consisted of two parts- body and soul. This view is portrayed throughout Plato’s famous theory of the Forms of which he suggests that true substances are not physical bodies, but are the eternal Forms that our bodies are merely the imperfect copy. In his Theory he tells of a World of Forms representing knowledge, which he also names the ‘real’ world and the world of Particulars signifying opinions, the world in which we live in. The Forms come from a world of perfection which are illuminated by the Form of the Good which is at the top of the hierarchy and is the source of which the other Forms stemmed from.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Plato’s theory of forms proposes that all sensory objects are imitations of Forms, which, like the simplest mathematical equations, are imperishable and forever true.” (Fiero I: 98)…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato developed the theory that behind every concept or object in the visible world there is an unseen reality which he calls its ‘Form’. These Forms exist in the world of the Forms separate from our world of sensory perception. Within the world of the Forms the pattern or the objects and concepts for the material world exist in a state of unchanging perfection. Plato suggested the idea of forms in his book “De Republica”, which is a dialogue between Socrates and Glaucon, and the idea of dualism. Plato suggested that there are two worlds (dualism) we live in one of sensory perception and the true forms live in one of rational knowledge.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hup 102 Short Paper #2

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper I will be discussing the view on the forms, of both Plato and Aristotle. For starts, Plato’s views on the Forms are basically describing the true meaning about material objects in the world. Like for example viewing a desk in a class room, should be looked at as more than just what we see, but thousands of atoms put together to make it look like a desk or something like that. His idea of an object was defined by what we might think something is it’s basically a form of something else. He said that we could be sitting on a chair but its quality is of an object which form is that of a chair. This idea of the form by Plato exists in a heavenly realm that could be understood by the mind. Plato’s views on the forms were aspects of everyday life, anything from a table to a bench As well as ideas and emotions. The essence of Plato's theory of Ideas Forms lay in the conscious recognition of the fact that there is a class of entities, in which the best name is probably universal, that are entirely different from sensible things, which is interesting. Plato's theory of Forms assumed that Forms are universal and exist as substances. On the other hand, Aristotle firmly disagrees with the idea of Forms being universal.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    These are the things in the world that Plato finds more real than images. However, there non-permanence and dependency on things like the sun and other forms.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle vs Plato

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Aristotle’s and Plato’s views on forms were very different. Plato saw “forms” as descriptions and something like adjectives and it could be applied to more than one thing. If something was “delicious,” there was something else that was also “delicious” but they were not the same thing. These descriptions are real but are not physical matter. Aristotle, however, saw reality as having four causes: matter (what it is made up of), essence (what it is), producer…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Vyvanse Global Marketing Plan

    • 14341 Words
    • 58 Pages

    Vyvanse, incorporated with Shire Corporation, is a central nervous system stimulant made for children and adults with attention deficit hyperactive disorder (ADHD). The drug is meant to improve focus, organization, and to ease impulsivity in both children and adults.…

    • 14341 Words
    • 58 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle vs Platonist

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As mentioned before, Aristotle has different theories than Plato. He suggests that the forms can be discovered through a examination of the world being natural. Now, Plato believes that forms are farther than what humans can understand, it is way beyond.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is an ongoing debate as to whether Plato’s Theory of Forms truly teaches us anything about the physical or empirical world, with many scientists and philosophers throughout history having very contrasting views. Throughout this essay I will lay down both arguments for and against the above statement and evaluate the outcome.…

    • 745 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s thoughts tended to believe in two levels of reality. Plato held that metaphysics is dualistic: he proposed that there are two different kinds of things - physical and mental. There is what appears real and what is real. Plato believed that everything real takes on a form but doesn't embody that form. on the other hand, Aristotle’s beliefs lead to him seeing only one level of reality. He felt there was only one imminent world and that forms existed within particular things. Aristotle held that form had no separate existence and existed in matter. in nature, we never find matter without form or form without matter. substance is always a composition of form and matter.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Plato and other prominent philosophers such as Plutarch and Heraclitus were observing the world, they came to the conclusion that it was in a state of flux; they came to the conclusion that it was constantly changing. Plato wrote a number of texts including Phaedo and Republic; this worked with his dualistic approach concluding that our realm of appearances – or our world; and all within is changeable and will eventually cease to exist. He says that this world is nothing but a mere copy of forms, and the forms are described as the eternal and perfect idea of what a thing is. The world of the forms, to Plato is the only realm where true knowledge lies, Plato defined this as the realm of reality; this could in fact be trusted unlike our own world. There are a few reasons to Plato as to why The Forms exist, and these reasons are present through his work for example through The Theory of Recollection, and The Imperfection Argument. But several philosophers have critiqued Plato’s notion and they argued Plato’s arguments are actually just reasons for why forms should exist; rather than actual proof of the existence. Furthermore, The Third Man Argument in Plato’s ‘Parmenides’ brings a prominent problem for the theory of The Forms. For example, Russell called it ‘One…

    • 2371 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lust by Susan Minot

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Lust is having a self-indulgent sexual desire. Susan Minot portrayed the mind of a promiscuous high school female perfectly. Lust is powerful and seductive, but it's inherently selfish and opposed to love. For many girls who are having sex with different boys they can identify with the desire to be needed. The characters in "Lust" are written in a way to highlight the dysfunction and disconnection of everyone involved. The narrator herself is nameless and faceless, making the reader believe that she has already somehow disappeared, just as the men in her life have made her disappear after having sex. Similarly, the men are listed in a brief and are identified only by their sexual acts or by other, easily objectified characteristics. What makes the story sad is the girl knows she is basically nothing. Many people who have casual sex start to feel this way, there is usually something missing in their lives. While reading the story I kept asking myself "where are her parents" after realizing that she is in boarding school things suddenly became clear.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle

    • 901 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Firstly, one weakness of Aristotle’s theory is the lack of support surrounding his idea of the prime mover. Aristotle believed that behind every movement there must be a chain of events that brought about the movement that we see taking place. He believed that this chain of events must lead back to something which moves but is itself unmoved. This is referred to as the Prime Mover. However, there is no evidence to show that the prime mover exists as a reality, similar to theology, for example God in Christianity, as it is impossible to prove this which undoubtedly makes his theory lack support. As well as this, Aristotle’s theory only works if there is pre-existing matter. The prime mover can’t create matter, just in an architectural way. Aristotle said that ‘Nothing can come from nothing’ so this then goes against the Christian and Jewish belief of God as the creator. This means that it is hard for both Atheists and religious believers to contemplate this as a believable theory as it goes against their differing views…

    • 901 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    economics

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages

    If you have been given an Answer Booklet, follow the instructions on the front cover of the Booklet.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays