Plato “diminished the reality of the material world observed by the senses.” For Plato reality can be obtained in the “eternal forms,” and are reliant on “nothing else for their existence.” Objects in the practical world get their characteristics and “their very being from the forms,” that “sensible objects” only live “dependently” (Barnes 46). He states that forms are the reality, the ideas that live in the outer material world and the senses are an illusion, which is the mathematical approach. While Aristotle disagrees with this, he believes that “they must exist fully and independently” and they are “what make up the real world” (Barnes 46) pertaining to “sensible objects.” For Aristotle, the characteristics that make up an independent object’s nature do not have previous reality based on the forms, but “belong to the object itself” (Barnes 46). This allows individual objects to be the reality itself that have properties that consist of “form and matter” (Lindberg 47), which relates to Aristotle’s natural
Plato “diminished the reality of the material world observed by the senses.” For Plato reality can be obtained in the “eternal forms,” and are reliant on “nothing else for their existence.” Objects in the practical world get their characteristics and “their very being from the forms,” that “sensible objects” only live “dependently” (Barnes 46). He states that forms are the reality, the ideas that live in the outer material world and the senses are an illusion, which is the mathematical approach. While Aristotle disagrees with this, he believes that “they must exist fully and independently” and they are “what make up the real world” (Barnes 46) pertaining to “sensible objects.” For Aristotle, the characteristics that make up an independent object’s nature do not have previous reality based on the forms, but “belong to the object itself” (Barnes 46). This allows individual objects to be the reality itself that have properties that consist of “form and matter” (Lindberg 47), which relates to Aristotle’s natural