Preview

How Did Rome Meet The Common Good

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1741 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Rome Meet The Common Good
The massive Empire of Rome had something called that Roman Republic and The Common Good. Rome was affected by the others cultures for say Greece. People of Rome also had taken over many other cities like theirs. The number one question of the early 400 B.C was if they actually meet the common good? To be honest yes, I think that the city of Rome somewhat met the common good. In order to meet the common good the people of Rome and the Roman government had to promote the rule of law, prepare for a common defense, they had to support their economic system,provide public services and protect their own rights.

Whenever it comes down to the Roman empire, Supporting the Economic System worked really well in the city of Rome. Also whenever it comes
…show more content…
Just like In Protecting rights and providing public services Rome's promoting rule of law was not the best, but it was decent. I would give it a B because it is similar to how they protect their rights The poor usually got the worst punishments, brutal punishments. Rich and wealthy citizens are usually treated less harsh. It is just not fair to these poor people, what are they going to do magically appear money out of their hand. In order to promote there rule of law the romans had to write some kind of laws and they did. They had a specific name for the laws they were called the “Twelve Tables. Now with the Twelve Tables, the romans developed a legal system with courts, judges, and lawyers. Usually back then the judges would make their decisions off of common sense, fairness and individual rights.As the romans give more citizenship to conquered people, they also spread their legal system throughout the whole mediterranean sea.The Roman law is actually the legal system of ancient Rome, and the legal creation which occurred before the 7th century AD. In the early years in Rome, there were no written laws. The Roman Law actually lasted longer than the empire itself. Also, in the early days of the Roman Republic, there weren't any written laws either. The twelve tables set down relating to family relations, property, inheritance, and other important issues. Everyone …show more content…
If I were to give a grade on how Rome protected their rights I would give it a big C+. I would give it a C+ because when it came down to each and individual citizens rights, you really could only have rights if you were a citizen.The slaves did not have any rights at all. The roman government. Now the reason I gave that a C+ is because even if you weren't a citizen you should still be able to have some sort of rights. The roman government could do anything they wanted to you, beat you up, shoot you, anything!! With the upper class typically the patricians they had way more rights than anybody in Rome. I do not think that that this was really fair, today there is no rights that higher classes have that lower classes don’t have, that is the way it should be. Slavery was big , it was a huge society in Ancient Rome. It was also a normal part of Roman society.Slaves had very little rights, so owners could treat them badly with very little fear of any legal punishments. The soldiers called Gladiators were trained to be warriors who fought in shows or contest to put on a show for the Roman citizens. They were usually recruited from slaves.The fighting was really dangerous and most of the time resulted in death.In Rome there were two levels of wealthy ness one higher than the other. The patricians were the upper and ruling class of the old Roman Empire. Only specific

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ccot Whap

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Not everything was so perfect for the romans. Their large rate of success caused them to grow so large that even their government could not even manage it. the taxes were very high and were not on an even scale because the poor could not afford to pay the same…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The upper classes were a distinct level of the social hierarchy. Rome and China both had a clearly defined high level social class. In Rome were the patricians. The patricians overthrew the monarchy and established the republic. The wealthy class dominated the government. Similar to the patricians were the landlord class. The landlord class of China held a vast amount of land bought from poor serfs and peasants. This landlord class had the ability to avoid taxes and mount own military if they wished to attack the emperor of China. In these ancient societies, wealth meant power because the upper classes could control the poor by monopolizing the ownership of land and sale of…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the primary reasons that Rome fell was they had poor government. First of all, Rome may have good rules, but they did not enforce them. For example, too many people were exempt from conscription. (Document B) This was a problem because they didn’t have enough people in the army because everybody turned down going to the army. Also, Rome failed to enforce their laws. According to Priscus, wealthy lawbreakers in Rome were able to get away with crimes. (Document E) This was…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    AP world history

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rome: “republic” based on citizenship of free men; citizenship ensured loyalty to the state and brought taxes into the state treasury; emperor-dictators had to support the idea of the republic and pretend to follow what the Senate, council of elder wealthy men, decreed. Development of bureaucracy helped run empire.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The law was expected to be followed or harsh punishments were enforced. If I were to rate Rome's government on its promotion of rule of law I would give it a C+ for various reasons. You can't say Rome did not inform their people well enough of the law. The twelve tables were posted on public buildings and in the center of town. The twelve tables were all of the laws Rome's government expected its people to follow.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Study Guide Final

    • 1127 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Complicated, unorganized. Organized and explained Roman Law in one text. Created a model for law codes used in many countries today. Defined and explained terms. Broke down laws into either natural, civil, national.…

    • 1127 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Omar Medina

    • 279 Words
    • 1 Page

    In an economic aspect everyone in Rome was happier. Everyone could own land and people were making money. Slaves and freed slaves however couldn’t own land or other things. People in Rome were often rich and had a lot of money. That also improved quality of life of the Roman people.…

    • 279 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Did Rome Paid A C?

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There were many protests against the government, and threats for the Plebians to leave. That would make it so that they have no one to rule. However, they did have the twelve tables which are laws written down on tablets. That made it so everybody had to follow the laws. Both Patrician and Plebeian had rules to follow.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Rome Fell Essay

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To begin, when Rome was going through the tough times the had twenty-two emperiors in just fifty years. With this ineffecrive and inconsistant leadership Rome had stopped growing and evolving into what is could have become. The people had, instead of working with the leader to figure things out, ddecide that assaination was the way to go, aside from that the people also had a rough time choosing their leader. This shows how disrespectful and inconsiderate some of the people in Rome really were, which is my second point. Lastly, the population which at on point seemed as though it would never stop grow, in fact did. Because of this there was less tax money coing in then what was needed and it led to an increase in prices for everything else. Due to all of these problems with the government Rome was being distroyed from the inside out, but is that the only reason…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government that Rome had was an Empire, that means the emperor decides what to do to the people, the law, or anything that makes him pleased but won't cause a crisis. When Rome became an empire, it meant that Rome had dynasties or states under a single ruler, usually an emperor or empress. After the fall of the Roman Republic, their emerged Rome's absolute ruler named Augustus, or Octavian. At that time, the Romans wanted to recover their great republic, and Octavian had told them he would restore the power of the Senates and the Roman people, but at that time, Octavian already was the emperor in complete control. Roman emperors had a role in Rome's daily life as well.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For one, as reported by Priscus, a Roman ambassador(449 CE), who was interviewing a former citizen of Rome: “the condition of Roman subjects during a time of peace [was] worse than war.”(Doc. E) The Roman people were in bad shape because of an unfair law, “taxes [were] very severe, and unprincipled men inflict[ed] injuries on others.”(Doc. E) The dire situation convinced the Roman citizens more and more that they should protest. And when the people did fight back, internal problems surfaced in Rome. However, not only were there harsh taxes causing turmoil, the Roman government was corrupt as well. “The climax of misery is to have to pay in order to obtain justice.”(Doc. E) The rich were bribing the lawmakers so they could get out of facing the law, and the poor didn’t have enough money to get out of punishment as well! Therefore, a great hatred between the rich and the poor was established. Rome may have been able to withstand battles on the outside, but if faced harsh battles within. The patricians believed that they could get away with whatever they wanted to, all they had to do was pay. Murder, theft, abuse and bribery were now tolerated in a place that would not have allowed them to be before. To sum up, Rome’s destruction was induced by legal injustice inside the…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main reasons that allowed Rome was able to flourish was the generous giving of citizenship. That citizenship along with the factor of wealth decided a person social status. Slaves were not considered to have much worth socially. There was disparity of power between the rich and the poor. The rich were always wary of the gatherings of the poor, uneducated for fear of revolt.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nine eleven paper

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The military in Rome was horrific. Roman citizens were no longer proud to be in the military. The roman government had to pay mercenaries to go fight for them but sadly they would just take the money and never show up to battle. Soldiers who were already fighting would complain about the heavy armor, which led to the government not requiring them to ware helmets and breastplates. This was a lack in discipline for the army because now with the government lifting these rules many men died in battle (Document B). Romans were also invaded by many groups of people and they had no army to help them. This caused many Roman citizens to lose their land. The militaristic power in Rome lacked and now so did Rome.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman society allowed people to live their own lives to their preference without the worry of breaking the law or being thrown out of society. At the same time, they also consisted of an organized Roman Senate that was already inherited making their decisions consistent, but at the same time the citizens were allowed to express opinions through a voting system. Social standings allowed citizens to build up from poverty and become wealthy, rather than not having the freedom of being as powerful as you can. Overall, the Roman system is better than the Athenian system when it comes to citizenship, republican system, and social standings because Roman citizens were provided with more freedom and had fewer…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The play Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare,is about a young girl named Juliet and her lover, Romeo. Juliet, like Romeo, makes the change from an innocent teenager to a responsible adult during the play. In the beginning of the play, Juliet is obedient to her parents. After she meets Romeo, she would do anything in her ability to be with him, even take her life. Throughout the play Juliet changes in many ways, however, the readers have a strong feeling that she was forced to mature too quickly.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays