Preview

How Did Russia Move To Capitalism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
551 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Russia Move To Capitalism
Russia’s Movement Towards Capitalism

Since the end of the Soviet Union, Russia has faced many privations. One of these hardships was to surmount the collapse of the Soviet’s way of operating by the public sector. After the collapse, Russia tried to quickly move towards the private sector/market economy, they ended the governmental control over economic activity. The shift between having a communist system to having a capitalist system was a struggle; there were many challenges faced in trying to switch to a market economy.

Russia took two major actions in 1992 in order for its economy to become a market economy. Russia removed the price controls that was set by the Soviet government on goods sold within the country, and they began to sell government owned businesses to private individuals and companies; this was called privatization. However, many people could not afford these businesses, so the government offered loans that could be used to purchase businesses. The people who got these loans had to pay off their debt with their future profits. This plan did not end very well because many of the businesses were not lucrative, and were not able to pay off their debts. This was one of the factors that led to an economic crash in Russia in 1998. Even though it seemed like a failure, later on, over sixty percent of Russia’s workforce worked in the private sector.
…show more content…
However, the high cost of economic change moving from the public to private sector, was not beneficial to some of Russia’s population. Almost forty percent of the population lived below the poverty light at the end of the twentieth century. This raised questions about whether Russia’s economy was better when it was under the Soviet Union’s

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1. Russia overturned its conservative policies in many ways. Alexander II removed the serfdom. Cultural nationalism led to political demands and worried the state. Their lust to become as successful as the west led them to industrialize. The lower classes suffered greatly in this time period, and they demanded better living conditions. Since the serfdom was disestablished, the government gave them land, but they would only be able to leave if they paid off the debt on the land. Many things changed once communism took hold.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1750 and 1914, England, Germany, and Western Europe were all expanding. England was gaining land and trust in the Middle East, Germany was becoming an established nation, and Western Europe was thriving due to the Industrial Revolution. After recognizing all of this, Russia decided it was time for reform or be left in the dust. This caused major changes in Russia’s labor system such as emancipation of the serfs and industrialization to keep up with the changing world. Although they were going through these changes, there were continuities such as the treatment of the serfs and the type of reform they were doing.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the years 1906 – 1914, Peter Stolypin was pushing to de – revolutionise the peasantry and put into place economic reform, and there is evidence of this working. During these years large amounts of agricultural reform were set in motion. In 1906 45.9 million tonnes of agricultural production was produced, by 1913 this had grown significantly to 61.7 million tonnes. The massive change in the amount of product shows that agricultural and therefore economic reform had taken place. Farmers, at this time, had also started paying higher taxes, which is sign of higher income, again strengthening this idea of economic reform occurring. Stolypin, however successful he was in his endeavours, was pushing fiercely for a more independent and de-revolutionised peasantry. During November 1906, huge action was taken to change the way the peasants lived. They were freed from the constraints of commune control and land banks were set up to give money to those peasants who chose to leave. Many were also encouraged to move to Siberia, all of these reforms were starting to lay a foundation for a more independent peasantry. Economic reform was being pursued desperately by members of the government such as Stolypin, this can been seen by the copious amount of law, for example peasants leaving commune control, being put into place. The fact these laws were coming about shows that Russia was undergoing economic reform to some extent during this period, whether it was successful or not.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Do you ever wonder how communism could last for 70 years in Russia? Surely there was plenty of evidence, for decades, that the system was failing: food shortages, declining life expectancy, increased infant mortality, low standards of living, primitive hospitals, and sanitation facilities lagging far behind those in Western Europe and America—not to mention pollution far worse than in the West. But to diehard communists, the facts did not matter. All the observable negatives of…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Russian economy is universally declared to have been a thoroughly backward prior to 1890s therefore it is highly likely that there was economic improvement in the given period; however the extent of this is difficult to define due to the varying manifestations of economic improvement and the independence with which they may occur. The finance minister during this period was Sergei Witte, and to him the majority of the improvements are credited, yet the improvement was not universal. Whether this was him personally or simply a product the awful conditions which the Russian economy rose from is to be decided.…

    • 2009 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Russia was making attempts to strengthen its status on a world wide level, however, it was struggling to make transition from communism to democracy and to catch up with its European neighbors. It is hard to say whether the Great Reforms were successful and had a positive impact on Russia in general or not. In order to understand all benefits and drawbacks it is important to analyze the crucial events that…

    • 2018 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite the poor working conditions and the inequality that industrialization under capitalism creates (“The Industrial Revolution and Economic Growth”, 529) it is still a necessary step for Russia because it lays the groundwork for a successful socialist and eventually communist system of government that will allow all members of Russia to flourish. “[The Communist] openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions;”(Carl Marks and Friedrich Engel, The Communist Manifesto) Therefore it is important to note that capitalism is an impractical form of government that should not be implemented for any long term scenario it is merely a stepping stone that is unfortunate but essential to the development of a successful government. Then why must Russia endure capitalism? Why not skip straight to communism? It is for this reason, A does not equal C meaning that each step in the process is essential to getting the end result.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1800 and 1939 Russia underwent through a severe regime change. The people of Russia were in a state of great economic disparity, and the lower class faced hunger, poverty, etc. The lower class had very little of the grain, land, and fiscal control that was available in Russia, such pretext of large income disparity gaps and unbalanced control of GDP were the pre-requisites se in place for the takeover of socialism. And such is what happened. Within this time period Russia went through a proletariat revolution of communism aiming have the workers of the world unite and free themselves from capitalist oppression to create a world run by and for the working class. However even though they underwent this major social-economic change, conditions in Russia stayed around the same. We still saw that Russia was under leadership of a Totalitarian authority. And maintained the same economic conditions where the consumer-based market never developed and the population was largely rural and the economy was agricultural based.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There has never been a genuine entrepreneur class in Russia since this. The accentuation of the Russian economy lies for the most part along the lines of cooperation versus conservatism in the United States. The priority of the progressive system of society sitting on top of distinction has modified Russian nationals to esteem prosperity of society to that of their individual selves. The tsar administration of Russia reprimanded…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The torpor of the Russian economy compared to other European Great Powers was a prominent predicament to both Alexander III and Nicholas II. In order to sustain Russia’s Great Power status, both Tsars engaged in a policy of economic renewal between the years 1881 and 1095. Despite success in managing to proliferate economic growth rates, the attempts of economic reform between 1881 and 1905 weren’t sufficient in order to make Russia’s economy strong enough to fully maintain Russia’s ‘Great Power’ status as Russia still lagged behind the other Great Powers come 1905. (92)…

    • 756 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To what extent did Russia undergo economic and political reform in the years 1906-14? – Sam Puckey…

    • 1067 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kelley, Colleen, Kori Werner, and Tabitha Lurz. "Russia 's Population Fallout: The Aftermath of Communism." People.usd.edu. Web. 23 Dec. 2010.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    At the beginning of the 20th century, Russia was a very poor country. Most of the people were peasants, and there was very little industry. After the First World War, things only got worse; the army suffered many huge defeats. The poorest of the people were starving, due to a shortage of food. During the war, in 1917 the Communists came about by two important revolutions; they were led by Lenin. Communism is a system of government in which the state controls the economy and one party holds power, attempting to make progress towards a higher social order, in which the people equally share all goods out. Russia was renamed Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR).…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Post Soviet Privatization

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages

    On midnight of December 31st 1991, the Soviet Union collapsed, along with the communist ideals that it followed. The former the soviet union were forced to transition from a communism to a private government literally overnight, which is why it was referred to as spontaneous privatization. This abrupt economic reform cause problems with the people, as the government struggled to devise an efficient and fair way to distribute the wealth. The government wanted to take a democratic approach to mending the economy, so the plans they proposed promoted free market economy where the distribution of wealth is left up to the people, with a low amount of government interference. For people to distribute the wealth they must first obtain it, making this the first step in privatizing the former union.…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In order to contextualise the contemporary sources used in this enquiry, it has been necessary to consult secondary sources in order to provide the appropriate background. Here, the historian Michael Lynch maintains categorically that Stalin's economic policies did little to improve the life of the Russian people, giving them 'few benefits'. Taken from a book published after Gorbachev's 1985 Glasnost, a period of openness when the Soviet archives were opened up, Lynch would have been privy to vast amounts of evidence and statistics. Thus statements such as 'there is little evidence that they [Stalin's economic policies] provided the Soviet Union with the necessary capital growth' and 'there was never genuine…

    • 1864 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays