How Did Sherlock Committed A Crime

Imagine you committed a crime but were let free even though it is breaking the law for a police officer to do that. Sherlock Homes a detective that is beyond their technology that they should have used science to find evidence to crimes. In one of his stories he solved the crime about a missing carbuncle (jewel) and after he found out who did it he let them go like it was nothing. In my opinion Sherlock made the wrong decision. He should not have let them go for stealing it is illegal what he did. In the first place, Sherlock Holmes caught the two thieves that stole the carbuncle, a carbuncle is just a different way to say jewel. Sherlock knows himself that he committed a crime he just did not want to admit it because it would be breaking the
Sherlock had lacked of evidence with this theory but you cannot blame someone if you are not entirely sure you need more than just one thing to back up your theory. The Plumber had kids a wife and probably did not get payed a ton imagine if he went to jail what would happen to his family. In the third place, the two thieves can always commit another crime because the only person who could ever catch them was Sherlock. Since they already know that he exist they would have a plan for if he ever try to track the two thieves down again. Another thing is that if you got away with something you might try it again because the first time you did it it was successful. In Conclusion, I think all of these facts are enough evidence to prove my statement of Sherlock. So the three main reason why Sherlock Holmes did the wrong thing are. First of all, Sherlock let the thieves go after committing a crime. Seconded of all, He blamed the innocent plumber who had a family to look after. Third of all, Doing something and getting away with it could make you do it again since you got away with it. So I believe Sherlock Holmes did the wrong