The economic factors that were regarded under Stalin had a much greater impact on the Russian public negatively and had to be implemented at any cost. Furthermore, since Stalin regarded specific economic factors which he believed to have transformed Russia and the USSR, the peasants disregarded these economic factors since “starving peasants watched Communist officials sending food for export. Food production fell under these conditions and there was a famine in 1932-1933,” (Walsh, 2012). The economic factors of industrialisation and collectivisation by Stalin essentially ruined the Russian public socially and even economically. As seen by Stalin’s movements, food was exported to other countries as trade while the peasants of the Communist Russia were still starving. Moreover, by investigating the consequences of the regarded economic factors, overall in 1930 “between 5 and 6 million people had starved to death,” (Brooman, 1988). Broom clearly states that Stalin was successful to an extent but at what
The economic factors that were regarded under Stalin had a much greater impact on the Russian public negatively and had to be implemented at any cost. Furthermore, since Stalin regarded specific economic factors which he believed to have transformed Russia and the USSR, the peasants disregarded these economic factors since “starving peasants watched Communist officials sending food for export. Food production fell under these conditions and there was a famine in 1932-1933,” (Walsh, 2012). The economic factors of industrialisation and collectivisation by Stalin essentially ruined the Russian public socially and even economically. As seen by Stalin’s movements, food was exported to other countries as trade while the peasants of the Communist Russia were still starving. Moreover, by investigating the consequences of the regarded economic factors, overall in 1930 “between 5 and 6 million people had starved to death,” (Brooman, 1988). Broom clearly states that Stalin was successful to an extent but at what