Preview

How Did Stalin Affect The Soviet Union

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
511 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Stalin Affect The Soviet Union
During Stalin’s Soviet Union during, it is recorded that some economic factors were considered, while some were disregarded due to the uprising of industrialisation, collectivisation and command economy, which had effected the Russian population in a negative way. Industrialisation, collectivisation and command economy were to be seen as the major economic factors regarded by Stalin during his rule, as it helped and achieved his belief of “Socialism in One Country”. Understanding the concept of collectivisation by Stalin in 1929 is imperative to understand that these economic factors were regarded as acceptable under Stalin’s tyranny since he provided a negative control to the Russian public. The economic factors of industrialisation and collectivisation …show more content…
The economic factors that were regarded under Stalin had a much greater impact on the Russian public negatively and had to be implemented at any cost. Furthermore, since Stalin regarded specific economic factors which he believed to have transformed Russia and the USSR, the peasants disregarded these economic factors since “starving peasants watched Communist officials sending food for export. Food production fell under these conditions and there was a famine in 1932-1933,” (Walsh, 2012). The economic factors of industrialisation and collectivisation by Stalin essentially ruined the Russian public socially and even economically. As seen by Stalin’s movements, food was exported to other countries as trade while the peasants of the Communist Russia were still starving. Moreover, by investigating the consequences of the regarded economic factors, overall in 1930 “between 5 and 6 million people had starved to death,” (Brooman, 1988). Broom clearly states that Stalin was successful to an extent but at what

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    To a greater extent, I do agree that collectivisation was an essential contribution to stalin’s transformation of the economy, for example, it helped increase production and with it came the increase in industrialisation. Although there were many clear failures with collectivisation, in purely economic terms, it was mainly successful. However, I also think, that to a certain extent, it was other factors such as the 3 5 year plans that helped transform the economy.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Joseph Stalin Dbq Analysis

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Joseph Stalin established a modern totalitarian government in Soviet Russia. He is known as the “Man of Steel”. A totalitarianism is a type of government that takes total, centralized, state control over every aspect of public and private life of their people. His rule had changed the people of his empire in numerous ways. Stalin had total control over economic needs. According to document 6 “By 1940 Russia produced more pig iron than Germany, and far more than Britain or France. Numbers of cattle grew in the 1920s, but fell increasingly during the collectivization of agriculture after 1929, and by 1940 hardly exceeded the figure for 1920. Since 1940 the industrial development of the Soviet Union has been impressive, but agricultural production has continued to be plumiding”. The document illustrates how pig iron had significantly increased as a result of the “Five Year Plan”, however heavy industry led to expense of food supplies. This would cause limited production of consumer goods. It caused a step back because of the severe shortages of housing, food, clothing as well as other necessary goods. The Five Year Plan didn’t help much to excel their economic as Stalin hoped, it impacted by creating famine. Stalin rising to power promised an economic boom for Russia however, in that process many people suffered and died of starvation. According to document 5, “The purge began its last,…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the period before 1941, Stalin was able to institute his economical policies of Collectivization and the 5-year plans. ‘Backwards was to be defeated and enslaved’. Russia had to make up for 100 years of lost time for fear of being consumed by the western world. Stalin, sole leader of the Bolsheviks by the late 1920’s, believed that Russia could modernize their Agricultural and Industrial sectors through his policies.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin Dbq

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1917, Russia was crumbling into pieces. The World War I was draining all of Russia’s resources. There was shortage of food throughout the country, which left people starving. At the battlefront, millions of Russian soldiers were dying, they did not possess many of the powerful weapons that their opponents had. The government under Czar Nicholas II was disintegrating, and a provisional government had been set up. In November of 1917, Lenin and his communist followers known as the Bolsheviks overthrew the provisional government and set a communist government in Russia. However, in 1924, Lenin died and Josef Stalin assumed leadership of the Soviet Union, which was the name for the communist Russia. Stalin was a ruthless leader who brought many changes to the Soviet Union. Stalin’s goal was to transform the Soviet Union into a modern superpower and spread communism throughout the world, and he was determined to sabotage anyone who stood in his way. He used many methods such as collectivization, totalitarianism and five year plan’s to achieve his goals. Stalin’s rule brought both harmful and beneficial consequences to the Soviet Union; however, the negative factors were so terrible, that they overwhelm the positive factors.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stalinism, the term used to embody the form of government experienced by the Soviet Union under Stalin’s rule, had a significant and lasting impact on the USSR. Stalinism impacted on several aspects of life. Collectivisation was introduced which assisted in the funding of industrialisation, terror was used to create a communist state. Stalin centralised every aspect of life, from the single leadership of Stalin himself to party control of the state and its functions. Free will disappeared and service to the state was expected. Consequently a Stalinist state which had a major impact on the USSR was created.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1800 and 1939 Russia underwent through a severe regime change. The people of Russia were in a state of great economic disparity, and the lower class faced hunger, poverty, etc. The lower class had very little of the grain, land, and fiscal control that was available in Russia, such pretext of large income disparity gaps and unbalanced control of GDP were the pre-requisites se in place for the takeover of socialism. And such is what happened. Within this time period Russia went through a proletariat revolution of communism aiming have the workers of the world unite and free themselves from capitalist oppression to create a world run by and for the working class. However even though they underwent this major social-economic change, conditions in Russia stayed around the same. We still saw that Russia was under leadership of a Totalitarian authority. And maintained the same economic conditions where the consumer-based market never developed and the population was largely rural and the economy was agricultural based.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin - History

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How far was Stalin’s victory in the power struggle between 1924 and 1929 the result of the popularity of his policies?…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Collectivisation was Stalin's answer to his belief that Russia's agriculture was in a terrible state. Stalin believed that Russia had to be able to feed itself - hence collectivisation - and that at the very least the peasant farmers should be providing food for the workers in the factories if the Five Year Plans were going to succeed. There was barely any mechanisation, the use of scientific measures was minimal and peasant farmers produced usually for themselves and the local area. This was not good enough for Stalin.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    • In the Ukraine and other agricultural regions, Stalin punished resistance farmers by confiscating much or all of the food they produced. Millions of people died from starvation and millions more fled to the cities. • Stalin sent approximately 5 million peasants to labor camps in Siberia and northern Russia. • Stalin pursued rapid industrialization and by 1940 the Soviet Union was turned into a modern industrial…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under the governance of Joseph Stalin since 1928 saw the Soviet Union governing a large territory especially in the Eastern Europe and raising its importance as a world wide power throughout the Cold War. The Stalin system revolutionized the Soviet Union and turned out to be the foundation for the expansion of communist persuasion into the bordering regions and territories. The Stalinist system was distinct in that; it was a solitary party system governing political assignations, monetary policies, edifying activities, and offshore relations. It was crammed with totalitarianism, Stalin as the supreme head and it was an insidious system of police force reins, compulsory labor, and brutal oppression that saw millions of people killed and of…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under Stalinism industrialisation occurred in the cities through the building of factories and in the villages through collectivisation and the mechanisation of farming. It was through this that the Soviet Union became an economic powerhouse that was envied around the world. It was this that probably makes people feel the most sympathy for Stalin as he built the Soviet Union into a large empire that brought about a sense of pride in much of the…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We must remember to not brush over the negative aspects. First, Stalin developed his system of collective farming which combined once privately owned forms into large farms operated by the government. This put an end to individual profit and also an end to personal interest since the government had control of everything, As Stalin proclaimed in Document 4, he saids that with his new system, the state must come first, individuals second. Not only were the individuals of Russia undermined, they were tortured, executed or exiled if they dared oppose Stalin’s policies. Continuing with the system of collective farming, kulaks, rich farmers disliked Stalin’s system and openly resisted. Stalin immediately determined that the kulaks were a problem in his reign and that they must be eliminated. The kulaks were deported to forced labor camps or to Siberia. Stalin also used a forced famine in Ukraine to torture and control his people as stated in document 7. In addition, in order to control his population of people and provide positive views of himself, many posters such as the one shown in document 10 were shown to the public for that Stalin could gain liking. in addition, Stalin went as far as to use false trials to create and instill fear in his people. The accounts of the French ambassador as depicted the atrocities of such…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin’s reign of terror had a lasting impact that prevented Russia from moving forward at the speed it should have. Stalin started the Great Purges and used gulags as fear tactics to keep control, and his militancy cost money that could have been used elsewhere. These fear tactics left Russian politics paralyzed, even after the mass industrialization and urbanization of the country. Additionally, the money coming in from industrializing only went to further Stalin’s military exploits and even more industrialization. This industrialization could have aided the economy, but because Stalin focused so much on heavy industry, he instead damaged the economy, and this damage lasted for years to…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stalin himself justified his policy of rapid industrialisation and collectivisation at the 1926 Party Congress as one that sought to achieve ' the transformation of our country from an agrarian to an industrial one, capable by its own efforts of producing the necessary means of production.' This socialist notion of economic autarky, although admirable and unifying in its intentions, would indeed inevitably bring about damaging effects for the people of Russia. But how intensive and extensive was this damage - and was damage the only significant effect for the Russian people?…

    • 1864 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    My first point is that Stalin focused his efforts even more on the development of industry than ever before. The reason why Stalin did this was to rival the USA’s superpower status and therefore they focused on quantitative rather than the qualitative side of industry. Stalin wasn’t worried if the products they produced were any good as long as they met the 5 year plan targets then he believed he could compete with the USA. This showed as according to the statistics every planned target in 1950 was apparently met e.g. the coal target was 250 million tons which they surpassed and reached 261 million tons. Even the figures may have been exaggerated it is clear that the Stalinist approach had worked in terms of recovering from the war as well making significant progress in terms of producing goods.…

    • 1599 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays