Preview

How Did The Byzantine Empire Prevent The Battle Of Constantinople?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1197 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did The Byzantine Empire Prevent The Battle Of Constantinople?
After the death of Murad II, his son succeeded to the throne at the age of nineteen and vowed to his father that he will conquer Constantinople in order to surpass the glory that all his ancestors had. On the 30th of June 1453, “He seized the city by force of arms, killed the emperor of Constantinople, cut off the heads of many noble, gave the entire city over to plunder, and cruelly tortured many”, stated by the Letter of the Knights of St. John on Rhodes found on: https://apps.carleton.edu/curricular/mars/assets/Letter_of_the_Knights_of_St_John_for_MARS_website.pdf. This primary source explains how Mehmet II, the Sultan of the Ottomans and Conqueror of Constantinople, took over the great Byzantium city. Why didn’t the Byzantine Empire prevent the fall of Constantinople in 1453 C.E.? The Byzantine Empire didn’t prevent the fall of Constantinople in May of 1453 because they did not have …show more content…
In 1453 medicine was not as advanced as it is now, which led to many soldiers, wounded in the battle of Constantinople, to die from disease. The medical doctors that would treat the soldiers were not superb when it came to keeping away infections. Laurence Totelin reviewed the book Man and wound in the Ancient World: A history of Military Medicine from Sumer to the Fall of Constantinople, by the author Richard A. Gabriel, and he states, “He [Gabriel] discusses much more than disease affecting troops, sanitary issues, and the psychological impact of warfare” Totelin later says that Gabriel explains the reason why so many soldiers died was not only because of their infections and the disease, but because “Retrospective diagnoses of diseases can sometimes be very spurious” meaning that when the medical doctors were going to diagnose their patient (soldier) he would get the diagnoses wrong leading to wrong treatment which can ultimately cost a soldier his

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Ap World History Dbq Essay

    • 3685 Words
    • 15 Pages

    The Ottomans conquered Constantinople and ended the Byzantine Empire in what year? For seven weeks in the spring of 1453, the army of the Ottoman sultan, Mehmed II, “The Conqueror,” which numbered well over 100,000, assaulted the triple ring of land walls that had protected the city for centuries. The outnumbered forces of the defenders repulsed attack after attack until the sultan ordered his gunners to batter a portion of the walls with their massive siege cannon. Wave after wave of Ottoman troops struck at the gaps in the defenses that had been cut by the guns, quickly overwhelmed the defenders, and raced into the city to loot and pillage for the three days that Mehmed had promised as their reward for victory.…

    • 3685 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The doctors and nurses treating the wounded did not know about germs and bacteria so as they kept treating patients after patients, most likely never washing their hands, they didn’t know the deadly germs they were spreading. Bloody sponges and bandages were washed in buckets of dirty water and reused. More soldiers died from diseases then the battle fields.4 In general, for about every man who died from the battle fields, two died from disease. In their camps the soldiers were suffering to overcrowding, inadequate waste disposal, starvation and parasitic infestation. All these things could cause diseases like influenza and cholera to spread almost unchecked. Since there was no sort of antibiotic back then, even a minor wound could cause a major infection leaving the soldier dead within…

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many men and women were exposed to many diseases. During the Civil War, the Sanitary Commission aimed to keep any prison, hospital and even the battlefield clean as possible. Research has shown that some of 560,000 soldiers died not of wounds but of a disease. Whenever a soldier was in need of bandages the safe way was to wash and reuse them. By using the new bandages that had already been exposed to the diseases and germs they had a higher risk of contracting some disease or…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Black Death Dbq

    • 1961 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Plague Doctors were un-aptly named as they were ordinary citizens trying to benefit financially from the pestilence. Guy de Chauliac was a celebrated doctor, one who didn’t flee, despite, according to Pagel (taken from Puschmann's "Handbook of the History of Medicine”) “ecclesiastical interest” funded his medical education. Perhaps the Church’s adamant focus on Galen meant Chauliac was eager to expand on Galen’s ideas rather than disprove them, thus avoiding confrontation. The fact that the Black Death actually produced “the most eminent surgeon of the European Middle Ages” (Encyclopaedia Britannica) seems a great achievement, despite the fact that competition was sparse and de Chauliac’s achievements relatively few. In his book commonly known as “Chirurgia Magna” written in 1363, he cites the difference between bubonic and pneumonic plagues, describes hernias and cataracts, and treatments for all. In fact, he did have many surviving patients during the pestilence due to his realisation that “laudible pus” was necessary in the healing process of buboes and wounds. Surgeons were outraged as cauterization, an aggressive procedure, had always been the correct method and that the wound was never allowed to heal naturally. However, in his works he not only references Galen but also Hippocrates, Abulcasis and Ibn Sina (Avicenna) he only expanded on surgical practice already specified by others. Consequently, his influence is narrowed, and what seems like an abundance of progress is less so. In the long term it is of little significance, therefore the Black Death is not a turning point in surgical…

    • 1961 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One major issue that was noticed was infection in wounds. Infection was one of the causes of amputation being that soldiers lived in filthy trenches. They began to realize that antiseptics were not doing they job. With this knowledge they started to send chemist and physicians into battle to come up with a solution. Henry Dakin, a British biochemist, created a solution of hypochlorite which killed bacteria without burning the skin.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever gotten one of your limbs sawed off by some lady with a rusty saw? Probably not. If you have, sorry about that, but you’re not alone. A while ago, in 1861, the Civil War in the United States began. The deadliest war in American history, and it’s not because a bunch of boys were shooting each other with minié balls. It’s because medical hygiene didn’t exist until a few hundred thousand soldiers died of infections. Fortunately, someone figured it was a bad idea chopping off limbs and cleaning soldiers with dirty medical equipment. In the novel, Killer Angels, by Michael Shaara, we get an insight of what unhygienic conditions soldier’s had to face during the war.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compared to today’s standards, medicine in the Civil War was in the dark ages and barbaric as the stethoscope was not discovered until 1838. Most colleges taught only one yearly standard of lectures. Sitting through the same set of lectures twice in two years would result in graduation, and the ability to practice medicine. Not much was known about battle wounds, antiseptics, and sanitation since medical thinking was centered on the bowels and bladder during the 1800’s. The number of deaths in the Civil War totaled 624,571, due in part to the lack of sanitation knowledge and “no universally recognized professional standards for doctors,” existed. More deaths were caused from infections and disease accounting for two out of three deaths by the end of the war. In the 19th century, much of the medical…

    • 2131 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The diets of soldiers were malnourishing, which did nothing to help the immune systems of the worn down soldiers. The use of sterile dressings, antiseptic surgery, or even sanitation and hygiene was unheard of. A capable surgeon could perform an amputation in approximately ten minutes. The circumstances of these procedures were dangerous and unsanitary. The surgeons operated in coats stained with pus and blood while using bloody knives as scalpels and even fingers as probes. The lack of water, as well as time, meant there was no washing of the hands or instruments. The desperate times caused doctors to utilize houses, churches, schools, and even barns as surgery rooms.(Goellnitz.) Although doctors did everything they knew how to do, the medical practices just weren’t sufficient for the…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil War Medicine History

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Several early hospitals were unsanitary and were a breeding ground for diseases such as dysentery, malaria, and typhoid. Doctors possessed a primitive knowledge of antiseptic and sterilization; it was exceedingly rare for them to be seen cleaning their tools. This practice often led to infectious wounds, which turned gangrenous. When a wound was gangrenous, as it often was, or a soldier’s limb needed to be saved, physicians turned to amputation, which was a quick and efficient treatment in the Civil War. Contrary to popular belief, chloroform was equipped as a form of anesthesia, and surgeons were known to complete operations in ten minutes, allotting them more time to treat other patients. (Paul, para. 7). All of these early forms of battlefield medicine have helped to shape the medical community in one way or another. Without the rudimentary medical practices displayed above, modern medicine could not have developed into what it is…

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Diseases have long affected wars, often killing more soldiers than combat. During the War of 1812, for example, diseases like dysentery and malaria were the number one killer on the battlefield. Robert Koch’s germ theory was not introduced until 1890, so doctors had no reason to believe disease and infection was due to microscopic organisms or viruses. Treatments from the colonial era until the late 1800s show the extent of the misunderstanding of illnesses. Popular cures, such as bloodletting and a mercury compound called calomel, often left the patient weak and dehydrated, making them a prime target for further…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Poor hygiene in camps causes the disease to spread from soldier to soldier by contaminated food, water, and mosquitos. Fields hospitals treated large amount wounded soldiers which all kept together in unsanitary, poorly ventilated conditions which also contributed to spread of infections. Civil War surgeons did not understand germs, they had to work without knowledge about infections how they were carried and spread, and without drugs to treat it (Oshinsky 97). They performed surgeries without wearing gloves, sterilizing their tools, used bare fingers to inspect wounds, and simply wiped instruments clean using their aprons. The risk from surgery was great, resulting in high death rates from infections.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War Medical History

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Misconceptions about the brutality of military medicine in the Civil War often come from myths concluding that amputations, as well as common surgeries, were executed carelessly. Doctors were dealing with mass injuries that the world had never dealt with before. In the years before the war began, “Surgeons at one of the premier hospitals of the time, Massachusetts General Hospital were performing fewer than 200 surgical procedures of any kind on average per year” (Bishop). Within the first few months of the start of the war doctors who had no prior surgical experience were exceeding the number of procedures preformed by hospital experts in a matter of days (Barnes). By the end of the war, Union doctors had recorded almost 30,000 amputations…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Ottoman Empire lived longer than many states in the past because its lifetime was about six hundred. So, how did the Ottoman Empire survive so long? In my opinion, it was because of the diversity and religious tolerance in the Empire, a good administration, and military talents and techniques, so I can pick some of them to show them as the major historical legacies of the Ottoman Empire, such as the diversity and religious tolerance, and military talents and techniques. In addition to this, I can add the architectural works, for example Mimar Sinan’s architectural works, such as Şehzade Mosque and Sultan Ahmed Mosque (Blue Mosque). In general, the Ottoman Empire left some magnificent architectural works, such as mosques, madrasa, turbe,…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Now the disease did not arise because of the gods, but because of a natural reason. According to the Greeks, health completely dependent on lifestyle, environment and diet. Causes of diseases could be different: it was the influence of the season, climate, age, temperament, heredity. So, in the work about "Airs, waters and places", it was said that the doctor who comes at first time into an unfamiliar district, should study the climate, the soil, the way of life of the population. Only those who pre-examine the conditions of life in that place, who tentatively explores climate, lifestyle and other such things can successfully work as a doctor and treat the local population (Airs, waters, places, 148).…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Ottoman Empire was a successful frontier state, which was named from the Osman Bey. Being placed on the border of Byzantine empire, the Ottoman had the opportunity to wage war. In 1326, the Ottoman had their first great success by capturing the Anatolian city of Bursa. With this captured, Anatolian became one of the Ottoman principality. Adrianople became the second capital and also was place as the base for further expansion.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays