Taylor, a revisionist historian questioned the argument put forth by Lefebvre and eventually undermined the Lefebvre paradigm. He said “to call the French Revolution a “bourgeois revolution” loses most of its interpretive value” because the revolution was that of a political nature, not a social one. He believed that the French Revolution was a political revolution that had social consequences. This differs from Lefebvre because he believed that the revolution was a social revolution that had political
Taylor, a revisionist historian questioned the argument put forth by Lefebvre and eventually undermined the Lefebvre paradigm. He said “to call the French Revolution a “bourgeois revolution” loses most of its interpretive value” because the revolution was that of a political nature, not a social one. He believed that the French Revolution was a political revolution that had social consequences. This differs from Lefebvre because he believed that the revolution was a social revolution that had political