Preview

How Did The Senate Influence The Roman Government

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
542 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did The Senate Influence The Roman Government
The Roman Government consisted of Consuls and a Senate. Instead of having a king, the Romans chose consuls, two of them. The community elected neither of them but instead appointed by the popular assembly the Comitia Centuriata. Each consul serves one year, it's nonconsecutive, term, he could help a second or a third later. Consuls possessed supreme executive power, commanding the army, presiding over the Senate, the proposing legislation, but they could veto the others decision. At the end of their term, they were held accountable to the popular assembly for any decisions made. "Position open only to patricians, plebeians became eligible in 367 BCE and by 342 BCE legislation dictated that one of the two consuls had to be a plebeian"(Roman Government). The Senate had limited legislative jurisdiction; it's initially available only to the patricians, indirect exclusive power. It had no proper authority, and significant influence was continued, working for an advisory body to the representatives. Individuals of the conservative organization were voluntary and labored for life except finding guilty of …show more content…

"Most famous monarchies were those on states of Macedonia and Epeiros" Spartan maintained a private association, it is recognized for the arrangement of two kings. Kings were held in line by ephors who were as well selected by the assembly. Kings were declared at a young age. Spartan kings could be placed on trial and also exiled. Tyrants were single runners of a state who had attained control in an undemocratic way. They were the contradiction of capitalism for Athenians; this made them felt they had the advantage. An Oligarchy is an order of political power managed by particular individuals. Any system which prohibited the authority from the whole citizen body and wasn't a tranny or a monarchy was an oligarchy. This was the well-known kind of city-state government and happened when the government went

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Monarchy is defined as ‘a form of government with a monarch at the head’ and was the first arrangement of power in Rome after its founding by Romulus, who reigned from 753-715BC.1 However, by 510BC, the despotic actions of Tarquinius Superbus marked the end of a succession of increasingly tyrannical kings, and the ‘Roman Republic’ was established. This system was based on a sharing of power between, foremost, two consuls who were elected by the people and held office for only one year, then 300 senators, and two popular assemblies, the comitia curiata and the comitia centuriata. With such a spread of auctoritas, the Roman state would be at less risk from corrupt men with their aims set on an autocratic rule. The precepts of the Roman republic were honourable and upheld, in the most part, until the civil wars of 91BC onwards disturbed it, culminating in what many would consider the fall of the Republic, and thus the establishment of a monarchy, with Augustus at the battle of Actium on 2nd September 31BC.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman republic allowed all citizens to meet in assemblies to elect magis-trates. The most important legislative body was the Senate,…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The structure of the Republic and its underlying flaws, shown through individual actions, was integral to the weakening of the Roman Republic. This government consisted of two factions; the Optimate and the Populares. The Optimates were traditionalist politicians, who supported the republic and wished to minimize the power of the popular assemblies and the Tribunes of the plebs. The Populares represented the people and relied on the legislative assemblies and the Tribunate to gain power. The senate tended to side with the Optimates as there key interests coincided. They were perturbed with the idea of individuals rising through the assemblies, backed by their armies and the Tribunate. When Pompey wished to secure land for his war veterans in 62 BC, the senate blocked him, as they did not want him gaining power and challenging them. This relates to the relative power of the Senate and the assemblies. The senate could pass decrees in the form of advice. However if this conflicted with a law passed through the assembly, it would override the senates decree. The Senate had tried to undermine this power; yet, was restored under the consulships of Caesar in 59 and Crassus and Pompey in 55. As the republic declined, individuals used the tribunes and the assemblies for their personal gain. This is how Pompey and Crassus passed laws,…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rome and Han china

    • 3772 Words
    • 16 Pages

    2. Roman Senate: A council whose members were the heads of wealthy, landowning families. Originally an advisory body to the early kings, in the era of the Roman Republic the Senate effectively governed the Roman state and the growing empire. Under Senate leadership, Rome conquered an empire of unprecedented extent in the lands surrounding the Mediterranean Sea. In the first century B.C.E. quarrels among powerful and ambitious senators and failure to address social and economic problems led to civil wars and the emergence of the rule of the emperors.…

    • 3772 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sparta’s government was primarily an oligarchy, but it included democratic elements. Sparta had two kings, who came from two…

    • 6386 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rome and the US Government similar/different are that both roman republic and United States have a tripartite system. That means the government is made up of three branches. The three branches are legislative, judicial, and executive. Both governments have the power to veto. Veto means "i forbid" in the United States only the president has the power to veto.…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, Augustus reduced the size of the Senate. Instead of being above them he tried to work equally with them or place them and subordinates in his reforms. Because of the reduction, he was able to rid the Senate of incompetent senators. In order to join the Senate you were appointed by Augustus himself and the roles were received by hereditary. When you look at how Augustus created this system you're able to see that the Senate still had some power and it was shared with Augustus. Senate was in charge of appointing governors where as Augustus focused on military commanders. It was a sort of checks and balances system so that…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    tell me ab julius caesar

    • 622 Words
    • 2 Pages

    position in the Roman Republic. The consul was like a president, but there were two…

    • 622 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of the differences in the government of the United States and ancient Rome is the United States has a two party system, Democrats and Republicans, but Romans had an emperor. Within our two party systems a president is elected into office and the Romans chose an emperor based on their social status. Our president serves a four-year term and no more than two terms. Emperors had no term limits and served for life.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Omar Medina

    • 279 Words
    • 1 Page

    In a political aspect Rome had a more structured assembly. They had about 300 men and they served for life. The senate had primary responsibilities for foreign relations including selecting ambassadors, making treaties and creating alliances. The 30o members usually came from the oldest Roman families and inherited their seats. People were ranked into distinct classes. This ranking was based on wealth, heritage, administrative competence, martial status, and physical and moral fitness. This determined the citizen’s political privileges.…

    • 279 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government in Sparta

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Supposedly formed by Lycurgus, the government in Sparta is very unique in that it is an Oligarchy; combining monarchy, aristocracy and democracy.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leaders were elected by citizens and power was spread among several groups. The republic consisted of two consuls, three hundred senators, a citizens assembly, and courts. The consuls controlled the government and army, could veto each other and were elected for a one year term. The three hundred senators controlled the treasury, were lawmakers, made foreign policy, served for life, were chosen by the consuls, and were made up of Patricians. The citizens assembly was made up of all male Plebeian citizens who voted on laws and who was elected in the consul.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    n order to to participate in public life and make decisions affecting the community in Sparta it meant that you had to be a warrior. Sparta was a Oligarchy witch means "rule of the few". In Athens in order to participate in public life and make decisions you had to be native born, male and free. In Athens your political standing depended on you wealth. The men with the highest wealth could seek the highest political offices. The next step down the ladder were men with slightly less wealth referred to as the horse men. The horse men could serve in lesser political offices and join the army. The middle class could only be elected to low level political offices. The poor and the landless could vote but not hold office or be in the army however they could row the ships. Sparta had far fewer…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Romen Empire

    • 5600 Words
    • 23 Pages

    Under the new constitutional order, the basic government structure consisted of the princeps and an aristocratic senate which remained the chief deliberative body of the Rome. The decrees initiated by the Senate were screened in advance by the princeps. Augustus held the office of consul until 23 B.C. when he assumed the power of a tribune which gave him power to propose laws and veto any item of public business. By observing proper legal procedure, Augustus became very popular.…

    • 5600 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roman Government

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to legend, Rome was founded in 752 B.C. when Romulus ascended the throne as the first king. Unlike many monarchs, Roman kings could not pass down their crown to a relative. New kings were selected by the community leaders called patres and then had to be approved by the populous, the Roman soldiers who made up the Curiate Assembly. The patres also served as advisors to the king, helping him govern, and formed the group known as the Senate. The King had many duties, including commanding the army, handling foreign affairs, issuing laws, and serving as…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays