How Did Thomas Jefferson Have A Right To Receive His Rule

On the other hand, Thomas Jefferson was head of the Republican Party, and our 3rd president who expected John Adams (our second president) to fill in the vacancies before his term ended, and refuse to honor Adams wishes. John Adams decided to go against him, and fill in the positions with Federalists. Jefferson was unaware of Adams hires, and became upset when he found out that the entire Judiciary was filled with all his enemies, and an excessive number of judges of peace for Columbia. Madison, however; only appointed 30 representatives to be delivered, and denied the commissioner to the other twelve. This disappointed the federalists enough to joint together through the courts to abolish Jefferson, which made four of the commissioners of
On January of 1803, the case was argued, and Madison brought the case down to three questions. According to the video, the three questions stated, “Has the applicant a right to the commission he commands?” Madison specified, yes because he was suitably appointed, and just because it wasn’t delivered, the commission was prepared. The second question stated, “If he has a right, and that right has been violated, do the laws of this country afford him a remedy?” Madison specified that yes, it was one of the laws of the country, and that Marbury was provided the remedy upon bringing a law suit to receive his commission. The third question stated, “Is he entitled to the remedy for which he applies?” However, Madison answer was complicatedly given, and concluded that it was a suitable remedy. The conclusion to the case was that a writ of mandamus would not be issued, and he would not receive his commission after all and provided the Judicial Act of 1789 which still ruled the case unconstitutional. The Supreme Court decides which laws relate to the conclusion, and Marshall established the precedent, which now accepts the principle of Judicial rule ever