The notion of revolutionary literature circulating among the oppressed was not merely theoretical but a palpable reality. In the collective journey towards freedom, those destined to lead their brethren were, at that specific juncture, not visibly engaged in revolutionary activities. However, Toussaint Louvre emerged as a notable exception, immersing …show more content…
This ruling class, irrespective of leaders like Louvre or Dessalines, opposed the interests of the laboring classes and aimed to retain and exploit them within the revitalized plantation system. Césaire emphasized that on this crucial point, there was little difference between the leaders of the revolution. However, a question arises in the context of Negritude, which originally stood for the black revolt against slavery and white domination as well as self-determination. When the revolutionary leaders, including Louvre, sought to replace the exploitation of black masses by a white bourgeoisie with that of a black (and mulatto) bourgeoisie, Césaire's alignment became apparent: he sided with the