Preview

How Did Winston Churchill Change The World

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1045 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Winston Churchill Change The World
Through out history there have been a selected few individuals that have been given the strengths of leadership, bravery and wisdom to help them in their endeavors in changing the world. With their predefined idea of what they plan to do they go forth to illuminate the worlds' well being and enhancing the lives of the many people contained within it. A significant person which whom fit these qualities was once guided the Britains and the rest of the allies through a treacherous conflict was a guy named Winston Churchill. In his time guiding he showed and represented bravery and created hope for the people he lead. Winston Churchill had been an essential catalyst for their triumph over the axis powers and without him and the major change in …show more content…
He took three attempts to pass the entrance exams for the Royal Military College, Sandhurst, scoring just enough points to be admitted to the Cavalry, but not the Infantry.”(National Churchill Museum 1)In that day, the social class dictated the appropriateness of the profession. Only certain ones would be suitable for Churchill for he had felt that he was a man of great importance. To obtain these careers, he would need to successfully pass his courses in the University. However, his poor academic performance had a devastating effect narrowed his options, and through this narrow corridor of options he joined the Military. However, even in this field, his lack of dedication to learning only caused these options to narrow further. A various array of attempts were created in order to pass the entrance exams to the Royal Military College, in Sandhurst, scoring on the borderline just barely satisfactorily to join the Calvary. The Infantry and other departments were unfortunately out of his …show more content…
But he made a name for himself as a wartime leader. Though a bit old fashioned as viewed by some, he envisioned a world of united cultures, starting first with the English-speaking countries. “Churchill saw himself as a champion of democracy against tyranny, and was profoundly aware of his own role and destiny. Indeed, he believed that God had placed him on earth to carry out heroic deeds for the protection of Christian civilization and human progress”(New World Encyclepedia 1)
Churchill’s charisma spread to everyone who heard him, and was edified by the courage he displayed. From the moment he became Prime Minister, he led from the front sternly. “During the 1930s he had visited Hitler's Germany and seen for himself the potential for evil there. Few people, either in the UK or the US, wanted to know, and he often had a problem selling his articles about the evils of Nazism to the press.”(BBC 1). Churchill’s leadership continued into World War II. Upon visiting Nazi Germany, he witnessed the darkness for himself and could see the potential of the evil to spread. But this testimony was not well received in the US or UK. His articles were not well received about the evils of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    After about a year in the war Great Britain decided it was time to elect a more aggressive Prime Minister. In May of 1940 Winston Churchill replaced Neville Chamberlain as Prime Minister. That same month a large German offense forced British troops into one of the largest retreats in history, it was called the British Expeditionary Force from Dunkirk. During July through October in 1940, the English people suffered through the Battle of Britain. Extremely destructive German bombs rained down for months, however the Royal Air Force bravely defended their homeland from the Nazi machine.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Winston Churchill starts out his speech addressing the venue and the people who invited him to speak. He begins to foreshadow the possibilities of nuclear destruction and the immaturity of using such forces. He then falls into an outline of the countries involved in the war and his interpretation of their thoughts of everything going on. Commonwealth is a continuous topic throughout the address and is explained and used in multiple examples. Churchill also addresses the tragedies of war and the harmful affects it has on nations and their people. He concludes his speech with a call for action. He states that banding together will result in a clear future for generations to come.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On May 10, 1940, Winston Churchill became British Prime Minister. On May 13, he presented his angle on acquiring victory “at all costs”, and some contend that this “Blood, Toil, Tears, and Sweat speech is what made his career. This speech was given by Churchill on his entrance into the House of Commons with the presence of the outgoing prime minister. There has been controversy surrounding his intense speech regarding the multiple ultra-nationalistic statements he makes, however in this quote, he poses the effective idea that victory must be attained at all costs, even in spite of “terror”, and it is apparent that his intentions regarding his speech are to let the people of Great Britain know that he is dedicated to serving his country and…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The erosion of Neville Chamberlain’s# reputation was brought about quickly as his policy of appeasement failed to prevent WW2. The Cato# collective branded him as a criminal in the ‘Guilty men’#. Churchill# further reinforced this view telling the commons “England has been offered a choice between war and shame. She has chosen shame, and will get war.”#. These more orthodox views starkly contrast the reactions of the public and media pre-war. Hailed as a hero “Most newspapers supported Chamberlain uncritically, and he received thousands of gifts, from a silver dinner service to many of his trademark umbrellas.”#, with newspapers such as the Stockholm Tidningen# suggesting he receive the Nobel peace prize, Strasbourg renaming her streets overnight and the Telegram# concluding "Your name will go down in history as a statesman who saved civilisation from destruction”#. Ultimately appeasement, “the reduction of tensions between two states by the methodical removal of the principal causes of conflict and disagreement between them, which might otherwise lead to war.”# may not have been the only realistic option, but it was certainly an option and it was taken forward. Used as a synonym for weakness and ‘giving in’ in today’s world, there are Historians who argue that Chamberlain and his policy of appeasement was weak and lead to WW2 such as L.B. Namier, while there are also historians, such as A.J.P Taylor, who argue it was the only realistic option for him, during the years 1936-38.…

    • 2327 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    To look at how far was the success of the wartime coalition due to Churchill’s leadership, we must first look at what success means, the favourable or prosperous termination of attempts or endeavours. Churchill can be praised for winning the battle inside the Conservative Party for carrying on with the war against Germany, choosing a broad-based and effective coalition Cabinet, handling important and difficult allies such as Stalin, President Roosevelt and De Gaulle key in the success of the war with strong allies Hitler had nobody to look…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fdr and Winston Churchill

    • 2904 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Between the years of 1939 and 1945 the world was sent spiralling in a mess of corruption, violence and uncertainty. Allied powers were faced with the unparalleled task of protecting the world from tyranny. In terms of political power, this weight was bestowed upon the shoulders of two memorable individuals. By and large Winston Churchill and Franklin D. Roosevelt can be labelled as beacons of democracy and leaders of the free world in their time.…

    • 2904 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In his book Human Rights and Global Diversity, Robert Paul Churchill aims to identify and emphasize the universality of human rights, arguing that “human beings everywhere have the same human right” (Churchill xi). Churchill proposes that cross-cultural negotiations must be implemented to bridge the gap between cultural differences and gain international consensus of The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). With respect to valuing the UDHR and promoting universal human rights regardless of culture, the best method of cross-cultural negotiation is the transformational strategy. This method would be the most successful because its broad use of human rights language allows for worldwide communication and participation, thus eliminating…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Winston Churchill is often considered one of Great Britain’s most important and effective leaders during World War 2. There are many reasons for this. Even though Churchill had remained outside of government for a period of time, he made speeches warning of Germany’s growing power. He also spoke out openly against Neville Chamberlain, the British Prime Minister, plan’s for appeasement with Nazi Germany. However, when Nazi Germany attacked Poland the public saw that Churchill knew this was going to happen. Just two days after the attack on Poland Churchill was once again made First Lord of the Admiralty. When Nazi Germany attacked France it was time for a new leader. Appeasement had not worked and on the same day that Chamberlain resigned King George VI asked Churchill to become the new Prime Minister. Churchill was what Britain needed, he was a strong speaker and did whatever it took to get his side to win whatever the matter. Three days after becoming Prime Minister he delivered one of his most famous speeches titled, “Blood, Toil, Tears, and Sweat.” This speech along with many others is what provided Britain with the morale boost they…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Winston Churchill was a talented man; he had a very interesting early life with his family and education. His careers were short from going to military to a civilian world to the government. He ended his career with a pretty good end until he started getting ill. The British Prime Minister had a very long and eventful life full of adventure.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All three of these men understood how to communicate with their audiences. They bring about the problem and a general sense of direction without listing specifics to inspire and motivate. In Churchill’s address from to the commons he is discussing the strategies and asking for support from the government for the war effort. He starts out the speech but listing low points to the war and how very personal these events are to those present.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Who Is Winston A Hero

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Winston is nobody who is important in the book. He’s not the leader of an opposition party nor a Revolutionary ring. He’s not a high official of the system. He’s just a worker. The actions of Winston’s are Not big revolutionary actions either.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When you read this story you have to understand that it was in 1984 and it was a wake up to the spread of communism that was going to happen, he wanted the perfect community with mind games and only little vocabulary. He wanted it to be just like he wanted and It was starting. But the question was do I think Winston Smith was a hero by George definition? No I do not think he was a hero even though he did well for everyone and helped them with things they needed. The stuff that he did gave him hope that he could overthrow the government. Winston just did all of the things so he could have the feel of being a rebel but he would have just tried to do it right him could have really made a difference in this world and I don't think he even noticed it at the time we was doing all of the stuff for the people. My opiopion is that if he would of left his rebel stage out of it and actually helped the people because he cared then I would of considered him a hero even though he didn't fit the profile of a hero but looks always deceive you and even the smallest person on the earth could be a hero it’s about your heart and all the good you have inside of…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you heard someone say that Winston Churchill is the greatest prime minister in Britain’s history? They may be right based on his actions during WWII. Winston Churchill was on the right with everything he did during the war as he did it all for his country and resulted in their side winning the war. However, it is important to note that Churchill's legacy is not without controversy, particularly regarding his views on imperialism and race. Some argue that his actions and policies have caused harm in certain parts of the world.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through his commitment to being honest and loyal to his people, he could make anyone a believer. Churchill had the courage to speak the truth and he always told people how he felt, and he never held anything back. Churchill had the guts to speak the truth when the odds were stacked against him and the risks were high.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    flight, and any moment in time the arrow takes up a certain place in space. Before the flight, it was in a different place and later on it was in a different place in space but in the present moment when the arrow was in flight, it was there. But, if it was at the place in space when it was in flight and not somewhere else then that means it wasn’t moving. Therefore no motion was taking place. He states the same conclusion as the previous argument which was the same as the first argument, the Dichotomy that motion is nonexistent.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays