Preview

How Do Drones Combat Terrorism?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
895 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Do Drones Combat Terrorism?
Overall, the last decade and a half have been forgettable and largely a mistake on the US’s behalf. The entire war on terror failed as a whole with ground troops fighting despite early success with the defeat of the Taliban in Afghanistan following 9/11. Yet, afterwards, the Taliban resurged and the USMNT did little to quell this resurgence. In Afghanistan, more than three hundred thousand Afghan civilians died during the bombing campaign(Choices 187), demonstrating a horrible and tragic failure on the US’s behalf to bring freedom and security to civilians where these terrorists were in control. Furthermore, in Pakistan, in 2009 alone, another twenty-five thousand Pakistanis were killed by militants as well as hundreds of soldiers(Choices 196), …show more content…
The new CIA technology, which Obama has frequently used during his terms as president, has been very effective in killing terrorists with their use in Pakistan. Although many people oppose the use of drones, the ratio of civilian deaths to the deaths of terrorists is much lower than ratio of civilian deaths to terrorist deaths per the CIA analysis(Choices, 225). Morally, however, drones have received lots of criticism with people like Scott Shane from the NY Times saying, “drones may actually be encouraging unnecessary killing.”(Choices, 226). Others, such as Daniel R. Brunstetter further this idea by saying that drones are becoming, “a default strategy to be used almost anywhere.” Many people believe that President Obama’s frequent use of drones is highly immoral but the numbers speak for themselves and as Bradley J. Strawser, a Naval Academy assistant professor points out, “all the evidence we have so far suggests that drones do better at both identifying the terrorist and avoiding collateral damage than anything else we have”(Choices, 225). Drones are really the moral high ground for war, an irony in itself, but nevertheless true. Drones are the only combat policy that America has used during the war on terror that has been …show more content…
The US’s investments in these countries to rebuild and especially in Afghanistan, which has “no industry or manufacturing sectors to speak, and it depends on importing the goods it needs from other countries,” has not worked out very well. Rather, the 35 percent of the unemployed Afghani’s have turned to the illegal “poppy economy” which is the only growing industry in Afghanistan(Choices, 197). The US has succeeded with the training of military and police in Afghanistan but failed by allowing blatant corruption in the Afghanistan government surrounding President Karzai. President Karzai’s reelection was targeted by accusations of electoral fraud, cheating, and intimidation which the US should have investigated if they were really determined to bring democracy to Afghanistan. As Ban Ki-moon, secretary general of the UN points out, “Afghanistan now faces significant challenges and the new president must move swiftly to form a new government that is able to command the support of both the Afghan people and international community,”(Choices, 198). Really, the US’s policy although it has good intentions lacks in these countries and the US needs to increase its foreign aid funding in these countries which it has ravaged by its war on

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Rex Murphy’s essay, “What We Are Fighting For,” strives to outline the reasons behind the Canadian governments’ continued deployment of troops to Afghanistan. Murphy reviews the initial reasoning for deploying troops overseas, then continues on to explain that simply disbanding the Taliban government is insufficient. He indicates that the UN led mission is also implementing peacekeeping measures, and Canadian troops, as Peacekeepers remained. Murphy outlines the ambitious peacekeeping goals and provides insight into civil liberties those of us from democratic nations, often take for granted. The author then delves into the intricacies and obstacles faced in attempting to install a democratic government in a country still under threat of Taliban…

    • 223 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his essay” What are we fighting for,” Rex Murphy discusses what he sees as the most compulsory reasons Canadian troops are in Afghanistan, to support some form of democracy that can resist malevolent influences and provide for its citizens, basic civil opportunities. Murphy begins his discussion with recapping the events leading up to our involvement in the Afghanistan operations, primarily 911, and supporting our ally, the United States in removing a government that supported such atrocities. The Afghanistan mission, which was UN approved, was intent on, most importantly, removing the Taliban and providing stability for its citizens through better government. However, Murphy discusses how without support a new government is not sustainable…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On September 11, 2001, everything changed. Terrorism had never been seen on such a massive scale. As a result of the massive attacks on U.S. soil, changes had to be enacted. The fight against terror was now a global war effort. The War on Terror was not a popular choice, but it no one expected it to go on for this long. It is now being fought by technology, which led to the drones being used against U.S. citizens suspected of terrorism. The president can authorize these strikes with the claim that these citizens pose an imminent danger to the security of the United States. However, the Obama administration’s definition of imminent threat is vague and without oversight or any checks and balances. There are various military, governmental, and ethical concerns regarding the use of drone strikes ordered by the president. The use of drones is valid, but the administration has not presented any valid defense of their tactics, which paints a poor picture of Oval Office tactical policy.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    CIA drone strikes have the potential to decimate terrorist organizations in an inexpensive manner and reduces boots on the ground combat for American soldiers. Though, we need expansive and additional congressional oversight of drone strikes and CIA targeting. The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) is devoted to regulating and reviewing every aspect of the drone program, however, committee members are often met with denial and restriction of information. We need to make sure our drone program is met with regulation and preemptive strikes must be strictly reviewed in a legal manner prior to, in order to prevent the endangerment of innocent civilians, radicalization and mobilization of extremest retaliation, and to preserve the reputation…

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just because we have the technological power to use drones to take people/things out, that does not necessarily mean that we should. The main concern being brought up, that while we as a nation may have always killed people with a certain form of ease in the name of war, it has come at a high cost. It is expensive, and not too easy. However, with this drone system it is easier, less expensive, and does not require so much blood shed. This is an area of concern because this may become us as a nation to become much more relaxed when it comes to moral…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Warfare, enacted by George Bush and expanded on by President Obama to provide a haven for Americans against the terrorist group, al-Qaeda. The use of weaponized unmanned surveillance drones allowed for far better independent targeting decisions, rather than retrieving intelligence from sources within the real country where the warfare would take place. These strategic implications created a question among Americans, is the use of drones to target individuals right? This question has arisen due to a high number of civilian casualties, making it seem inhumane to do. However, Kenneth Anderson provides readers a strong argument as to why drone warfare is strategically effective in his article, “The Case for Drones” with his organization pattern,…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Drone Strikes are popular tools of all countries, especially the United States, seeking to neutralize suspected terrorists. Even though the American public is divided on the issue and the Pakistani public, where U.S. drones have been used the most, is sternly against the use of drones, they remain the weapon of choice for our military. This started with the Bush Administration in the early 2000s, the U.S. government has attacked hundreds of targets in northwestern Pakistan alone. Regardless of the moral or ethical questions, drone strikes…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The war in Afghanistan started after the September 11th, 2001 attacks in the United States while President Bush was in office. President Obama was inaugurated as president on January 20th, 2009 and he picked up in the middle of a long war in Iraq and Afghanistan. After taking office, General Stanley McChrystal was selected to command NATO operations in Afghanistan. McChrystal submits a detailed report, to then Defense Secretary Robert Gates, calling for a surge of 30,000 – 40,000 troops in Afghanistan. The general’s assessment reflects the “Polis Model” in that he writes “success demands a comprehensive counterinsurgency (COIN) campaign” and further writes “failure to gain the initiative”, “risks an outcome where defeating the insurgency is no longer possible”. This assessment gives the portrayal that increasing the troop count in Afghanistan is the only feasible option and that any other method would result in failure. To make matters worse, McChrystal’s 66 page assessment…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drones In Warfare Essay

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Should drones be used in warfare? It’s necessary to learn about drones—what they are, and how they are used—before determining the answer. The Air Force calls them Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, or simply UVAs. There are dozens of them flying over countries like Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq, providing intelligence and surveillance. Since September 11, 2001, the US has been fighting the “War on Terror”, in which drones are used to kill suspected terrorists. Drones have changed the pattern of warfare and military outcomes.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    911 Term Paper

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages

    President George declared a war on terror shortly after the attacks on the world trade center and the Pentagon. The U.S. gave the Taliban and the Afghan government an ultimatum to turn over Osama Bin Laden and they refused. The US and NATO invaded and the Taliban government was toppled in eight weeks with the help of the Northern Alliance. The U.S. continued to punish and pursue Al Qaeda into the mountains and surround them. Our military was within weeks of crushing Al Qaeda when the Bush Administration shifted focus to Iraq. This created a vacuum that led to an Al Qaeda resurgence. The U.S. loosing focus on Afghanistan angered our Pakistani ally. A decade later we our no closer to winning the war in Afghanistan than we were in the beginning. Even with Bin Laden dead American casualties have sky rocketed from 270 in 2008 to 3,371 last year. We are now left in a quagmire in Afghanistan because we failed to complete the job in Afghanistan, while fighting an unneeded expensive war in Iraq. (Hirsch)…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Home Analysis

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Drones are capable of being used by terrorists and other criminals for their bad intentions. For example, in the article “Drone Home” on page 7, Lev Grossman points out the possible security concerns revolving the domestic use of drones.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the attacks on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001 and various other terrorist threats, the United States has used unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), or drones, to eliminate terrorists or potential terrorists. The US should continue using and developing drones as combat weapons because they have less collateral damage than impractical alternatives, keep our own troops safe, and aide military generals with photography and mapping of foreign countries. Moreover, because UAV's cannot guarantee the safety of the innocent bystanders, drones obtain the reputation of creating more terrorists than they tend to eliminate and not only do drone strikes violate the sovereignty in other countries, they also violate the rights of basic human rights. Consequently, drones may be perceived differently in the eyes of Americans and Pakistanis.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Usage in America

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Drone use within the United Stated of America has been a very controversial topic of the recent times; therefore, this article is being written to say why drone usage has become so controversial in our country, and all over the world.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Picture yourself as a soldier, you're walking through the dry hot air with the sun beating on your sweat drenched skin. As you walk on your patrol you see an enemy convoy armed to the teeth and ready for anything that comes at them. You call it in to your superior officer then moments later you hear that buzz in the air, the buzz that everyone knows. You look up to see the hostile convoy in panic. Next thing you see is a flash of fire and debris flying through the air. You see it, The U.S. Air Force MQ - 1 Predator Drone. This drone is the one of many drones used in combat situations by governments all over the world. The Air Force pilots who control this type of drone nicknamed them “St. Nick.” They call it this because “It brings down hell on the naughty and protects the good.” Said Air Force Chief Scientist Mica Endsley. (Military) If one unmanned combat drone can do the work of ten military soldiers without the chance of one of the soldiers getting injured or dying, then I’m all for military drone use. Even though our military uses drones to kill hostiles in foreign countries this does not mean that drones all together are bad. In saying this I decided to dive deeper into the use of drones in not only the military aspect but also the private sector and recreational…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Strikes

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After reading this article about the drone strikes and looking into other articles about drone strikes I am in favor of drone strikes that effectively hit the target without civilian deaths; (which is the major criticism of drone strikes) but not in favor of the power and strength our government is expressing while these strikes get used. These drone strikes are the centerpiece of the Obama administrations counter terrorism policy especially in Pakistan and Yemen. However though using these drone strikes as a part of our “counter terrorism policy” is hypocritical because like one the respondents to the article said “If Obama cannot understand that to wage terror is to invite terror then I for one can no longer believe in him.” This respondent is right, if America as a nation is going to be using these drone missile strikes on terrorists but end up killing a few civilians in the process is that moral? The continuous killing does not eliminate nor stop hatred towards the United States, in fact I think it makes the hatred stronger and other countries more inclined to recoil. Not only are these drone strikes not ethical or moral neither is this “disposition matrix” Obama has created to determine who will be executed (by drone strikes) without due process. This “kill list” Obama invented was started because he refused to detain terrorist suspects, instead his solution is to just kill them at will. This strikes several issues starting with our executive branch in this instance is over stretching not only their power but there right to act in this manner without going through proper policies. With this kill list keep getting added to either monthly or how ever often, is it even effective? Or just a way for the government to flex there power over the nation and too other nations. It’s a little of both in this circumstance, using drone strikes shows other nations we have the technology to strike all over the world whenever at the push of button,…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays