Preview

How Does Hobbes View Of Human Nature

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
759 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Does Hobbes View Of Human Nature
Pico della Mirandola was a humanist who wrote the Oration on the Dignity of Man, which commemorates human nature. In his book, Oration on the Dignity of Man, Pico argues that human beings are free to become whatever they choose. Pico believed that the source of human freedom is God. Humans were placed by God in the middle of the chain of being. They are “neither of heavenly nor of earthly stuff, neither mortal nor immortal,” and humans are free to choose the place they want to be on the chain of being. Above them are the angels and below them are the animals, and they can choose to go up the chain or down. The noblest goal of this freedom is to strive to go up the chain of being and “strive after the highest and expend all our strength in …show more content…
Thomas Hobbes, a philosopher who wrote Leviathan, argues that human beings are selfish and therefore need a higher authority appointed to protect them from one another. The similarities between Hobbes’ views of human nature and those of Luther are that they both believe that human beings need an authority figure to stop them from doing evil. Hobbes states in Leviathan that freedom means that human live in a society where “… they are in that condition which is called war; and such a war as is of every man against every man.” This illustrates that human beings are greedy and use violence to get what they want. This freedom makes them commit the acts of the devil. Luther agrees with this because in The Bondage of the Will, he states that “…in the face of so many dangers, and adversities, and assaults of devils, I could not stand my ground and hold fast to my free will.” He knows that if humans are able to do anything that they want they are more likely to commit sins because there is no higher authority guiding them. They also believe that this freedom will lead them to death. Hobbes states that in a free world there is the “…danger of violent death,” because people want to fulfill their desires. They constantly have to fear one another and therefore cannot live this beautiful life that is given to them. Luther is also in favor of this idea; he states that with freedom “…every one of us would perish” because we will more likely to commit the act of sins. Therefore, they both believe that there should be order. Luther believes that order should come from God whereas Hobbes believes that there should be a monarch with absolute

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1. the scholar Pico created the Oration on the Dignity of Man, which he referred to as a manifesto of humanism. In this work, he touted the power of free will and the boundless potential that individuals may realize through reason.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The understanding of human nature and the effects it has on the individual and society has been a serious topic in the philosophical world. Nicolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes were well known for their crucial roles in forming the foundation of political philosophy. While reading through Machiavelli’s The Prince and Hobbes’ Leviathan, both introduced a common focus on political theory even though living approximately 100 years apart. While learning about these two philosophers and their proposed theories, I noticed an innate relationship in the discussion of society’s human nature. Machiavelli ([1532] 2006) in The Prince theorizes the qualities that a dominant leader should have to gain and maintain power.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher of the 1600’s that tried to create a basis for politics. Having experienced the English civil war, Hobbes realized that the conflict was the result of human nature. Hobbes exclaimed that the world was full of greedy people and those who are selfless and care only for themselves. Without the government to maintain order, Hobbes said that there would be “a condition of war of everyone against everyone”. Hobbes noted that in order to stop this, the people would have to sacrifice their freedom for the government. In exchange, they gained law and order. He also notes that this sacrifice would allow the government to suppress any form of rebellion. Hobbes called this agreement the social contract.…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phi-286 Mod 3 Wa 1

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes lived during revolutionary times, beginning with the overthrow and demise of the English King, Charles 1, in 1641 (Newton, 2004). Hobbes writings of 1651 are documented with an influence from these events, while being credited with transition from medieval to modern thinking in Britain. Although Hobbes post-revolutionary treatise ultimately depended on accepting an absolute monarch, which contradicts present day philosophy, still, Hobbes is credited with the notion of a person's natural rights. Hobbes theory depicts the right of self-preservation, by stating a person may do whatever needs to be done to save their life and to procure the means to live (Newton, 2004). Hobbes' rather straightforward approach suggests that every man is an enemy of every man (Newton, 2004) and the worst that can happen to anyone is a violent death at the hands of others. Citing natural rights, Hobbes therefore indicates we have the right to prevent a violent death from taking place through self preservation, by taking action against those who may or may not harm us. Hobbes theory of mankind illustrates a violent, short, and solitary life, which arises perhaps his most powerful work. Hobbes identifies just how little humankind rarely uses good judgment. These ideals of natural rights, human judgment, and society set in motion a foundation, which would be expanded upon by…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes, an Enlightenment philosopher, claimed that mankind is naturally evil and selfish and will cause conflicts “if any two men desire the same thing, which they nevertheless cannot both enjoy” or have differing opinions, in order to gain more power so that they can freely pursue their selfish desires, especially “during the time men live without a common power” and “in that condition which is called war, every man against every man,” and are therefore incapable of self-governing. Hobbes’ position on human nature is easily observable; intolerance and bigotry causes violence and general public…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 18

    • 1729 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Hobbes.
Thomas Hobbes. (1588-1679). ‘Born premature when mother heard of oncoming Armada.’ At 40, he took Euclid’s geometry as starting point to make mechanical model of universe (man and society). Mechanism (based on motion) was to greatly influence thinking over next few centuries. Witness to upheaval of civil war in England in 1640s. Fled to France. 1651. Publishes "Leviathan.”Hobbes sees state of nature sans government as "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." Promulgates absolute monarch thesis. Says people (wholly selfish) should escape chaos of everyday life, give up their freedom to ruler who guarantees peace and order. In his state Hobbes saw ruler as absolute with men having no right to rebel since this would break the social contract and be illogical.…

    • 1729 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many philosophers, such as John Locke and Thomas Hobbes, have discussed over the years if he human race is naturally good or evil. People than choice their side of the argument, one side believing that humans have a basically good nature that is corrupted by society, while the other side believes that humans have a bad nature that is kept in check by society. As John Locke believes that the human race is good, it is reasonable to accept as true because we are born neutral, with free will, and fear of a higher power.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hobbes talks about his view of Human Nature in his book The Leviathan. His central belief was built around the idea that the nature of humanity leads people to seek power. He believed that humans naturally desired the power to live well, and that human beings will never be satisfied with the power they currently possess unless they acquire more power. Hobbes defined power as” the ability to…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Our task must be to free ourselves by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature and its beauty.” Albert Einstein. I think we can learn a lot from this quote.All people are supposed to be treated equally, and have the same rights as everyone else. What freedom means to me is to be able to say,believe,and make our own choices without being judged or harmed.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One question that resonated in my mind after re-reading the Theogony was: though humans are below the Gods and Goddesses (in universal importance), are humans truly above animals in the same way God is over man? It is unarguable that animals and humans are equal in the respect that both are mortal (395; “…mortal man…” and animals are slaughtered and offered as sacrifices) but if we examine the Theogony through refined eyes, we see that there are situations in which both parties merit the title of the “superior”.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hobbes vs Locke

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Both Hobbes and Locke shared similarities within their political theories; however their theories also had some major differences. Both men were responding to the crisis of the 17th century and they were highly influenced by the scientific revolution. Hobbes and Locke rejected all previous theories regarding human nature. They used the same methodology, and the men accepted an atomistic view of society. They believed that individuals were rational and were motivated by self-interest. Hobbes and Locke traced their theories from a state of nature to the social contract. They agreed that the legitimacy of the government rested on the consent of the governed. Together, both men rejected legitimate political authorities such as Divine Right of Kings, brute force, historical tradition, and feudal contracts. Both political philosophers offered interesting arguments pertaining to government, human nature, and the state of nature.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Leviathan, Hobbes attempts to explain how civil government came to be established. He begins his argument at the most logical place; the fundamental basis of mankind, and makes several key steps in the development of human nature to reach the implementation of a sovereign ruler. Hobbes believes the foundation of mankind is motion. Man is in constant motion and the instability that forms from the collisions that ensue from the constant motion form the state of nature. The state of nature is an inherently dangerous lifestyle, where all members live in a state of constant fear. This fear drives man to consent to a social contract, which establishes a peaceful existence. The social contract is ultimately enforced by the sovereign ruler who uses fear of punishment to ensure man follows the laws created. Man essentially gives up one type of fear for another in an attempt to better human life.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes believed that a tyranny is a better government than anarchy. He believed this because with anarchy, the country would be in order and there will be subjects that would not be able to rebel. He had felt that citizens had to give up all rights while under a government and be under a social contract. Thomas Hobbes also felt that people did not have the right to rebel. In England’s society during the Civil War, it would make the parliamentarians because they were rebelling against the monarchy. Also, Thomas Hobbes believed that people should not summit to a government if the government does not protect them, which made people loyal to the monarchy look bad. Also, Thomas Hobbes had many views on how religious organizations can be run. He believed that the sovereign could decide what the religious or any other organizations can be run by. In his book, Leviathan, Hobbes’s materialistic ideology was key in this text has it described how government can save mankind from civil war with loyalty. In the text, Hobbes believed that a state without government is “nasty and brutish” because it is an anarchy and had no order. The book had an influence on atheists because it spoke of many points of atheistism. It was banned by the non-secular government of England because it was believed to have corrupted the young people. Thomas Hobbes believed…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Locke Vs Hobbes Essay

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The battle between Hobbes and Locke still continues today through their influence on governments and how they believed government should work. Hobbes believed in an absolute monarch where they were to demand obedience in order to maintain order. On the other hand, John Locke thought that a Democracy was a better form of government provided that they had the right information to make. This form of government allows the people to keep their natural rights rather than giving them up in exchange for protection by the monarch. As a result of their views on human nature and what form government should take, it is easy to see why Lockean government is more powerful than Hobbesian by looking at past governments in history as well as logically.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas hobbes theory of human nature is proven by the hunger games , because of killing and the people's bad behavior. The annual hunger games are based off of bad human nature. In the book , the book quotes “ Taking the kids from our districts, forcing them to kill one another while we watch”. ( 1.76)…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics