From the beginning of the relationship it is already understood that we have freedom as humans, so long as our actions do not harm the other person involved in the relationship, this is implied in Equality and generally accepted as a concept by parties involved. Nowhere is the concept of equality more radical than in the ideas of Marx and his Communist Manifesto, decrying the bourgeoisie for its unremorseful control and force of their liberty on the ever growing proletariat. The person who stood me up is the “bourgeoisie, [and] therefore, produces, above all…its own grave-diggers. Its fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable”. Assuming this person continuously repeats this cycle of standing up their dates a group of people will form, decrying the unethical treatment of human beings. Equality eventually demands itself to be heard in these types of situations, whether it be personal relationships or struggles between economic classes. Communism lends the idea that the “liberal society of representative democracy combined with free market capitalism represents oppression rather than freedom for the vast majority of those living under it”. The key component here being the liberty with which the Bourgeoisie set up these systems of unregulated trade using the proletariat as pawns for their liberal ideals, but inequity grows here and is ignored to a point where the date analogy will repeat itself, revolution begins and equality is demanded. A strong central government that people discard complete liberty to in the name of complete equality sounds too idealistic, and downright utopian, but the verisimilitude of that is not what is important. The importance lays in the attempt of equality. Even Hobbes, cynical as he was, believed “from this equality of ability ariseth equality of hope in the attaining of our ends”. Equality promises that…