Knowledge affects the way I see things because as I have already backgrounded knowledge I already know and believe what’s going to happen so that way it affects the way I see things and perceive the world. Let’s talk about example, when I was hearing that “Baa Baa” I just perceive that he was saying baa baa because of his lip movement but when I heard the same thing without visual images I heard the same thing because I think my mind was so convinced by visual images and in the way of knowledge it was already fixed in my mind so that didn't allow me to think another way around. That also makes Panchatantra saying true as we need to believe things to in order to perceive it the way we want. So I have to agree with Panchatantra as my eyes see only what the mind is prepared to comprehend.
The another example that makes me agree with Panchatantra is in Ms. …show more content…
Someone might give an example of a growing baby. Someone might say while the baby is growing like 5 yrs. old they don't have any kind of knowledge, but they learn things from watching their parents and other people. That could be a strong argument that someone might make to prove Panchatantra saying incorrectly. As he said in his saying knowledge is the true organ of sight, not the eyes. As I already said that someone might say baby don't have any kind of knowledge, but they learn things from watching through the eyes to their parents and other