Huck is inspecting the art of Emmeline and expressing his feelings about them in the text. If you read Huck’s explanations without examining the underlying meanings you will find that Huck is completely clueless as to the artists’ sentimental intentions. He evaluates one picture called “Shall I Never See Thee More Alas” by describing a woman “under a weeping willow” (Twain 119) in a graveyard, another picture with a woman “crying into a handkerchief” (Twain 119), and yet another with a crying woman about to jump off a bridge. All three of these illustrations are obvious clichés of sentimental art of the 19th century. Huck looks at the images and simply sees “nice pictures” (Twain 119), not realizing the intent of the artist, Emmeline. This is an excellent example of Huck’s role as the naïve narrator. His lack of understanding provides a completely different take on the art than Mark Twain actually
Huck is inspecting the art of Emmeline and expressing his feelings about them in the text. If you read Huck’s explanations without examining the underlying meanings you will find that Huck is completely clueless as to the artists’ sentimental intentions. He evaluates one picture called “Shall I Never See Thee More Alas” by describing a woman “under a weeping willow” (Twain 119) in a graveyard, another picture with a woman “crying into a handkerchief” (Twain 119), and yet another with a crying woman about to jump off a bridge. All three of these illustrations are obvious clichés of sentimental art of the 19th century. Huck looks at the images and simply sees “nice pictures” (Twain 119), not realizing the intent of the artist, Emmeline. This is an excellent example of Huck’s role as the naïve narrator. His lack of understanding provides a completely different take on the art than Mark Twain actually