How Does Peaceful Resistance Of Laws Positively Or Negatively Impact A Free Society

The word free society is a very loose word, when used in a context so strong. People who resist the law, are they considered free? People who abide by everything, are they considered good people? Rosa Parks made a mark in history with her civil disobedience, and at the time it was wrong. Yet today, it has positively impacted our free society. She didn't peacefully abide by any law, she did what she thought to be right. Right and wrong, good and bad, these questions permeate our minds. Some instances in history we tend to loose our way of life, we rebel, not for the books, but for ourselves. We host things like revolutions, and fight for our justice. We call our selves a free society, but how far can those words take us? No one can be the judge, and tell us what free means. Breaking the law makes us a criminal, but to what extent? See it's like this, we all have our own moral compass. No two people's are the same, so therefore, sometimes things may be more accurate then we think. Rosa Parks sat in the front seat of a white mans section, her moral compass told her she was a human being with pride. We get questioned everyday about what's OK ad not, but we are the dictators of our own life. Does peaceful resistance of laws positively or negatively impact a free society? I believe that
Today I look at the world and realize, what would have happened if we didn't rebel and stand up for our freedom? 2016 there has been very strict telling that, if we rebel, we get locked away for it. I would say that, nothing great has ever happened to this country, without some one being there to take a stand for it. The constitution, never would have happened our founding fathers hadn't taken a stand for our basic civil rights. If the colonies of America never wanted independence, then congress wouldn't have had John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and Benjamin Franklin conspire to make the Declaration of