The 2001 film directed by Ridley Scott was applauded for his recall on the horrific events that occurred in Somalia, …show more content…
1993. Throughout the film Scott portrays Americans as being the heroes, protecting those who were in danger of death and destruction. Scott shows the Americans as the sort of people that are ready to put up a fight in order to get things done. Commander Garrison is presented as being in charge by the high tech military equipment that surrounds him in his safe cove back at base. It is also shown by his uniform and direction of orders. Scott shows him and his fellow comrades as having the situation under control during the attack, unfortunately this was not the case. This was evident when his soldiers got brutally attacked unknowingly in the field of line. Amongst all this controversy he could not make up a decision and left it up to one of the Commanders in the field. The main message that is trying to be put across to the audience is that if you put faith into an American soldier they will succeed in the mission by taking down enemy line. Demonising the enemy is a propaganda technique that aims at evoking a very negative emotion by associating the “enemy” or opposing a ground as evil (Propaganda Theory, 2013). This technique was used in the opening scenes of the drama where Somalian soldiers were protecting a truck full of food aid. They were standing in a turret with machine guns and one of the soldiers was shown speaking into the megaphone ordering the civilians to back away from the truck. The civilians were being starved for weeks so in an attempt to survive they all charged at the truck and started hustling the bags of food. The soldiers ordered them to step away from the truck but they didn’t so they opened fire on the civilians, spraying them with bullets. This is a clear example of demonising the enemy as Scott shows the enemy shotting innocent people.
It is also important to note that within this scene the Americans are circling around the field in a black hawk and it shows them wanting to shoot down the enemy for their actions but are unable due to UN jurisdiction. This is a technique called Bandwagon, which persuades the audience to join in and take the course of action (Propaganda techniques, 2007). This event from the start of the film helps convince the audience that they are there to help protect the innocent victims. Another scene when this technique was used in the movie, was when a commander ordered his soldiers that none of them was to shoot unless being shot at. This ultimately gives the audience the perception that the Americans are once again the victims in the situation.
In most Western movies America are presented with high tech guns, armour and military equipment. A pure example of this is in one of the scenes where the Rangers are getting ready to go out into the battle. This shows the dominance in which they hold amongst the foreign land. No matter where they are they can still with hold power and destroy the enemy. Amongst the western culture to have America as an allies you pretty much have guaranteed protection if anything was to happen to your country.
Later on in the movie when a Black Hawk gets targeted by a grenade launcher the director makes the shot more real life. This makes the audience angrier and wants the Americans to destroy the enemy even more. Cinema verite is a technique that Scott used very successfully in this scene. This technique is a style of portraying a drama film into making it look like a real life documentary event (Filming Technique, 2009). It can bring out emotion in the viewer to feel of why they died for their country and that was to make earth a better place.
The audience that this feature film targets can be arguably for those who are patriotic Americans.
This type of demographic can be defined as the type of people who are in favour for the military’s decisions in certain circumstances all over the world. This made the film very successful because it made the Americans believe that they had every right to be in Somalia. This audience are also to be believed supportive of the killings during this horrific event. “Considerations of public opinion influenced Bill Clinton’s decision on going into Somalia in 1993. Ninety-seven per cent of the American public agreed that Clinton made the right decision” (Publics opinion on use of force, …show more content…
2004).
This film also played a major role for those who are allied with America. All the time the public are persuaded that American has a purpose within their military quarters. This may be going into another country and trying the resolve an issue amongst their own people. Countries like Australia and England both have a joint agreement that if America goes to war we are obliged to go with them. This tie between Australia and America is called the ANZUS treaty. The agreement between America and the UK is very much the same. When major countries like the ones mentioned join together it is a huge threat to the smaller minority in the world. This film utilises a propaganda technique called Euphoria, which draws on significant events to persuade the audience that what they did was right. This was shown mainly to the western world in which America has ties with.
Looking at this film and critiquing it you are able to see the way in which it romanticises the idea of war. In many cases it glorifies the idea of joining the army and ultimately invites a lot of the younger generation to enlist. The reason this being is because they see the Rangers that are in the movie and they are presented with courage, bravery and heroism. A lot of young kids see this and dream of one day protecting their country and ultimately becoming a stereotypical hero. “Television for children is the medium with the greatest socialisation effect, surpassing all the other media by far in its influence on a young child” (A Media’s Influence, 2013). No matter where a child is, he or she will always be influenced by propaganda techniques.
Towards the end of the film it shows the Americans fighting along side the UN forces. The United Nations are known as peacekeepers and are always in the middle of the argument. They never tend to take sides in a debate unless a group or party is proven guilty. In this instance you have the Somalian rebels shooting and attacking the Americans quite viscously. The UN is willingly helping the Americans to get out of the situation that they were in. In other words the UN is also being portrayed as being the good people. They will only help the innocent party, so from the audience’s point of view it puts the Americans in the good spot light.
Scott successfully uses propaganda techniques in the film Black Hawk Down to persuade the audience’s opinions on America’s involvement in Somalia, 1993. Scott utilises techniques such as stereotyping, euphoria, demonising the enemy and bandwagon. All of these persuasion methods were used quite clearly and effectively all the way through the drama. It is fair to say that even though it is labelled as a dramatic film it could also be considered quite highly as a propaganda film due to the unrealistic portrayal on certain events.
Bibliography –
Demonizing the Enemy.
(2013) [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.propagandatheory.com/types-of-propaganda/215/. [Last Accessed 02/11/2013].
Cinema vérité. (2008). [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cinema%20verité. [Last Accessed 31/10/2013].
Propaganda Techniques (2013). [ONLINE] Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda_techniques. [Last Accessed 1/11/2013].
Definition of Propaganda (2012). [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/propaganda. [Last Accessed 4/11/2013].
American Patriotism (2013). [ONLINE] Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_patriotism. [Last Accessed 3/11/2013].
Black Hawk Down, IMDb (2001). [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0265086/?ref_=ttco_co_tt. [Last Accessed 3/11/2013].
Media’s Influence, (2013). [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.education.com/reference/article/media-as-influence-socialization/. [Last Accessed 13/11/2013].
Public’s opinion on use of force, (2004). [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.hks.harvard.edu/fs/mbaum/documents/Somalia_PSQ.pdf. [Last Accessed
13/11/2013].