How Does The Constitution Guard Against Tyranny

Imagine the United States being lead by a power-hungry air head. The US 's current situation isn't very far off. Luckily, our Constitution prevents the situation of them being all power full. In the year of 1787, 55 delegates from the first states gathered together and created a document that gave birth to a thriving nation. Some had no idea what was to take place, but eventually, all decided the Articles of Confederation no longer were fit enough to help them prosper. Some may wonder how the Constitution accomplishes the task of guarding against tyranny. Tyranny is when a ruler or rulers have too much power. The Constitution implicates federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, and big states vs small states in order to guard against
This allows the power of making decisions to be split up between the central government and state governments. The central government deals with foreign affairs, the military, and our economy. The state government deals with things such as school, roads,and everyday affairs. Then, they come together and have jobs they both can do. In short, "the different governments will each control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself," (James Madison, Federalist Paper #51, 1788). Federalism protects against tyranny because it does not allow one government to have too much power. The central government and state government have enough power to make important decisions, yet not enough to have total control. They rule over each other while being able to rule over themselves. It's written in such a brilliant manner where everything is
They each need each other in order to complete certain tasks. In the constitution, it allows branches to do certain things to check each other. For example, the Legislative branch makes laws, but the president (Executive branch) can veto them. In return, the Legislative branch can impeach a president. The Executive branch appoints the supreme court judges, but the Legislative branch must approve. All three branches can check each other, which balances them. James Madison believes, "[The three branches] should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other," (James Madison, Federalist Paper #51, 1788). Checks and balances guards against tyranny because while separation of powers separates the three branches, checks and balances allows them to also be closely related. They are apart, yet they all affect each other. This stops the one branch from gathering too much