Preview

How effective is Parliament?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
497 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How effective is Parliament?
PM limited by European Constitution which defeats Parliamentary Sovereignty. Limited by scrutiny of Parliament (apparently).

Foley, political scientist since days of Margaret Thatcher, remarked on her presidential style, believed this had increased with Tony Blair. Reduction of cabinet meetings to half an hour per week, informal attitude to discussion (‘sofa’ politics), disregard for cabinet agenda (Millennium Dome – cabinet wanted it “fired into space”, Blair went along with it anyway), appealing over the heads of Cabinet and directly to the public (Terrorism Act) control of media (Alistair Campbell), presidential style (sound bites – ‘people’s princess’), relationship with Bush.

House of Lords intended to scrutinise work of government, has power to veto legislation for a maximum of two years. No longer any hereditary peers in House of Lords

Parliament fails to be entirely representative. First Past the Post System, e.g. Labour receives 55% of the seats but only %35 of the votes. Background of typical MPs, in 2001 out of 365 MPs, only 118 female. Only 12 MPs from ethnic minorities, representing 2% of the 5.5% of ethnic minorities which the population consists of. A third are privately educated, distinct lack of representation for the working classes.

Parliament can prove effective in right circumstances, but overall fails to be so. “Elected Dictatorship”. Standing Committees- assess and suggest amendments to bills (e.g. new Education Bill). Relevant minister for topic required to be present along with spokesperson for the opposition. Sounds effective, not so much so in practice. Heavily influenced by whips. Only pass amendments which come from the government. Not allowed to call outside witnesses so may not even understand what they’re voting on. If a case takes too long, it is ‘guillotined’, thrown out. Select Committees – assigned to scrutinise work of individual departments. Any members of committee prove troublesome to government they can be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Tim Schouls in his essay, “Why Group Representation in Parliament Is Important,” argues that the parliamentary representation in Canada is unfair because it doesn’t represent Canada’s social diversity as a whole. He believes that democracy in Canada can be considerably deepened and enhanced when the composition of the House of Commons substantially reflects the social diversity of Canada (for example, Aboriginals, ethnic minorities, visible minorities, gays etc.) instead of geographical diversity (constituencies). He asserts there’s a big change taking place in Canadian politics; attachment to geography, language, and religion are becoming less important to Canadians while attachments to ethnicity and gender are becoming…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Power in theory in this system should lie with the commons and the chamber as they should be able to voice their opinions, and fight the policies of government properly but obviously parliamentary control does limit this a huge amount as how can this be true if a party does control power the opposition will be outnumbered and effectively be a lame duck and completely pointless. It means that parliament and the mps who are not inn government or the majority party have to literally sit there and can no longer really help their constituents on the issues that matter to them this certainly limits parliaments main function especially in opposition parties in particular. Secondly there is the argument that in politics and the majority party in particular there is a certain do as your told attitude, there is no more free thinking in parliament on a large scale anymore, mps are merely there to toe the party line as they cannot really step out of line as they may be deselected at the next election. This is a huge threat to there jobs basically but is very effective on behalf of the large party as it means that party whips will have to be used less, as most people in the party know that if they want to go far into the executive then they basically must…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are different ways that MPs hold the government to account; there are debates, select committees and questions, however there are many reasons in which these methods can be seen as ineffective. Accountability is forcing the government and it’s ministers to justify their policies, for opposition parties’ accountability may imply alternatives to the proposals of the government.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To What Extent is the House of Commons Effective in Carrying out Its Various Functions?…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Question One: The existence of the court hierarchy means that there are courts that are superior to other courts. One reason for this is if you are unhappy with a decision from a particular court you can appeal your case to a higher court. Another reason for the existence of the court hierarchy is the doctrine of precedent. This allows courts higher in the hierarchy to create a precedent that all lower courts must follow, making sure all cases are heard in a similar manner. Another reason for the existence of the court hierarchy is specialisation. This means the courts are able to specialise in their particular area of law.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legal Studies Notes

    • 37517 Words
    • 151 Pages

    A system of government where members of parliament are democratically elected to create laws that reflect the values and expectations of their constituent.…

    • 37517 Words
    • 151 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It can be argued that Prime ministers are almost omnipotent in the political system in the UK, this is due to the shear variety of powers in-which the prime minister holds, and the prerogatives that are taken advantage by the prime minister. However, checks on powers in the UK means that the prime minister is not as power as they appear, moreover, they are not separable from the UK political system, henceforth, they are controlled and limited within the system they are part of, thus, more often than not, prime ministers are less powerful then sometimes claimed.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The word parliament derives from a word loosely translated as ‘to talk’ or ‘to deliberate’. The UK Parliament consists officially of the two Houses of Parliament: the Lords and the Commons and the monarch, which by convention, delegates his or her authority to a group of ministers known as the executive. The role of parliament is mainly to legislate and to govern the United Kingdom through elected representatives. However the executive has a special role over the legislatures and it has been argued that the UK Parliament has become increasingly dominated by the executive.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly back bench MPs are a good way of promoting presentation in terms of their constituency boundary as they have been voted in by their electorate and so therefore should have a sound understanding of what the people need and want. However the majority of MPs are white males between their 40s and 50s. Out of 650 House of Common MPs, only 147 of them are female, which is disproportionate to the number of females in the UK. Also less than 25% of MPs are from a multicultural background so it cannot be 100% representative.…

    • 630 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parliament is designed to hold the executive accountable; therefore it goes about this by various means of government scrutiny, such as Prime Minister’s Question Time. In addition, Parliament is expected to perform a legislative function, creating the process of a bill becoming a law after undergoing many stages between the House of Commons and the House of Lords. Finally, Parliament is also required to be representative of the nation, with constituencies creating a strong local link between the electorate and their MP.…

    • 1529 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The pass bills, they debate and changes laws but to what extent is it effective.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are several important functions that Parliament must perform. The word Parliament derived from the Latin ‘parliamentum’ and the French word ‘parler’ which originally meant a talk- which is what Parliament does most of the time. Parliament consists of the House of Commons, the House of Lords and the Monarchy. Parliament is the highest judicial, legislative and executive body in Britain. A parliamentary form of government acknowledges that it derives its power directly from the consent of the people. This sort of system ensures democracy and an active interaction between the people and their representatives. The three functions that I am going to focus on are Scrutiny, Representation and Law Making.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The House of Commons can be seen to be effective in the cases where it has defied the government. Although this happens infrequently there have been cases where Commons has voted against government. A Good example of this is when Blair’s plans to extend the detention of terrorist suspects to 90 days were blocked.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although there is a president in a parliamentary democracy, the president is not in charge in the government, the prime…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parliamentary

    • 3593 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Parliamentarism is the most widely adopted system of government, and it seems appropriate to refer to British Parliamentary experience in particular because it is the British system which has provided an example for a great many other countries.Great Britain is regarded as mother country of the parliamentary executive. A parliamentary system, or parliamentarism,is distinguished by the head of government being dependent on the direct or indirect support of the parliament, often expressed through a vote of confidence. Hence, there is no clear cut separation of powers between the legislative and executive branches of government. Parliamentary systems usually have a clear differentiation between the head of government and the head of state.…

    • 3593 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays