Preview

How far do Sources 1 and 2 challenge the impression of the Charge of the Light Brigade given in Source 3?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
554 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How far do Sources 1 and 2 challenge the impression of the Charge of the Light Brigade given in Source 3?
How far do Sources 1 and 2 challenge the impression of the Charge of the Light Brigade given in Source 3?
The Charge of the Light Brigade was started by an order given by Lord Raglan to charge. It last half an hour and 113 men were killed. Source 3 is a ‘recalling’ of the brutality of the Charge of the Light Brigade. It shows the perspective of someone watching the battle rather than taking part so is therefore limited. Although, it is still useful as is written by a witness who saw it happen at the time of the event.
There are various features of source 1 and 2 that challenge source 3’s impression of the Charge of the Light Brigade. For example, source 1 portrays the appearance of only Russian soldiers and of the English look triumphant. Whereas source 3 states ‘our men tried to drag their mangled bodies’ giving the impression that many were badly injured. Source 2 challenges source 3 by saying ‘right thro’ the line they broke’ this gives the impression the English troops managed to get onto Russian ground and shows them as more successful than stated in source 3. In addition source 2 agrees with source 1 in this sense as can be seen in the picture, the English soldiers have reached the Russians and the Russians are made to look weak. Source 2 however is limited as is written as a poem, so may be dramatized to add effect and make to it more interesting to read. Also the information included in the poem was written on the Isle of Weight after hearing Russell’s report so is very limited.
Despite the various things that challenge source 3 in source 2 and 1 there are also many things that agree with it. When looking at the cartoon in source 1 it appears to disagree with source 3, however looking at the provenance may change this opinion. It was published in the magazine ‘Punch’ which was a teasing and dramatizing newspaper. It was also only one month after the Charge of the Light Brigade and everyone knew how badly the English had performed. It appears to pick fun

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Colonel Campbell’s men were the first to charge up the hill and engage the Rangers (Alderman 36). The mountain was rough, but still they took charge. Campbell’s shouted appeal was, “Boys remember your liberty, come on, do it my brave fellows, another gun, another gun will do it.” When Shelby’s men approached the bottom of the hill, he yelled, “Now boys, quickly reload your rifles and let’s advance upon them and give them another hell of a fire.” More and more troops continued to take down the British. “The human slaughter was tremendous. The dead and wounded covered the mountain on the slopes and on the flat” (Alderman 38). Ferguson soon realized that he had pretty much lost, but he did not surrender yet. He broke his way through enemy lines; slashing his sword at whoever was in his way. Ferguson and two fellow officers were shot down by the creek. “Most historians have credited Robert Young with the deed. Regardless, the bullet that felled Ferguson soon brought the battle to an end” (Alderman 38). Captain Abraham De Peyster took charge of the British force after Ferguson died. Captain De Peyster continued to fight on, but he hopelessly realized there was not much more he and his troops could do, so he surrendered. A near tragedy occurred soon after the British surrendered. Tories, followers of King George III, grabbed their guns and fired at the patriots. The aftermath was very confusing…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Source 4 is written by Captain Seager. The source is a primary source, a letter to his wife. Captain Seager had served under Lord Cardigan from the start of the war. He says in his letter that “if self-importance or bluster are necessary for command, then he is the man” referring to Lord Cardigan. He also says he gallantly went to the Russian guns, but left the brigade to get back the best it could. The source therefor infers that Lord Cardigan was an incompetent leader, Captain Seager did not like him and that Cardigan abandoned his men to their fate at the battle of Balaklava. This letter is reliable as its to his wife, a private letter not meant for the public, so it is the truth of events, It is still useful as it’s point of view from the soldier, although it was written 2 months after the charge.…

    • 273 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    While that blaze may represent the light of glory, Bierce uses word “monstrous” to express how the soldiers felt internally-…

    • 171 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Richard Palmes, he asked the Captain if he intended to fire to which he replied "by no means" (Wheeler and Becker, 86). Another witness, William Wyatt, who was also very close to the disturbance, alleged that the mob was yelling fire and Captain Preston did reprimand his men for firing without his orders (Wheeler and Becker, 83). James Woodall confirmed that a stick causing the soldier to instantaneously fire struck a soldier. He ascertained that the Captain did not give the order to fire (Wheeler and Becker, 88). Consistent with all the testimonies, Edward Hill observed the Captain ordering one of his soldiers to put away his gun stating that he "have done mischief enough" (Wheeler and Becker,…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Amritsar Massacre Dbq

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On April 13, 1919, in Amritsar, India, a great tragedy occurred that day. The massacre that killed at least 379 people and the wounding of at least 1,200 others was committed by the British general Reginald Dyer (Cavendish). Many protests and riots preceded the massacre and resulting from them were the arrests of two leaders by the British ("Amritsar Massacre"). This caused many Indians to form mobs, which looted businesses and killed five British people (Cavendish). General Dyer was sent to Amritsar to restore order in there ("Amritsar Massacre"). What happened after he got there is why you, the Jury, are all in court today to decide General Dyer’s fate.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compare how poets portray war in The Charge Of The Light Brigade and one other poem…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lexington Concord

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What does Lieutenant Gould testify as to who fired first at Lexington?he didn't know for sure.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The origin of the document is the official report of Major Pitcairn, commander of the advanced British party that first entered Lexington Green, to General Gage, his commander in Boston. The purpose of the document was to have a report of the event from a primary source. A value to this document is that the author is a primary source and actually at the event. Another value would be that he was very specific in the recollection of the events. A limitation to this document is that the author is British and reporting to his commander meaning that he could have a lot to lose if he did something wrong, so the chances that he left something out is greater. Another limitation is that he is clearly putting emphasis when he repeatedly states that he did not give orders to fire. This shows that he might be trying to persuade you that he did nothing wrong.…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ap Boston Massacre Trials

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After this whole case, and a lot of thought, I find each of the eight British soldiers guilty of voluntary manslaughter. They were not found guilty of murder because they were provoked, but not to the point where they killed anybody under self-defense, which would deem them as not guilty. They are found guilty for manslaughter because they were being threatened, but not to the point where their lives were in any danger. In the trial, John Adams specifically stated " Adams conceded, however, that if the assault "was not so severe as to endanger their lives ,this was a provocation, for which the law reduces the offense of killing down to manslaughter." This supports my verdict as voluntary manslaughter, they should be punished according to the punishment.…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    All he had to build off were his interrogations with a little over 100 men out of the 500 in the Battalion. (214) I think that this discredits his assumptions slightly, but Browning still makes a great argument. To find what the intentions were of the Battalion, you cannot simply ask one man from the group, because everyone is different and has contrasting views. While these men grew up in a time of racism and anti-Semitic propaganda, if one man answers that he was raised with a hatred of Jews, and he went out eager to kill, it is wrong to assume that every member of the Battalion had the same outlook. Browning noted that around 10 percent of the Battalion refused to shoot, for logical reasoning, and many shot due to other psychological reasons. (215) For the men that did do the shooting, it was not easy at first, but they became desensitized seeing the horrors every day. The killing became a routine activity for them, as bad as that sounds, it became increasingly easier. (215) For many of the group, the orders from their superiors were what made them pull the trigger. They did not want to be viewed as a coward, they wanted to move up in their ranks and fight for their country. It was easier for these men to shoot than to turn their backs on their leaders and comrades. If you were to step out of your ranks, the men would face…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charge at the Nek

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The film Gallipoli provides an inaccurate interpretation of the charge at the Nek on the 15th of August 1915. Firstly, the film slightly…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In document C, the picture shows that the British soldiers were shooting at unarmed colonists. The image showed that the colonists were harmed by the British soldiers. This action from the British soldiers only got the colonists more angry. In document F, the image shows that the colonists tarred and feathered a British loyalist. These colonists were tarring and feathering the loyalist because they were mad at the British soldiers for shooting at the unarmed colonists.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    We have been studying the war poems Dulce Et Decorum Est by Wilfred Owen and Charge Of The Light Brigade by Alfred Lord Tennyson. Dulce Et Decorum Est was written during the First World War from 1914 to 1918 whilst Charge Of The Light Brigade was composed in the 19th century, and describes a battle that took place during the Crimean War.…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tennyson's Charge of The Light Brigade and Owen's Dulce Et Decorum Est both explore warfare. However they each have significant differences. Charge Of The Light Brigade was written in the 18th Century and is about the Crimean War. It explains, in a very majestic manner, that fighting in a war is something every soldier should be extremely proud of. Sacrifices have to be made and bravery is an absolute necessity. Tennyson ignores the darkness and slaughter of war by emphasising the courage and loyalty that the soldiers have for their country. They do not show fear, even when they are attacked with weapons much greater and deadlier than their own. Dulce Et Decorum Est was written in the 20th Century. It depicts war, in this case WW1, an exact opposite to Charge Of The Light Brigade. Owen wants to dispel the lie that describes war as a place of pride and brightness, when in reality it is a place of bloodshed and obscurity. Owen knows first hand the devastation of combatting in war because he experienced it himself; therefore he ridicules the renowned title ‘Dulce Et Decorum Est', which means ‘it is sweet and fitting' by recounting the horrifying scenes that he has unfortunately witnessed, and consequently leads his poem to a clever conclusion involving the Latin phrase.…

    • 2305 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    War is a subject that often stirs upon many emotions with those directly or indirectly involved. It may bring tears, memories of suffering and loneliness, struggles, or victories. Such disturbance of peace has wounded and killed many souls. It is on the battlefield we see the most hideous side of human nature, for every soldier's only objective on the battlefield is to survive and win. Many people have opposing views about wars which may have been developed over time based on many factors such as family upbringing, culture, political views, or personal experiences. In the two poems studied, Wilfred Owen's "Dulce et Decorum est" and Alfred, Lord Tennyson's "The Charge of the Light Brigade", war has been described with completely opposing views. In the former, Owen describes war as a horrifying and inglorious event with men in war being grim and sorrowful while the soldiers died devastatingly. On the other hand, Tennyson describes war as being a glorious and victorious event where it is an absolute honour for a soldier to die on the gallant battlefield.…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays