-Tzar government was significantly weakened by FWW-
Before 1914, Russian society was very unhappy with the Tzar government. Surprisingly, Russia participation in the war woke up Russian people patriotism and people disagreement on Tzar´s government remained in the background, almost forgotten. This was the first time in many years that Russian citizens were proud to be Russian, in fact, they were willing to fight for their country. Terrorist strikes against Nicholas ceased in order to show support in their new national cause: War.
The German army overpowered a Russian army, whose high point was having a lot of soldiers but on the other hand having lack of resources (ammo, weapons) and no proper leadership. After some more looses, Nicholas took a shot on leading himself the Russian army yet he had no experience on commanding. This made no difference to the war but giving people another reason to blame Nicholas, responsible for Russia´s misery, and enhance people idea of taking down his government. Even the army, in 1917, started supporting this idea.
These events triggered a reaction in the Russian population. Sectors that supported Tsar government sided against him for the first time. Tension once again was settled in Russia and revolutionary movements reappeared.
-FWW event didn´t mean a significant weaken to the Tzar government-
Nicholas II became a Tzar in 1894, with the majority of Russians living in poverty with no possibility of improving their condition.
The main supporter of the Tzar’s monarchy was the Orthodox Church (Rich and powerful), which gave Tzar a “Divine approval”. Tzar was respected and recognized as an authority for the Russians. Apart from them, only high classes supported the Tzar. Peasants, workers and the middle class were exploited (industry workers had to work almost 20 hours a day) and very discontent.
At that time, social movements against the Tzarist regimen were starting to become popular. However, the Tzar lost the population respect definitely during the crucial event of 1905 known as the Bloody Sunday, where the Tzar defense corpse (Kossaks) opened fire on a pacific social protest that were just asking for human rights.
Also, Russian army was humiliated by the Japanese in the Japanese-Russian war (1904-1905), being easily defeated and showing the world they weren´t as powerful as they seemed.
Both Japanese-Russian war humiliation and Bloody Sunday factors combined, turned things around. From now on, Russian people will blame the Tzar for the Russian misery and finally, trigger the 1905 revolution. The Tzar Government was weaker than ever.
The nation was in real tension and Nicholas was the main cause. In order to appease Russian people, he came up with the October Manifesto, promising to grant personal liberties and the creation of a parliament. The Manifesto was enough to chill the Russians and hope for change. None of this promises were intended to become true and in fact, they didn´t.
-Conclusion-
After analyzing both answers, Russia entering the First World War had a major impact on Tzar Government weakening process. First World War was Tzarist regimen death sentence and the most powerful reason to blame the Tzar for Russian misery. In brief words, Bloody Sunday and Japanese-Russian war set the stage, First World War, proved to be the tipping point.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
After the riots of 1917, the Tsarist regime collapsed, and many would argue that it was mainly as a result of the First World War beginning in 1914.…
- 1166 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
While this was happening, World War 1 was not going well for Nicholas, who had still not won a large battle which he could tell the people about. This meant that most of the Russian moral had gone and the war effort had lost all of its momentum first gained. Also the severe winter did not help, it meant that there was a shortage of food for all classes of people, and the means of transport were disabled.…
- 735 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Tsar Nicholas II’s lack of military experience and inability to rule the throne all together, additionally contributed to the devastating outcome of WW1 on Russia. “A quick intelligence, a cultivated mind, method and industry in his work, an extraordinary charm that attracted all who came near him- the Emperor Nicholas had not inherited his father’s commanding personality nor the strong character and prompt decision which are so essential to an autocratic ruler...” stated Sir G. Buchanan, British ambassador to Russia in 1910, emphasizes how the urban lower classes were not the only ones unsatisfied with the Tsar Nicholas…
- 875 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Russia was still an autocracy, this meant that the Tsar had complete power and his rules and beliefs could not be challenged. The autocracy system was growing old, people in Russia wanted westernization and democracy, however Nicholas II opposed these beliefs. After the events of…
- 1510 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
Which of the previous Tsars were most to blame for the problems inherited by Nicholas II when he ascended to the throne in 1894?…
- 958 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Nicholas II started a very unnecessary war with Japan which was a huge mistake that he made. The Tsar made plans to seize control of Constantinople and expanded into Manchuria and Korea. Japan did not like this. As he did this Japan felt threatened by his action and on February 8th, 1904 the Japanese navy surprised attacked on the Russian fleet at Port Arthur. As this point the Russian army was not in a very good place to be. Also, when World War 1 started the the Russian army was not properly supplied. By December 1914 the Russian army had 6,553,000 troops; however they only had 4,652,000 rifles. Untrained troops were forced into battle without rifles and ammunition. According to spartacus-educational.com, the army had about one surgeon every 10,000 men. Many soldiers would die from wounds that could be treated, but there was nobody to treat them. These men were sitting ducks waiting for a fellow soldier to fall just to pick up their gun to…
- 816 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Many Russians were infuriated by the government because the Tsar did not take action when the country was deteriorating. In addition, he failed to carry his people during the war. With this catastrophe, the Russians demanded for their voices to be heard and for a change in the government and as a result, war occurred within the country. Selfish people, like Nicholas II who kept all the power to himself, often affect others deeply, or foster terrible consequences. For example, one may take all the credit for working on a group project. Other group members will feel injustice and demand for credit to be given to them since they worked as hard as all the others did. Likewise, the Tsar’s decision to maintain power led to citizens rioting and the fall of his power. People should always think about their actions before executing them, or else the aftermath would be…
- 1209 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The sudden outbreak of World War One was a great reflection of Nicholas II and his inefficiency commanding Russia. Before the war even began, hundreds…
- 2229 Words
- 9 Pages
Best Essays -
Russian Revolution and Tsar Nicholas II The Russian Revolution, a 20th century period of political and social change, had many factors, the most impactful being Tsar Nicholas II’s incompetence. His self-centered goals and struggles to meet the people's needs caused uprisings throughout Russia. We see Tsar Nicholas II’s incompetence in his overall management ability, how he reacted to Bloody Sunday, and his delegation of power to his wife. When Nicholas II became Tsar in 1896 following his father's death, Russia was already behind in the world of industrialization.…
- 639 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
There were massive socio-economic changes taking place . This created a new class of factory workers . The working class , mostly the peasants - who comprised of 84% of the Russian population - were moved to the city to work in factories . Little could have been done about this as products had to be manufactured in the country , as trade routes were cut off due to WWI . On one hand , due to Tsar Nicholas II autocratic policies, there were no trade unions,to look out workers rights. For that reason living and working conditions were very bad . Workers worked for 14 hours a day and slept in overcrowded lodging houses , as illustrated by Father Gapon in 1905. On the other hand if the workers were treated better , they wouldn't have been so quick to go against the Tsar . His epathy further allienated his…
- 789 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Russ-Japanese was the beginning of the on going failure of Czar Nicholas II. The war began over both Japan and Russia wanting control over Manchuria, Russia was defeated and shaken. The Czars people began lose their faith as it started the many strikes and demonstrations in St. Petersburg. Starting a war was Nicholas’s plan to divert the attention from the national problems of Russia, however created the original division between the Czar and his people. The war was fought in the far eastern reaches of Russia and most of the population lived in Moscow and St. Petersburg, so talk of the war created little enthusiasm for people to fell about the war, which Nicholas was hoping for.…
- 597 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In the Revolution of 1905, Russians gained new political freedom. However, Russia was still plagued with problems. The famine from previous years still raged on. In 1914, Russia joined World War I. To pay for the war, Russia raised taxes, secured foreign loans, and printed more money. This combined with many other factors, left the people of Russia wanting change. They needed the government to change, the famine to end, and economic stability.…
- 715 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
By 1917, Russia was chaotic, the government had been thoroughly corrupted, strikes were rampant and all happening at once. The World War I had begun and Russia was having many casualties due to being ill - equipped against industrialized Germany, and amidst the countries it was the one to receive most damage. Due to the german attacks the Russian economy had been falling apart, and such a situation was only useful to the radicals, as they used it as an opportunity to join with the moderates among other forces, in order to overthrow the Czar and achieve their revolutionary goals. As time passed Russia’s situation only deteriorated, demonstrators and protestants took over the streets, the king’s armies killed many of them, but they still continued to attack full force. Then when an army took the protestants side, the tables flipped, Nicholas II, the Czar at the time was forced to abdicate his throne and so freed Russia of over four centuries of Czarist…
- 687 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
When discussing why public opinion of the tsar was so easily pliable in the lead up to revolution in 1917, we must acknowledge that Russia was evolving rapidly. As modern historians and public spectators, it is simple to map out how Russian society became a pressure cooker of discontent and anger. Mass industrialisation made living for a working, urban class almost unbearable, the class divide was still rigid, revolutionary ideas from the West offered a foundation to base claims for the removal of the autocratic system, and the pressures of World War 1 served to unite the people in one cause to end hardship. These factors stoked a population already vying for change and such an environment made revolution in Petrograd (St Petersburg) in the February of 1917 almost inevitable, foreshadowing the end of the…
- 1502 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
The serfs were "freed", the provisional government failed and the czar made serious mistakes. The serfs were "freed" then again got tooken over by the Communist party and were told what to do, where to live, and where to work. The provisional government failed fatefully by continuing war against Germany and got defeated. The czar, well he made a couple of serious mistakes. He fought in the Russo-Japanese War and got defeated. Then he went to war with Austria and Germany and got defeated. The last mistake he made was moving the headquarters to the front and leaving the Russian government under the Alexandra's hands. Conditions were desperate under her rule. The Russian Revolution should have never happened because so many Russian lives were lost under the Russian…
- 942 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays