Preview

How Important Was The Privy Council

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
743 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Important Was The Privy Council
How important was the Privy Council
It could be argued that the monarch was an important member of government however some may disagree and put forward the idea that the Privy Council was more important. This is for several reasons the first reason (for the monarch) was the fact that she could decide who could become a member of the Privy Council this is because it meant that she had total power over those who that would help run the country. However this did not mean that the monarch was the most important figure as it could be argued that the monarch did in fact have a ‘Back Seat’ with regards to running the country as historians could argue that it was the privy council, as opposed to the queen, that did the main portion of running the country as was with William Cecil who was worked (quite literally) up until his death. Elizabeth even fed him broth on his death bed further highlighting his importance in the running of the country and his importance to Elizabeth.
The Privy Council was responsible for the general administration of the country. Who was on the Council depended on Elizabeth, but as some of the nobles of her realm had a lot of power, Elizabeth had to make sure that the most powerful men in her country had their interests represented. One of these powerful men was William Cecil whom of which was regarded as one of the best at his job at the time. Yet his success in his job of running the country, it could not last forever. Therefore Williams’s son had to take his place – his name was Robert Cecil. Others argued that this was a main reason for the monarch being more important as once the first generation of ministers had died then their sons usually took their place and it quickly became apparent that they were not in fact as good as their predecessors either due to lack of experience or just a lack of skill, none the less Robert did not stand up to the job nearly as well as someone such as William Cecil. Therefore the Queen had to work just that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Before he died, Edward IV wrote out a set of instructions for what he wanted to happen in the event of his death. The first he wrote stated that there would be a council consisting of several people, to advise Edward V and govern for him until he was old enough to perform of his own accord. It was made clear that Elizabeth Woodville would sit on this council and be in a position with a lot of power. However, before he died Edward IV made amendments to this. The exact document was never recovered and so it is unclear as to what exactly it said, but it is agreed…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    William Cecil’s influence touched on just about all aspects of policy that occurred during Elizabeth’s long reign. In the Royal Court he brought order and stability. Cecil was also highly influential in foreign policy. He saw France and Spain as threats to. It has also been argued that Cecil was not just the provider of advice and executor of the Queens wishes but also that he could have been the power behind the throne. Plenty of evidence has come to light that suggests that the Secretary regularly attempted to manipulate Elizabeth however it would be inaccurate to assume that all of Cecil’s personal agendas were fruitful, Elizabeth could make her own mind up and often did so. Although Cecil was a prominent figure during this time, Elizabeth was still the person who ruled the country and had her own ideas on how to run the country. Elizabeth was firmly in control of major policies and on many occasions obstinately ignored the Councils advice. The Council conscientiously carried out the Queens wishes even when it had advised otherwise. There is general agreement that, until its decline in the 1590s central government under Elizabeth was successful and that the Queen provided firm direction. According to Neale Parliament was another aspect that had influence over decision making in Elizabeth government He argues that the power of the House of Commons increased throughout Elizabeth’s reign. The number of conflicts Elizabeth had with individual MPs and the problems which the Stuarts experienced with Parliament are evidence for this. These developments were brought by the “Puritan Choir “who deliberately planned confrontations to force the issue of parliamentary privilege versus the royal prerogative. It is therefore necessary to investigate not only to what extent Cecil was involved in the decision making process but also the influence of the Parliament on Elizabeth and ultimately the decisions that were taken through this time of how many were Elizabeth’s own ideas.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Charles’s led the country without calling parliament for 11 years from 1629 – 1640. He initiated personal rule for many reasons. Firstly his close relationship with Buckingham alienated Parliament and caused resentment by Parliament. Secondly Charles had very strong believed in divine right and therefore saw no need for Parliament. Furthermore Charles religious policy’s led many to believe of a Catholic Conspiracy, which further distanced the King from Parliament. Lastly the King wasn’t getting substantial financial help from Parliament and decided that he would try and raise the finance without him.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Charles 1 A Crisis

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A move that created further division between the court and the country, as the infamous figure that could make structural changes in the country, due to his relations with the King. A consequence that demonstrates narcissistic behaviour to ensure that he succeeds with his agenda. It is arguably thought that his agenda was to have full control over England and Scotland. Charles–more so than his father–acted on the “evil” advice of George and dismissed members of court. For example, “Lord Keeper Williams, who James protected”, a ‘known enemy of George’, dismissed by Charles as George was able to convince him to do so.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One reason being the fact that monarchs are more worried about the benefit of their county. A president for example, may have conflict of interest, whereas a monarch most likely will not. Furthermore, with a democratic republic, issues must go through a process which cannot be quickly achieved. A king or queen however, can make decisions and put them into effect with minor delay, if any. Another benefit of monarchy is they will not become corrupt because they have not made a commitment to any groups that needs to be fulfilled. They are above the influence of any political…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One factor Elizabeth had to face, which was seen as a huge disadvantage, was her gender. This was because the society was very patriarchal, male dominated, meaning that she was seen as week and less capable of being a good leader. This was a problem for Elizabeth as she had to do more to prove that she could be a good leader. This leads onto the fact that her sister Mary wasn’t a good leader so therefore there were low expectations of Elizabeth, This also meant Elizabeth had a lot to prove in order to be a good leader. Although this was a problem for Elizabeth, there were also positive factors to her gender. One of these was that Elizabeth was very good at using her flirtatious charm to get what she wanted. Another reason Elizabeth’s gender wasn’t too much of a problem was that she asserted her royal authority; it was her divine right to become the queen as god had chosen her.…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Elizabeth I is a one of the main known rulers of England. She brought in the “Golden Age” of Britannia. Many books that are written about Elizabeth chronologically tell about her decisions and how they affect England and the rest of Europe. Most of the books are biographies but, Christopher Haigh’s book Elizabeth I is not merely a biography but a detailed account on how Elizabeth and the people around her influenced each other and how that affected Elizabeth’s reign. In Christopher Haigh’s book Elizabeth I: Profiles in Power, his main argument and thesis is that Elizabeth had to play a dangerous game throughout her life and rule to keep England balanced with illusion.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The role of Prime Minister has been constantly evolving over the years, and it can be argued that the degree of power he/she wields changes with it. For example, during the late 17th century, a Chief Minister existed as a special advisor to the monarch. However by the late 19th century, the Prime Minister is the leader of the largest party of House of Commons and enjoys greater political power, whereas the monarch acts as Head of State.…

    • 664 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first major internal problem faced by Elizabeth at the start of her reign was her gender. The idea of a female monarch met hostility in Tudor England and Elizabeth was faced with criticism by the Protestant preacher John Knox who wrote ‘to promote a woman to bear rule, superiority, dominion, or empire above any realm, nation or city is repugnant by nature and a insult to God.’ However Elizabeth overcame the issue of her gender in her appointment of administrators and management of political matters. Immediately after coming to the throne, Elizabeth successfully established her royal and political authority by appointing William Cecil as her principle secretary, a successful partnership in government which lasted 40 years. Elizabeth then appointed Thomas Parry as controller of the household and Robert Dudley as Master of the Horse. The appointment of her friends and supporters highlight that Elizabeth overcame her internal problem of her gender as Elizabeth had successfully established her authority, despite being a female queen she was supported…

    • 2462 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Gov't

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The hereditary monarch, who must belong to the Church of England according to the Act of Settlement of 1701, is almost entirely limited to exercising ceremonial functions as the head of state.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socials 10 notes

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages

    2. Crown has ultimate power, beyond that held by any particular government at any particular time, it is vested in the queen, and in governor general as her representative. For example, if prime minister were to decide not to call an election within five years as required by law, governor general could order…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Did the Civil War Begin?

    • 2630 Words
    • 11 Pages

    On 22 August 1642, King Charles I raised his battle standard and declared a civil war against his enemies in Parliament.…

    • 2630 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The King also greatly affected their legislative powers. He wouldn't let people be elected, he caused innocent people to be convicted of crimes that they didn't commit, and he even made it so laws couldn’t be passed without his consent, but when the time would come for the law to be passed, the King wouldn’t show up. He would also call the legislative bodies together when he knew that the officers couldn't show up without difficulty.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Canadian Monarchy

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It provides legal foundations for the structure of government an ministerial accountability. It also protects rule of law and rights and freedoms, as it was based on that principle. That is what democracy is, so the Crown protecting that crucial part of democracy makes it stronger rather than undermining it. Historically, the Crown celebrates British heritage which implemented parliamentary democracy in the first place. It also represents the common interests of the people which is another key feature in any democracy. The crown affects everything in one’s day-to-day life from how people are employed, to property holding, to court cases, all of this is…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    played a big rule in the whole army thing because they thought I have already raised taxes so I can do anything and it will happen without a doubt.people that were in the Monarchy believed in the divine rights…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays