Born unto a tyrant father, Alexander had the reputation of a cruel ruler who slaughtered people and destroyed cities. The first example of this would be his plight with the Thebans. When Alexander became ruler, he had garnered a mass amount of support from his own Greek jurisdiction and the surrounding areas except the city-state of Thebes. They saw him as they saw his father, a ruthless tyrant. After a short time, they began to revolt. When the Thebans became hostile, Alexander gave them one final opportunity to surrender and join his troops. In response to this, the Thebans returned the offer to Alexander’s troops. Alexander’s army came to deal with this and eventually destroyed the …show more content…
This city was named Alexandria, and contrary to popular belief, Alexander had nothing to do with it in his lifetime. He put his name on it, hired people to build it (probably including the Persian slaves), and left it at that. Alexandria became a thriving city over the course of history and the only thing that Alexander can claim about it was that his name is on it. He was eventually buried there after he died of what some believe was a disease, others believe he was killed. Although named after him, Alexandria’s foundation and evolution all happened without the help of Alexander.
In conclusion, most people believe that Alexander the Great was actually great. Until people read more into his travels and deeds, they’ll believe that. After researching him, you’ll see that Alexander the Great wasn’t so great after