Preview

How Is the Liberal Electoral Victory of 1906 Best Explained?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1468 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Is the Liberal Electoral Victory of 1906 Best Explained?
The liberal’s victory in the 1906 was a very significant one due to how they won it with such an overwhelming majority; it was the biggest electoral victory since 1832. In the 1890’s the liberals were suffering from a crisis identity and they were lacking in money and morale. In the 1906 election the liberals won 49.4% of the vote and that amounted to 399 seats which was such a large margin compared to in 1900 where 45% of the vote was only 183 seats. There are four main reasons arguably why the Liberals won the1906 election and these are through Conservative faults such as the massacre in the Boer war. The education act in 1902 and Chamberlain’s tariff reform campaign also lost the conservatives a lot of support, which meant people turned to liberals just due to disliking the conservatives. The most important reason was Arthur Balfour getting involved and not making the right decisions for the conservatives and losing a lot of the voters they had before. The liberals also used a very negative campaign in order to get voters to realise the flaws in the conservative’s ideals and make them vote for the liberals just through dislike of the other parties.
The most important factor in the liberal victory in the 1902 election was the involvement of Balfour and miscalculations whilst running the conservatives as Prime Minister. Balfour was not the only cause but was the main reason for the turnaround in electoral fortunes. Salisbury had the conservative party well under control and there were no signs of a turnaround; when Balfour took over everything changed. It is argued that if Arthur Balfour never took over then the electoral turnaround would never of happened. The first major mistake by Balfour was the 1902 education act, Salisbury knew the dangers of the act but Balfour nevertheless carried on with the education bill. The bill was so unpopular with the non-conformist Liberals and due to Balfour supporting the act and having been the one to get the act through

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The government could not fumction without money so the issue was put to the voters to decide. The Conservatives had to win a large number of seats in order to justify their rejection of the budget, however they did not and ithe election was therefore a defeat for the Conservatives. However, the Liberals no longer had an overall majority in the commons so they could only get their bills passed if they got the support of the Labour party and Irish Nationalists. The Irish Nationalists would only give their support in return for granting of Home Rule for Ireland, so the Liberal party had to include Home Rule in their policy. The Liberals were reliant on the Labour Party as Labour would only support them in return for favourable legislation for trade unions, assistance for working class candidates to become MPs. This allowed the Labour Party to develop links with uniona and allowed them to field more candidates at future elections, enabling them to challenge the Liberal Party; weakening the Liberals. After the election the budget was re-introduced into parliament and was passed by both…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There were, during the 1950 's and 1960 's three main political parties in Australia. They were: The Australian Labor Party (ALP). A mildly left-of-centre, socialist party, the ALP was conceived, like its British and New Zealand counterparts to represent the rights of the workers against those of the employers. It held power during the years 1941-1949, being defeated after a series of disastrous Communist led coal strikes which had crippled the economy and because of fears within the electorate that its plan to nationalise the banks in 1949 meant that it was moving too far to the left. The Liberal Party. A mildly, right-of-centre, conservative party, the Liberals (a misnaming if ever there was one in my opinion), were created out of the remains of the United Australia Party, which had dissolved as a consequence of losing government in 1941 as the result of a no-confidence motion in the then Prime Minister, R.G. Menzies. Menzies had then been re-elected in 1949 after skillfully making use of the electorate 's fears of Communism. This "kicking the Communist can" as it became known was an electoral tactic which the Liberals used time and time again successfully as a means of keeping the ALP in Opposition. The Country Party. A party which was and still is basically a mix of elements of both left and right and designed to represent the interests of the country dwellers and farmers of Australia.…

    • 7337 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To what extent was Whig/Liberal dominance in the period 1846-68 a result of their free trade agenda?…

    • 2523 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (CCF) was the winner of the 1935 federal election, but what made the voters choose them over the other parties in the election? To begin, the leader of the party J.S. Woodsworth, was able to persuade voters with motivational speeches, respond to voter questions with confidence, and the party platform was also well written and balanced. To begin, a contributing factor to the success of the CCF were the motivational and persuasive speeches by the leader of the party, J.S. Woodsworth. He appealed to the entire audience and his party was in the center of attention. Additionally, the CCF were able to respond proficiently to questions posed by the voters with detail and clarity which led to voter confidence.…

    • 242 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This was the first time the Liberals were reunited since the Boer war. This aided them in an attempt to reunite there votes aswell. This meant that they were the second biggest party after the conservatives. All they needed to do was show the weaknesses of Balfour. The final nail in the coffin was having a decisive manifesto over free trede and how they refused to do it in case it harmed the working class. It was most important to appease the working class because they were the majority of the vote but they were also the poorest people able to vote with decisiveness.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, the Liberal party were not dedicated to women’s suffrage and time after time, women were led to believe that votes for women were achievable, only to be let down and humiliated. This can be seen in the response to various reform bills. Before 1906, none of the bills for the enfranchisement of the women were introduced by the government but by individual members. Indeed, all these bills failed during this period due to a lack of government support and refusal for parliamentary time to debate this issue. For example the government refused to support an amendment to a Plural Voting Bill in 1906 which would have enfranchised a number of propertied women. Moreover, in 1910 when the First Conciliation Bill passed its second reading it failed because the government failed to grant it parliamentary time and in 1911 when the Second Conciliation Bill passed its second reading Asquith announced that he preferred to support manhood suffrage. These failures and lack of government support for the Conciliation Bills suggest that the Liberal Party may not have had any real interest in women’s suffrage as they failed to…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the 1935 election the Liberals campaigned by saying that Conservatives had stolen most of their new reforms from the Liberals, who were better able to operate them. The depression gave King his greatest Parliamentary majority up to that time, 171 seats out of 245.…

    • 3163 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A watershed Election is one that changes history. The candidate has a campaign that decides the course of politics for decades; one that is especially memorable, or that proves to be a dividing line between historical periods. The election of 1896 was just that.…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The presidential election of 1828 can be described as a “Democratic Revolution” because of the contrasts between itself and the previous election of 1824. Firstly, the graph from Thursday’s class shows us a giant increase in percentage of voters from 1824-28 (1). When compared to a graph of the US population we can see that these timeframes do not align in such a way as to dismiss the percentage increase of voters (below). In fact, there has never been a point where the U.S. population has dropped so suddenly to explain such a rise. The question is why?…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the election of 1912, candidates Woodrow Wilson, Theodore Roosevelt, William Taft and Eugene Debs competed for the spot as President of the United States. Wilson represented the Democratic Party, Roosevelt, the Progressive, Taft, the Republican and Debs, the Socialist. Although there were four candidates in the running, most would agree that the real competition was between Wilson and Roosevelt. A few of the many issues during the time of this election concerned trusts, women’s suffrage and tariffs. Wilson thought that trusts, or big monopolistic businesses, should be eliminated all together, while Roosevelt wanted to place limits on them. Roosevelt openly supported women’s suffrage and Wilson wanted individual states to decide voting rights…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Election of 1896 Response

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The election of 1896 between the Republicans, gold Democrats, silver Democrats, Prohibitionists, People’s Party, Socialists/Labor Party, and the Silver Party ended in the election of Republican candidate William McKinley. I personally believe McKinley was the correct choice for America during the election. Several of the other parties remained neutral on certain policies that were troubling our country while others chose to focus entirely on one principle, ignoring several problems facing the US. The Republican Party promoted the Dingley Tariff, preventing foreign workforces to take jobs from desperate American citizens, the Gold Standard, a fixed international currency that American specie would be based on, women’s suffrage, and the rights of colored people. Taking a stand on several issues ignored by other parties, the Republicans stood in a way which simultaneously appealed to the largest voting mass and did the most to advance American people. With each political stance, McKinley stabilized the problems facing Americans and others involved in our economic and political systems. By preventing mass immigration to continue, he allowed several Americans to find work where it had previously been difficult. The Gold standard, although thought to risk and ruin farmers with debts, stabilized the fragile American economy allowing it to flourish after the election. By standing for women’s suffrage and colored rights, McKinley included those who felt oppressed by former American leaders and laws giving them American support and allowing them to advance in all aspects of America. McKinley’s political and economic views made him the best candidate for the election of 1896 and the best 25th President for…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Australian liberal party was found in 1944 in Canberra. Robert Menzies was the leader of opposition and the prime minister (1939-41) for the United Australia party. Though his belief to provide freedom and choice than that offered under Labour’s post was key to the start of a new political power. He believed that the non-labour parties should unite and present a stronger alternative government to the people of Australia. On October 16, 1944, the new arising force united the different political parties and adopted the name The Liberal Party of…

    • 92 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A.J Balfour was an intelligent man yet lacked political skills causing him to make poorly judged decisions leading to a decrease in conservative’s votes. During the Boer War, 1898-1902, Balfour used Britain’s patriotism to help the Tories win the 1900 ‘Khati Election’. By doing this it allowed Britain to stay involved in the Boer war, not knowing that war would last 4 years and cost Britain over 210 million pounds. This highlighted to the British people how the Conservatives neglect poverty and social reform, and by 1902 it was officially reported by the army high command that nearly two-thirds of those who had volunteered to join the services failed to pass their basic medical test. This information was further supported by Charles Booth and Seebohn Rowntree’s research, as Booth published 17 volumes on the life and labour of London’s poor between 1889 and 1903. Rowntree set out to test Booth’s statistics in York and began his investigation in 1899. Their conclusions stated that 30% of the urban population would be classified as ‘poor’ and that about 20% might be classified as ‘very poor’ or as living in ‘primary poverty’. Booth and Rowntree’s research later proved that more than a quarter of the population lived below the subsistence level, highlighting that people where too malnourished and medically unfit to be accepted into the army. Subsequently the Conservatives lost nine seats in the general election 1900, whilst both liberal and labour gained seven and two seats.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The 1964 election changed the British political landscape forever as a thirteen-year Conservative dominance crumbled at the hands of Harold Wilson and his youthful Labour Party. Historians, such as Rowe, postulate that there are a plethora of reasons to why Labour won the 1964 election, most prominently because of the Conservatives’ inability to economically modernise Britain. Contrastingly, other historians such as Lynch uphold the opinion that there are other factors responsible for Labour’s victory, including Labour’s prominence in areas of politics where the Conservatives lacked…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lloyd-George held a massive majority and popularity in 1918 as he seemed irremovable from office, this was however starkly contrasted by the 1922 election where his popularity drastically dropped and he managed only to scrap the bottom of the barrel for votes leaving him with only a small amount of seats. There were many reasons for this one of the most important ones was his own mistakes; such as how he faced a lot of problems on the issue of Germany, and how he should deal with it. He required a strong Germany for trade, however the populace of Britain was out for blood on Germany for in their eyes causing World War 1. In the end he led a middle of the ground stance between Roosevelt and Clemenceau. This was met with opposition who believe that he was too soft on Germany. This effected people’s opinions of him quite a bit, as he promised to “bleed Germany dry” and didn’t deliver, furthermore a lot of people’s relatives had died during WW1 leading to them seeing revenge as not being delivered. Another key issue he faced was the Irish crisis, which had been plaguing Britain for the early half of the 20th century. Even after he passed the Home Rule Bill which gave limited self-government to Ireland Sinn Fein the independence movement was still popular, this was partly due to during the war the self-government was revoked, and after the Easter rising their opinion in Ireland had spike to an all-time high. This was also polarised by the Ulster nationalist who believed that all the nationalists were “Traitors and deserved to be shot.” This then escalated and led to an all-out civil war in Ireland between the Ulster Nationalists/British and the IRA. LG decided to form the Black and Tans a counter terrorist movement to try and stop the IRA, however most of them were Ulster nationalists and ruthless towards the southerners even those who were innocent. This gained the support…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays