Preview

How Opportunities Develop in Social Entrepreneurship

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
12947 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Opportunities Develop in Social Entrepreneurship
1042-2587
© 2010 Baylor University

E T&P

How Opportunities
Develop in Social
Entrepreneurship
Patricia Doyle Corner
Marcus Ho

The purpose of this article was to extend existing research on opportunity identification in the social entrepreneurship literature through empirically examining this phenomenon. We used an inductive, theory-building design that surfaced patterns in social value creation across multiple case studies. The patterns showed actors seeing a social need and prospecting ideas that could address it. Data also revealed multiple, not individual, actors, dynamically engaged in interactions that nudged an opportunity into manifestation. Also, data suggested complementarities to effectuation and rational/economic processes that are divergent theoretical approaches to the study of entrepreneurship to date.

T

he term social entrepreneurship (SE) covers a range of societal trends, organizational forms and structures, and individual initiatives (Roper & Cheney, 2005). It has been broadly conceptualized as projects that reflect two key elements: an overarching social mission and entrepreneurial creativity (Nicholls, 2006; Peredo & McLean, 2006). Much of the research on SE to date has focused on defining and describing this phenomenon
(Hockerts, 2006; Mair & Marti, 2006). Strongly featured in these descriptions is the idea of opportunity recognition or the identification of opportunities to solve social problems or create social value (Dees, 2001, 2007; Mair & Marti; Peredo & McLean; Shaw &
Carter, 2007; Thompson, 2002; Weerawardena & Mort, 2006). SE, thus, is similar to commercial entrepreneurship in that the recognition of opportunities to create or innovate is the initiation point of the entrepreneurial process (Austin, Stevenson, & Wei-Skillern,
2006). However, scholars suggest that opportunities for SE are likely to be distinct from opportunities in the commercial sector and need to be examined in their own right
(Dorado,



References: Alter, S. (2006). Social enterprise models and their mission and money. In A. Nicholls (Ed.), Social entrepreneurship (pp Alvarez, S. & Barney, J. (2007). Discovery and creation: Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1–22. Cassons, M. (1982). The entrepreneur. Totowa, NJ: Barnes and Noble Books. Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Covin, J. & Slevin, D. (1986). The development and testing of a firm-level entrepreneurship scale. Frontiers of entrepreneurship Davidsson, P. & Wicklund, J. (2001). Levels of analysis in entrepreneurship research: Current research practice and suggestions for the future Dees, J.G. (2001). The meaning of “social entrepreneurship”. Available at http://www.fuqua.duke.edu/ centers/case/documents/dees_SE.pdf, accessed 24 May 2007. Dees, J.G. (2007). Taking social entrepreneurship seriously. Society, 44(3), 24–31. Dorado, S. (2006). Social entrepreneurial ventures: Different values so different processes of creation, no? Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 11(4), 319–343. Drucker, P. (1993). Innovation and entrepreneurship. New York: Harper Business. Eckhardt, J. & Shane, S. (2003). Opportunities and entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3), 333– 349. Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 488–511. Eisenhardt, K. & Graebner, M. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. Foss, N. & Klein, P. (2005). Entrepreneurship and the economic theory of the firm: Any gains from trade? In R Galunic, D.C. & Eisenhardt, K. (1996). The evolution of intracorporate domains: Divisional charter losses in high-technology, multidivisional corporations Galunic, D.C. & Eisenhardt, K. (2001). Architectural innovation and modular corporate forms. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1229–1249. Goldstein, J., Hazy, J., & Silberstang, J. (2008). Complexity and social entrepreneurship: A fortuitous meeting Hockerts, K. (2006). Entrepreneurial opportunity in social purpose ventures. In J. Mair, J. Robinson, & K. Koslowski, S.W.J. & Klein, K. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes Mair, J. (2006). Introduction to part II: Exploring the intentions and opportunities behind social entrepreneurship. In J. Mair, J. Robinson, & K. Hockerts (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship (pp. 89–94). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Mair, J. & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Mair, J. & Noboa, E. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: How intentions to create a social venture are formed. July, 2010 657 McKelvey, B. (2004). Toward a complexity science of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(3), 313–341. Miles, M. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Mort, G., Weerawardena, J., & Carnegie, K. (2003). Social entrepreneurship: Towards conceptualization. Nicholls, A. (2006). Introduction. In A. Nicholls (Ed.), Social entrepreneurship (pp. 1–35). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Peredo, A. & McLean, M. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept. Journal of World Business, 41, 56–65. Robinson, J. (2006). Navigating social and institutional barriers to markets: How social entrepreneurs identify and evaluate opportunities Roper, J. & Cheney, G. (2005). The meanings of social entrepreneurship today. Corporate Governance, 5(3), 95–104. Sarasvathy, S. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency Sarasvathy, S. & Dew, N. (2008). Effectuation and overtrust: Debating Goel and Karri. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(4), 727–737. Sarasvathy, S., Dew, N., Velamuri, S.R., & Venkataraman, S. (2003). Three views of entrepreneurial opportunity. In Z.J. Acs & D.B. Audretsch (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship (pp. 141–160). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Sautet, F. (2002). An entrepreneurial theory of the firm. London: Routledge. Sfeir-Younis, A. (2002). The spiritual entrepreneur. Reflections, 3(3), 43–45. Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4), 448–469. Shane, S. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar. Shane, S. & Venkataraman, N. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226. Shaw, E. & Carter, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: Theoretical antecedents and empirical analysis of entrepreneurial processes and outcomes Shumpeter, J. (1976). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. London: George Allan and Unwin. Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 20–24. Singh, R. (2001). A comment on developing the field of entrepreneurship through the study of opportunity recognition and exploitation Thompson, J. (2002). The world of the social entrepreneur. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15(5), 412–431. Townsend, D. & Hart, T. (2008). Perceived institutional ambiguity and the choice of organizational form in social entrepreneurial ventures

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    social entrepreneurship: what it is, key facets, stakeholders, how it compares to traditional entrepreneurship, how it compares to charity, examples…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a popular writer by the name of David Brooks. According to the text book (“Good Reasons pg. 362”). David is from New York and has written articles for Wall Street, New York Times, PBS as well as other books and magazines. David wrote a piece entitled “Sam Spade at Starbucks”. In this article David talks about, what he refers to as social entrepreneurship. Mr. Brooks explains that although it is a good thing to want to do well, help others and change the world, it cannot happen if there is a disregard for politics, because without governing laws and directives, the people or the cause they are fighting to change will perish.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Greeks and the Romans were among the most influential societies in the history of the world. Evidence of Greek or Roman influence can be found in almost every culture or country that has ever existed. Though both cultures were different in practice and incredibly competitive with one another, their politics and their beliefs set the stage for future civilizations, including those of the modern world. In particular, the values and practices of Greek and Roman citizenship and politics, more than any other cultures, influences American policies today in terms of values, government, and self-image.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Three Pillars

    • 1112 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Tuck, R., Zietsma, C., (2012), First, do no harm: evaluating resources for teaching social entrepreneurship, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 11(3) 512-517.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bornstein’s main argument in this chapter is that motivation is intrinsic for success in social entrepreneurship. A person must be willing to constantly improve their ideas and must be humble enough to step back and let others take credit when needed. The strengths of Bornstein’s ideas are that since he has done so much research in writing his book, there are many examples of each of his points, showing that these points are applicable to the real world. However one major weakness of this chapter is that Bornstein does not provide the young reader with the ways to begin to exhibit his six qualities. Furthermore, Bornstein does not take into account how difficult abiding by his six points might be for some, if it does not come easily to not take credit or to self-correct a mistake. Overall, however, Bornstein is effective in explaining why successful social entrepreneurs are successful and in giving future social entrepreneurs the means by which they can achieve their goals and make their ideas a…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    b. Social entrepreneurship arises from an unconscious spirit of generosity within various people who produce a facility to envision, resource and enable activity which otherwise exists as unmet need. Need is lessened by a social entrepreneur who possesses unique qualities to match the need.…

    • 875 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    MID TERM STUDY GUIDE

    • 4723 Words
    • 13 Pages

    BUSN 115 Week 1 Discussions 1 In What Manner is Wal-Mart Influencing America? Posted by All Students 54 PagesDo Wal-Mart's business practices raise or lower our standard of living? How? Why do you think this is so? Is Wal-Mart's business strategy fair and equitable to all parties? Why or why not?BUSN 115 Week 1 Discussions 1 Can Social Entrepreneurship Succeed? Posted by All Students 47 PagesWhat are the risks for a social entrepreneur? Why? What are the benefits for a social entrepreneur? Why? What are the similarities and differences between business entrepreneurs and social entrepreneurs? Why is this important to consider and discuss? Can social entrepreneurship be successful in our capitalistic society; if so, how? Why? If not, why not? What should be changed in our capitalistic society to assist social entrepreneurs in becoming successful? Why? Would strict capitalists recommend such changes in order to accommodate social entrepreneurs? How?…

    • 4723 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Stevenson, H. H. (2006, April 13). A Perspective on Entrepreneurship. Harvard Business School, 9(131), 1-12.…

    • 3103 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Last summer after delving into some of the works of Milton Friedman (“Capitalism and Freedom” and “Free to choose”) I became convinced by his philosophy of free market Capitalism. However, attending Stanford’s Social Entrepreneurship Course made me reconsider so much of my worldview. Milton Friedman had convinced that the only social responsibility of a company should be to deliver a profit to its shareholders. However this directly contradicts the ethos of social entrepreneurship, whereby human and environmental well-being are maximized not profit.…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think the idea points out what makes social entrepreneurs special. They push boundaries, they hardly abide the rules. An entrepreneur is someone who takes matter into his/her own hands and creates something unique to solve a pre-existing problem. A social entrepreneur does so to help a community overcome a hardship. And sometimes this exceeds the “norms and boundaries” usually presented within institutional efforts. An example of such an effort is sometimes we all know that the majority of charity money is consumed, not by the people in need, but by the powerful corrupted individuals who…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Shane, S & Venkataraman S 2000, ‘The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research’, The Academy of Management Review, 25(1): 217-226…

    • 2552 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    3. Shane, S. and Venkataraman, S. (2000). "The Promise of Entrepreneurship as A Field of Research", Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226.…

    • 3139 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unlike social providers, social entrepreneurs clearly aspire to definitely and systematically transform an unjust societal condition. In contrast to social advocates, social entrepreneurs act directly, creating products, services, or processes that motivate the transformation of the status quo. Moreover, social entrepreneurs work in "methods that do not fit neatly into the traditional modes of government and business." Whereas businesses are constrained by a need to earn profits, and government-led change efforts are designed to provide services to citizens rather than cultivate new customers, social entrepreneurs are able to "negotiate these constraints. The creative combination of elements from both poles...is what enables social entrepreneurs to build models designed for a particular…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    3. Latifee, A. (2013, 6 30). Social business: A new window of poverty alleviation. The Financial Express.…

    • 4070 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    leadership paper

    • 3446 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Social entrepreneurs are the individuals with business insight and who want to for a social cause. They can provide the new approaches needed to fasten the process of reducing poverty and hunger. By combining and developing the innovative ideas from individuals and investments from public, private, and civil society organizations, the entrepreneurs can guide complex global food systems and rural institutions toward their goals…

    • 3446 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics