Preview

How Perspectives on Nuclear Power Differ by Age Groups

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
724 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Perspectives on Nuclear Power Differ by Age Groups
How perspectives on Nuclear Power differ by age groups

Alexandra Coleman
3/3/12
Period 7

Purpose: To determine how nuclear power effect’s the elderly opinion versus the younger age groups.
Hypothesis: I hypothesize the elderly to be more opposed to nuclear energy than the younger generation.



Materials:
Survey Questions
People

Procedure:
Create a survey consisting of 8 questions or more.
Pass out the survey to every 5th person in your local area

Data:
Question 1: How much do you know about nuclear power?


Question 2: Do you think nuclear power should continue to be used in the future?


Question 3: Would you be opposed to a nuclear power plant being put up in your local area?


Question 4: Do you think nuclear power should be used as an alternative source of energy?


Question 5: Do you think nuclear power is more efficient in comparison to other energy-related sources?


Question 6: Do you believe nuclear power is more safe in the United States than other parts of the world?


Question 7: Have recent events concerning nuclear power plants in Japan caused you to become more or less opposed to nuclear power?


Question 8: Are you aware of the nuclear power incidents at Three Mile Island and Chernobyl?


Processed Data:

 

 











Conclusion:
Overall this survey proved that although more people below the age of 50 are willing to support nuclear power or is comfortable with it being a main energy source, the idea of nuclear power being continued in the future or being used now is mostly opposed by both ages below and above 50. So in the end my hypothesis proved false because both age groups have similar outlooks on nuclear power.

Analysis:
I hypothesized that people over the age of 50 would more opposed to nuclear power rather than people below the age of 50 because they would less

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Due by Day 7 . Nuclear Power . All energy sources have drawbacks. Even the clean hydropower option has negative ramifications. Weigh those against the possible consequences of developing nuclear power, a controversial alternative to fossil fuels. Discuss the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster as well as the 20th century Chernobyl nuclear meltdown in drawing conclusions about risk versus reward of nuclear energy use. The paper must be two to three pages in length and formatted according to APA style. You must use at least one scholarly source other than the textbook to support your points. Cite your sources in text and on the reference page. For information regarding APA samples and tutorials, visit the Ashford Writing Center, within the Learning Resources tab on the left navigation toolbar, in your online course.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tucker Nuclear Summary

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In order to remain at the forefront of technological innovation and industrial prowess, the United States must become cognizant that the use of nuclear energy is by far the most efficient policy regarding the creation of power despite the possible risks. This is the belief of William Tucker, the author of the New York Times published article, “Why I Still Support Nuclear Power, Even after Fukushima”.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear powers biggest threat is from the public’s perception of it. As seen in Germany as well as throughout Europe, if the public deems something too unsafe and does not want to live near it, the governments will have no choice but to shut down the plants and look for different sources of energy. Compared to biofuels and solar power, nuclear power is already extremely established and generates a large share of the worlds’ power, and faces most of its issues in the political realm instead of the practical…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Three Mile Island Effects

    • 3565 Words
    • 15 Pages

    that the release of radioactive materials from a nuclear power plant was a major concern…

    • 3565 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people around the world ask themselves what are the disadvantages of adopting an alternative solution to solve the consumption of global nuclear energy? Based on what we have experienced through events with major disasters and the aftermath of many casualties, it has summed up to result in having failures outgrowing expectations. Therefore, global nuclear power usage is to be opposed due to the fact that it comes with high financial costs, nuclear waste management complications, and the fact that thousands in populations are mass numbers of casualties.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    labouring the Walmart way

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    First off all, what is the nuclear? Many countries use nuclear energy to generate electricity. “Unclear is the energy stored in the center or the nucleus of an atom. After we bombard the nucleus into two parts, two different elements are formed along with the emission of high energy. The process generally followed is called fission. Fission is the chain reaction which needs uranium-235.”(“Fission and fusion”)The nuclear energy is considered as the worthiest alternative resource of energy after fossil fuels, but it also has a lot of potential problems.”(“Nuclear Energy”)…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    * Discuss the scientific and technical concepts related to the use of nuclear power as an energy resource. Address the following in your response:…

    • 1935 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eart Science Review

    • 2335 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Suppose an electric-generating power plant is about to be built near your house. The local government has not decided whether to allow coal, nuclear, or oil as fuel for the plant (natural gas is not an option). Some groups argue coal is the best choice because there is a 200-year supply and using coal reduces our dependence on foreign oil. Critics argue that burning coal produces three times more global-warming gasses than oil. Coal also produces more dust and expels more acid-rain-causing gases than oil. Others argue that nuclear-generated power produces no greenhouse gases and no other atmospheric pollution. Critics argue that there is presently no long-term location to store the radioactive waste that will be generated and question the safety of nuclear power. Over the life of the plant, nuclear is the least expensive option, followed by coal and then oil.…

    • 2335 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oregon Trail

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Oregon Trail is a 2,000 mile route for large wagons. The trail began by fur trappers and traders from 1811 to 1840. The only way you could pass was by foot or on a horse. By the 1846-1869 the trail was used by about 400,000 settlers, ranchers, farmers, miners, and businessmen and their families. William Clark founded the path but it wasn’t discovered until 1859 that they could actually walk the path that connected the Missouri River to the Columbia River. The West part of the trail connected the states Idaho and Oregon. The route was very dangerous but the deaths aren’t precise. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_Trail) There is a chart here that states the Causes and estimated deaths during this trail.…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Weeks, Jennifer. “Nuclear Energy: Should the U.S. build more nuclear power plants?” CQ Researcher 16.10 (2006): 217-240. CQ Researcher Online. Web. 2 Dec. 2009.…

    • 2071 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many professors, scientists, researchers, and even governments, have been debating over the issue on the use of nuclear power as a main energy source. In Taking Sides, two authors who are highly narrow-minded state their debates on this critical issue. Allison MacFarlane, author of “Nuclear Power: Panacea for Future Energy Needs?”, believes that nuclear power should be revived. She argues that nuclear power will provide sufficient energy, while at the same time reducing carbon dioxide emissions. On the other hand, professor Kristin Shrader-Frechette, author of “Five Myths About Nuclear Energy”, argues that nuclear power is too expensive and unsafe for the environment, when there are renewable energy sources that are better for the environment and economy. I agree with Shrader-Frechette because she proves the five myths about nuclear energy wrong using extremely valid arguments, which exist to prove that nuclear power is not the best option for an energy source in our society.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear Power- Ethics Study

    • 42811 Words
    • 172 Pages

    Report consists of 98 pages in total, including the Executive Summary , Bibliography and Addendas.…

    • 42811 Words
    • 172 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nuclear Power Greenpeace argues that there is nothing ‘peaceful’ about the nuclear industry. It is harmful to the environment as well as all living creatures. The Nuclear Age began in 1945 and ever since Greenpeace began, they have been trying to fight it. There has been much progress made. In 2000 nuclear powerful was discredited during the UN Climate Change talks. In 2001 the UN Sustainability Development Conference declared nuclear as an unsustainable technology.…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nuclear Power Plants

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The question of whether the U.S. should have nuclear power plants is very controversial. There are two sides that one can take; however, both sides have their own share of problems. If you chose to not have nuclear plants, then eventually all natural resources will run out. The oil supply will run out relatively soon, and all other sources will run out too. The natural resources that we have now are still harmful to the earth however. The gas which we use for our cars pollutes the air and considering the amount of cars the are driven each day, it is ripping apart the o-zone layer. However, if the U.S. does decide to use nuclear plants, then there is a great danger of toxic waste invading our rivers, and also the chance of a spill similar to Chernobyl. As we saw in the Chernobyl video, there is great danger when using nuclear energy. If this were to happen is the United States, the risk of mortality is much higher because the area's in which there would be a plant such as a big city are very densely populated. Because of these facts, I do not think that the U.S. should renew its efforts to develop more nuclear plants.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that "Nuclear energy is NOT the best way to meet the ever-increasing energy needs of the planet." We would like to define the term the energy needs, and in this debate it will only apply to the electricity energy needs of the planet. There are four main arguments that we would like to state.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays