Preview

How Successful Was The Stalin Regime In Russia During The 1930's

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2331 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Successful Was The Stalin Regime In Russia During The 1930's
The people of Soviet population encountered very many hardships during the 1930’s and this can be attributed to Stalin’s poor leadership compared to the leaders before him Lenin. He took initiatives to replace the systems employed by Lenin and in introduce communism that was expected to favor the adverse industrialization advocated for by Stalin. To achieve this industrialization, Stalin used harsh and ruthless measures that saw extreme suffering and death of thousands of Soviet population. The first group that was negatively affected by the Stalin regime was the peasant farmers who were the wealthy community in the previous decades and controlled all agricultural activities . These people were the wealthiest and were responsible for all grains and meat consumed by the Soviet population. However, …show more content…
According to Stalin, the Kulaks held the grains with the need of raising the prizes and he opted for requisition of the grains. The increased seizures of the kulak grains came as a great discouragement to the kulaks that were unwilling to plant grain that would be taken away by the government in its seizures. This situation worsened the condition of the grain shortage and this led to the introduction of the Ural-Siberian Method for obtaining the grains from the kulaks and the middle men as well . The government took illegal methods to attain the grains from the people as well including violence that saw eruption of violence as people resisted requisition of the grains. With the increased resistance to give out their grains, the Stalin government introduced the idea of grain collectivization. Collecting of the kulaks farms was introduced that was handed over to cooperation. With the introduction of the idea of collectivization, the New Economy Policy came to an end that had previously given farmers an opportunity to participate in free markets as they sold their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The peasants were essentially bound to their land as they had no access to funds or passports to travel. The two types of farms faced disadvantages, for example the Kolkhozy farms (collective state farms) had to meet state obligations which were 60-70% of their output and only received trivial rewards in return (such as sacks of potatoes). Even though the war had caused so many deaths, the Politburo remained to see the peasants as disposable after the war. Also Stalin did not trust the peasants as he said they were “too individualistic to make good socialists” and therefore increased the taxes on them. So this is not recovery as the lifestyle, especially for peasants, got worse.…

    • 1813 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Soviet Union DBQ

    • 840 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Stalin was a part of the Bolsheviks which was the communist party of the Soviet Union. The Kulaks were the wealthy landowners and they were capitalists and did not approve of Stalin’s beliefs and methods. One of the changes Stalin implemented in order to achieve his one of his many goals, was to collective farms. Collectivization is the act of seizing land from the wealthy (which in this case were the Kulaks) and using it for communal use. This means that the Kulaks’ farms would get broken up to little parts and given to the peasants. In document 4, an excerpt from a speech that Stalin delivered in 1929 he says, “The socialist way, which is to set up collective farms and state farms into large collective farms, technically and scientifically equipped, and to the squeezing out of the capitalist elements from agriculture.” Stalin was determined to remove any and all capitalist that were not in his favor. Another change Stalin implemented was to stop feeding the livestock with the wheat being grown. In document 5, there is a graph showing the declination of the livestock in the first and second five year plan. In a total of 10 years, the amount of livestock was virtually cut in half! In comparison, the wheat production increased significantly in the ten years in which the livestock was cut in half. The wheat being…

    • 840 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Collectivisation was the process by which Russian agriculture was reformed, small farm were merged into larger units, in hope of production becoming more efficient and increasing its output. Stalin was aware of the increasing possibility of a war with Germany and so self-efficiency in food production became more imminently important in order to survive a war against the western powers. From 1927-1929 harvests fell, simultaneously affecting the wider economy. The government needed to sell grain abroad so they could receive the foreign currency necessary for resources needed for industrialisation. Collectivisation was therefore introduced to increase efficiency and introduce mechanisation. This added urgency to a need to increase output meant that high targets were set which were met with incentives and also punishments, pushing the economy towards its maximum potential making the essential contribution to the transformation of the Russian economy.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the years 1906 – 1914, Peter Stolypin was pushing to de – revolutionise the peasantry and put into place economic reform, and there is evidence of this working. During these years large amounts of agricultural reform were set in motion. In 1906 45.9 million tonnes of agricultural production was produced, by 1913 this had grown significantly to 61.7 million tonnes. The massive change in the amount of product shows that agricultural and therefore economic reform had taken place. Farmers, at this time, had also started paying higher taxes, which is sign of higher income, again strengthening this idea of economic reform occurring. Stolypin, however successful he was in his endeavours, was pushing fiercely for a more independent and de-revolutionised peasantry. During November 1906, huge action was taken to change the way the peasants lived. They were freed from the constraints of commune control and land banks were set up to give money to those peasants who chose to leave. Many were also encouraged to move to Siberia, all of these reforms were starting to lay a foundation for a more independent peasantry. Economic reform was being pursued desperately by members of the government such as Stolypin, this can been seen by the copious amount of law, for example peasants leaving commune control, being put into place. The fact these laws were coming about shows that Russia was undergoing economic reform to some extent during this period, whether it was successful or not.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Joseph Stalin Dbq Analysis

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Joseph Stalin established a modern totalitarian government in Soviet Russia. He is known as the “Man of Steel”. A totalitarianism is a type of government that takes total, centralized, state control over every aspect of public and private life of their people. His rule had changed the people of his empire in numerous ways. Stalin had total control over economic needs. According to document 6 “By 1940 Russia produced more pig iron than Germany, and far more than Britain or France. Numbers of cattle grew in the 1920s, but fell increasingly during the collectivization of agriculture after 1929, and by 1940 hardly exceeded the figure for 1920. Since 1940 the industrial development of the Soviet Union has been impressive, but agricultural production has continued to be plumiding”. The document illustrates how pig iron had significantly increased as a result of the “Five Year Plan”, however heavy industry led to expense of food supplies. This would cause limited production of consumer goods. It caused a step back because of the severe shortages of housing, food, clothing as well as other necessary goods. The Five Year Plan didn’t help much to excel their economic as Stalin hoped, it impacted by creating famine. Stalin rising to power promised an economic boom for Russia however, in that process many people suffered and died of starvation. According to document 5, “The purge began its last,…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Collectivization was designed to modernize Russia’s agriculture by merging farms and placing them under state control. In the short term, this policy resulted in famines and Stalin’s ‘war’ against the Kulaks; wealthy peasants who opposed communism. By 1935, 5 million people had died from starvation and all 7 million Kulaks had been liquidized, through shooting or the labour camps or ‘Gulags’. However, by 1939, Collectivization was working efficiently with 99% of land merged and 90% of peasants living ¼ of a million Kolkhoz. Although at a heavy price, the exports needed to obtain the capitol for industrialization had been acquired.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin imposed collectivism, which took all the farm land from the Kulaks, leaving them homeless and unemployed It was forbidden to give aid to the Kulaks, and eventually they were forced in to slavery to survive, and any Kulak who refused slavery was deported Forced Famine under the rule of Joseph Stalin By 1932, 75% of all farmland had been acquired by Stalin’s regime and he was exporting so much food from this region, there was no food left to feed the Ukranian people (Trueman, 2013) The Ukranian Communist party reached out for support from the Soviet Communist party and were soon stamped out by Stalin’s loyal soldiers, sent to subdue the Ukranians Starvation was so prevalent that people fled the country side to larger cities, only to find starvation there as well, with bodies of the dead lining the streets Forced Famine under the rule of Joseph Stalin…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stalinism, the term used to embody the form of government experienced by the Soviet Union under Stalin’s rule, had a significant and lasting impact on the USSR. Stalinism impacted on several aspects of life. Collectivisation was introduced which assisted in the funding of industrialisation, terror was used to create a communist state. Stalin centralised every aspect of life, from the single leadership of Stalin himself to party control of the state and its functions. Free will disappeared and service to the state was expected. Consequently a Stalinist state which had a major impact on the USSR was created.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Joseph Stalin forced the Ukrainian famine in order to undermine the nationalistic pride of the Ukrainians. Vladimir Lenin’s actions to resolve the resentment in Ukraine were unacceptable to Stalin. Lenin stopped exporting a large amount of the country’s grain and also encouraged a free-market way of exchanging goods. Lenin’s relaxed rule renewed the people’s interest in celebrating their language, customs, poetry, art, music and Ukrainian Orthodox religion. The Ukrainians’ independent spirit made them a threat to Joseph Stalin. When he wanted to build a strong industrial base, the Ukrainians did not stray from their peasant traditions. When Stalin wanted to abolish private ownership of land, the people refused to give up their land. On December 27, 1929, Joseph Stalin announced his plan to force the remaining Ukrainian peasants onto government-owned collective farms. In order to destroy the people seeking independence from Soviet rule, Stalin deprived the Ukrainians of their own food supplies (The History Place-…

    • 1914 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In these the peasants worked together to fulfil a productive plan. They did not own the land so they could not sell the produce for themselves. All carts, horses, tools and cattle had to be given over to the kolkhoz. Most peasants hated this system, especially the better-off ones called kulaks. So Stalin decided to ‘wipe them out as a class’.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thematic Essay Leaders

    • 1115 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kulaks: a category of relatively affluent farmers in the later Russian Empire, Soviet Russia, and early Soviet Union.…

    • 1115 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Remember, Lenin had taken land from wealthy landowners and had given the peasants their own small farms. In 1928, Stalin announced that all family farms would be abolished. They would be replaced by collective farms, or large farms worked by hundreds of families. The government expected that these collective farms, with the help of modern technology, would produce more food with fewer workers. The members of the collective farm worked the land together. They owned the machinery together. They divided what the collective farm produced according to the work each had done. The Communists liked the collective farms. The government could control the peasants better on collectives than on millions of small farms. The Communists also thought the family farms were too small and poor to use machinery. On the collective farms people were supposed to have tractors and machines. Fewer people could do more work and produce more food. This would free up people to work in the new mines and…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “A severe shortfall in grain prompted Stalin to push for the collectivization of agriculture and the seizure of grain stored by the kulak farmers (farmers who owned their own land)”(Mass). To carry Stalin’s plan out, the Soviet Union set policies of mass agriculture and forced the collectivization through the First Five Year Plan of 1928, which was supposed to last up until 1933. “Through his collectivization policy, Stalin’s goal was to increase productivity from the farmers through eliminating small, privately-held farms and turning to mass agricultural policies” (“The Holodomor”). Because many people were resisting and revolting against his rule, Stalin began to starve them by taking their food, animals, and crops away. This lead towards the deaths of millions of people by either starvation, cannibalism, or…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We must remember to not brush over the negative aspects. First, Stalin developed his system of collective farming which combined once privately owned forms into large farms operated by the government. This put an end to individual profit and also an end to personal interest since the government had control of everything, As Stalin proclaimed in Document 4, he saids that with his new system, the state must come first, individuals second. Not only were the individuals of Russia undermined, they were tortured, executed or exiled if they dared oppose Stalin’s policies. Continuing with the system of collective farming, kulaks, rich farmers disliked Stalin’s system and openly resisted. Stalin immediately determined that the kulaks were a problem in his reign and that they must be eliminated. The kulaks were deported to forced labor camps or to Siberia. Stalin also used a forced famine in Ukraine to torture and control his people as stated in document 7. In addition, in order to control his population of people and provide positive views of himself, many posters such as the one shown in document 10 were shown to the public for that Stalin could gain liking. in addition, Stalin went as far as to use false trials to create and instill fear in his people. The accounts of the French ambassador as depicted the atrocities of such…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stalin himself justified his policy of rapid industrialisation and collectivisation at the 1926 Party Congress as one that sought to achieve ' the transformation of our country from an agrarian to an industrial one, capable by its own efforts of producing the necessary means of production.' This socialist notion of economic autarky, although admirable and unifying in its intentions, would indeed inevitably bring about damaging effects for the people of Russia. But how intensive and extensive was this damage - and was damage the only significant effect for the Russian people?…

    • 1864 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays