This shows that despite the growth in wages and the working class, people were not paid enough for the work that they were doing. Having to rely on children to contribute financially to the household is something that should never have to be done. The owners of these large industries had no care for this consequence and only placed importance on making sure that they were seeing most of the profit, and the government was also complacent in this mistreatment of workers. The federal government protected big businesses because of the boost they brought to the economy. When workers’ unrest and displeasure with their treatment grew, they began to organize labor unions and go on strike. A famous example of a strike during this time is the case of In re Debs (1895), which was in response to the Eugene v. Debs case where railroad workers boycotted Pullman cars. As a result of In re Debs, “..the Supreme Court approved the use of court injunctions against strikes, which gave employers a very powerful legal weapon to break unions,” (Newman & Schmalbach
This shows that despite the growth in wages and the working class, people were not paid enough for the work that they were doing. Having to rely on children to contribute financially to the household is something that should never have to be done. The owners of these large industries had no care for this consequence and only placed importance on making sure that they were seeing most of the profit, and the government was also complacent in this mistreatment of workers. The federal government protected big businesses because of the boost they brought to the economy. When workers’ unrest and displeasure with their treatment grew, they began to organize labor unions and go on strike. A famous example of a strike during this time is the case of In re Debs (1895), which was in response to the Eugene v. Debs case where railroad workers boycotted Pullman cars. As a result of In re Debs, “..the Supreme Court approved the use of court injunctions against strikes, which gave employers a very powerful legal weapon to break unions,” (Newman & Schmalbach