Preview

How the constitution guards against tyranny

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
750 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How the constitution guards against tyranny
Could you imagine what the United States would be like if our government didn't protect us from tyranny? Luckily, due to the constitution our founding fathers created, we don't have to worry about tyranny happening any time soon! Written in Philadelphia, 1787, the constitution was made to replace the articles of confederation which were too weak to hold the government together or to be effective. Their objectives for writing it was to ensure that the government was strong nationally and able to run smoothly without allowing any one group to have all the power, or in other words, tyranny to take place. What they came up with was four ways to guard against this, including, federalism, checks and balances, separation of powers, and representation in the House and Senate.

The first guard against tyranny, federalism, meant that the government divided it's powers between the federal and the state governments. "The power surrendered by the people is first divided between two distinct governments, and the portion allotted to each subdivide among distinct and separate departments" (Document A). By creating two Separate governments, it creates a system that balances itself, and then creates another balance or double security by having branches within those governments that check each other to make sure that there is no abuses of power. The way in which they assign these powers to each government, as stated in document B, is to reserve all powers not delegated to the national government to the state government. This protects against tyranny because it keeps the federal and states Separate but even at the same time so neither can surpass the other in amounts of power.

The second guard against tyranny is the separation of powers, which organizes the different departments within each government in such a way that each branch is separate from each other, and have different duties to carry out. Document C states that "The accumulation of all powers...in the same hands,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Document A Federalism it answers the question of why did the constitution guard against tyranny they guard against to portion allotted to each subdivided among distinct and separate departments They divided state/national into something that both governments wouldn’t have too much power. Central government and state are the two pieces that make up Madison's compound government. Central government has powers needed to run the nation, and state government has important local powers.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the year of 1787, delegates met in Philadelphia to write the Constitution. Tyranny, a type of government with an absolute ruler was a fear. They were currently under the ARticles of COnfederation. There was a problem with this though. In the background essay, it states that “there was no chief executive, there was no court system, there was not even a way for a central government to force a state to pay taxes.”. They were in much need of a new Constitution if they were going to be an independent nation. The hard part was making the new government tyranny free. Eventually in 1787 the new Constitution is created.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Constitution guarded against tyranny through checks and balances. Checks and Balances is where the three branches work together to make sure no one branch has too much power. Each branch receives control over the other branches. James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay wrote the federalist papers in 1787 and 1788. According to Doc. C, and Federalist paper number 51,” Constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices is in such a manner… check on the other.” James Madison, is explaining how the government got split into three branches. Next he explained that the three branches were framed/setup to check on each other…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Imagine oneself back at the constitutional convention in seventeen eighty-seven. All of the brightest minds and most respected people in one place, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in the southeast of the state, near New York. Because it is May, and just beginning to be summer, it is hot, and because all the windows are closed in the interest of secrecy, it is stifling as well. Fifty-five well known thinkers of the age, all white males, have come. They range in age from James Madison, an up-and-comer and a prodigy who is twenty five to Benjamin Franklin, a wise, venerable, learned man who is eighty one. Delegates from eleven states are present, New Hampshire not turning up until July, and Rhode Island not at all, thinking to veto the proceedings by their absence. The problem that had caused these proceedings was that the Articles of Confederation, the current system of government was too weak. although the Northwest Ordinance resulted of it, and it fixed the fear of a strong central government and dominance by large states, there were unfair competition among states, unenforceable trade agreements, no power over states governments, no president, no judicial branch and the government could not pay debts because they could not force states to pay taxes. As the cons out-weighed the pros, it was clear that something had to be done. The framers decided to create a new government completely. The question was; How do we give the government the power it needs while preventing tyranny? This essay will address the many and varied was the constitution guards against tyranny. In this essay, the word tyranny refers to James Madison’s definition, which states, “The accumulation of all powers…in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many (is) the very definition of tyranny.” (James Madison, Federalist Paper #47, Hook Document). The constitution addresses tyranny in four main ways: the balance of powers between national and state…

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Abraham Lincoln was Born on February 12, 1809 in Kentucky. Lincoln Died on April 15, 1865 at the age of 65 Lincoln’s Formal education was limited to 18 months of schooling. Prior to politics Lincoln was a lawyer Lincoln served as an Illinois state legislator, member of the House of Representatives and was an unsuccessful candidate for the Senate. Elected President in 1860; Lincoln served from 1861-1865 as the 16th President of the United States.…

    • 5601 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the revolutionary war between the Americas and Great Britain came to an end in 1783, the people who lived in the American nation faced a difficulty. As they have just recovered from the unjust use of governmental power by the British, they had to find ways to guard the nation from the possibility of tyranny reoccurring. It is important to learn about how the constitution they developed helped guard against tyranny since it is a big part of the United States history, and it helps to know why the Americans made the decisions that they made. The actions the constitution took to guard against tyranny were, developing federalism, separating the power, checks and balances and developing a big state vs. small state compromise. Through the constitution…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1660, the British came back to England after 100 years. The British had abandoned the colonists and when they came back they would tax them and make them only trade with them. The British had the power to make the colonists do that , so technically they the British had the power to control them as well as they had the power to punish them. This is an example of tyranny because the British had absolute power to tell the colonists what to do. Their was about to be a tyranny in the constitution but, to avoid it the framers used federalism, separating federal powers, checks & balances , and small/large state compromise.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In May, 1787, 55 men from 11 states gathered in Philadelphia for the Constitutional Convention. The object of the meeting was to frame a government that was strong enough to hold the states and people together, but also could guard against tyranny. At the time, the Articles of Confederation was in use, but it wasn’t working. So the framers were stuck with a big question. How could the new constitution guard against tyranny? Now, we know that the constitution guards against tyranny because it has federalism, checks and balances, separation of powers, and how representation is set up.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What do you think tyranny means? When we think of tyranny, we consider its harsh absolute power in the hands of one individual, like King George III. In James Madison's argument for his support of the Constitution he wrote that "The accumulation of all power... in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many is the very definition of tyranny." In 1787, the framers came together in Philadelphia to write the Constitution to help guard against tyranny. The Constitution guarded against tyranny in several ways which were federalism, separation of power, checks and balances, and big states versus small states.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our founding father, Patrick Henry, said, “The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government — lest it come to dominate our lives and interests.” Our founding fathers created a strong government for the people of the United States in order to protect their rights. They established a framework that our contemporary government is supposed to adhere to. Today, the American government has drifted away from the ideas embedded in our Constitution. The contemporary American government fails to work the way our founding fathers intended because of the representative government we have today.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some states would not abide by all of the federal government laws that where set or make their own laws that interfered with ones that were made. The Public Administration Quarterly said “The constitutions provided for varying degrees of decentralization. Nome, however, were as decentralized as the national government under the Articles. In all states, there was an executive in some form and in New York, Massachusetts, and Hew Hampshire he was elected by the people at large. Other states, however, provided for an executive chosen by a legislature or legislatively appointed body. In most states, the executive was essentially part of the legislature.” The US Constitution divides power between the Federal government and state governments. Giving certain power to the federal government to keep the country in stability to grow in the future like declare war on another country or treaties so the entire country stays on one side of the decision. When the federal government makes a law, the states have to follow it and change any laws that has conflict with it to fit within the parameters of the law. The States have reserved powers with are specifically for the states to regulate. This was the tenth amendment to the constitution and has similar tis to the Articles of…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    SEPARATION OF POWERS

    • 2870 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The man object behind the theory of separation of powers is to protect the people again capricious tyrannical and whimsical powers of the State.…

    • 2870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the quotation above show that separations of power have two levels, for the first level is in the federal government have three branches which are Legislature, Judiciary and Executive that different with each other but it actually involved each…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Wesley Smith, “The doctrine of separation of powers is a general technique for limiting the ability of government officials to wield excessive powers to the detriment of citizens’ rights. The three types of power (the legislative, executive and judicial) should be distributed amongst three distinct branches of government; no branch should exercise more than one variety of function, and no person should belong to more than one branch. Each branch is balanced by the others, some kind of parity is established between them.”[1]…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Doctrine Of Separation

    • 1264 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Doctrine of Separation of Powers is widely used in many democracies around the world. It is based on the idea that in order to maintain civil liberty, there is a need to separate the institutions that make the law, those that execute it, and those which adjudicate the law. The concept was defined by Charles de Secondat, Baron de Montesquieu in Spirit of Laws1, this framework allows checks and balances in the system, with power divided into three branches of government ensuring that no individual branch is able to wield complete power, nor abuse it, thus protecting the liberty of the citizens.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays