Preview

How the Indian Removal Act Was Unjust

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
386 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How the Indian Removal Act Was Unjust
it is mainly unconstitutional due to that fact of America's "Manifest Destiny". As American's greed for more land, Indians are pushed further and further west. "This desire for Indian lands was also abetted by the Indian hating mentallity that was peculiar to some American frontiersman. " The Indian Removal itself is unconstitutional due to that fact that Indians were never truly considered Americans or settlers. They had seeked help from the newly appointed president Andrew Jackson but he would not interfere with the lawful prerogatives of the state of Georgia.

Indian Removal was designed to push Native Americans off their tribal lands.
Indian Removal catered to the demands of white settlers who wanted to take over desirable tribal lands such as the fertile farmlands controlled by Native American nations in the American southeast. And while the act was theoretically voluntary, many Native Americans were coerced, forced, and manipulated into giving up their land.

The primary target of the Indian Removal Act were the so-called “five civilized tribes,” the Cherokee, Muscogee, Choctaw, Seminole, and Chicasaw, who controlled huge swaths of land in areas like Florida and Georgia. These tribes had tried a variety of tactics to hold on to their land, including assimilating and adopting European habits, which is why they were known as “civilized.”

Some tribes did voluntary give up their lands under the Indian Removal Act, only to find that when they relocated to the west, the land they received in exchange was of poor quality, and was not comparable to the rich, fertile land they had been living on for centuries. Other tribes were subjected to coercion and manipulation by government officials who forced them to give up their land. Tens of thousands of Native Americans, most notably members of the Cherokee Nation, were forcibly removed and marched to regions like Oklahoma in the Trail of Tears in the 1830s, and many died along the way.

Under the Indian Removal

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Indian Removal Act went against the indian’s rights, and the indians did not want to move off their land. The Indians were forced off their land because of the Indian Removal Act. The Cherokee tried to go to court to fight the Indian Removal Act, explaining that the act was against their rights. The Cherokee did lose, and eventually were forced to follow the Indian Removal Act. The Native Americans that were moved also had rights to original land they lived on. For example, the Cherokee had a written constitution that explained that the Cherokee had full control of the land. That did…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Indian Removal act of 1830 was in short; an act made law by Andrew Jackson relocating many Native American tribes west of the Mississippi river to unsettled lands. This would open up safer territory for those looking to colonize further west than the original thirteen colonies. Here are four men’s messages regarding the act that gives further insight into it all.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unfortunately, despite how precisely Indians followed white men’s laws and requirements, the Indian Removal would have eventually transpired. The Five Civilized Tribes shed their Indian traditions and culture to take on the Americans way of life. Indians not only adopted principles in government and agriculture, but also religiously. Despite all of this, whites still wanted to kick Indians out of their lands in order to bring profit to themselves. Even the national government could not terminate the Indian Removal. Through both the United States Constitution and Worcester v. Georgia, the national government declared that states could not operate the removal of Indians. All of this, illustrates the inhumanity and lack of compassion whites had…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cherokee Removal is a brief history with documents by Theda Perdue and Michael Green. In 1838-1839 the US troops expelled the Cherokee Indians from their ancestral homeland in the Southeast and removed them to the Indian Territory in what is now Oklahoma. The removal of the Cherokees was a product of the demand for land during the growth of cotton agriculture in the Southeast, the discovery of gold on the Cherokees land, and the racial prejudice that many white southerners had toward the Indians.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, the Indian Removal Act of 1830 should not be justified because the Americans broke treaties and cheated the Indians in deals, the Americans gave the Indians bad land, and the Indians were there first. The had a peaceful life, then the Americans came in and messed it…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Removal Act DBQ

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Since the colonization of America, there have been tensions and confrontations between white settlers and Native Americans over territory and civilization. President Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act in 1830, allowing him to communicate with Native American tribal leaders in order to negotiate their voluntary relocation to Federal reservations west of the Mississippi River. When several tribes refused to relocate, the conflict turned violent and was conducted through the use of militias and military force. Due to this violent conflict and the subsequent relocation of hundreds of thousands of Native Americans, relations between Native Americans and the United States Government have since been strained. Native Americans continually experience higher rates of poverty, fewer opportunities for educational advancement, higher rates of physical and mental illness, as well as general discrimination through social systems and policy. Strained relationships, societal, and economic opportunities have weakened and are less readily available to Native Americans, all factors that can be traced back to the Indian Removal Act.…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Indian Removal Act Dbq

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act authorized the president to grant unsettled lands west of the Mississippi in exchange for Indian lands within existing state borders…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cherokee Tribe Case Study

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    over the land and people within its borders. In section eight of the Georgia State Assembly, it states,”…that it shall not be lawful for any person or body of persons…to prevent any Indian of said nation residing within the chartered limits of this state, from enrolling as an emigrant…”.2 Not even congress would stand up against Georgia, they just let them do what they pleased.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Andrew Jackson’s Indian removal policy in the 1830’s raised many questions as to whether or not it was constitutional. To start off the Indian removal policy was a law that authorized the president to negotiate with southern tribes for them to remove themselves to federal territory west of the Mississippi river in return for their native land that they occupied. Although, it was basically mandatory that the indians move from their lands there were different responses to the removal policy. One response was from the southerners who wanted to occupy the lands that the indians were on and the other was from the christian missionaries who felt the need to support the indians right to the land and the indians who lived on the lands who…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Native Americans were forced out of the land by treaties created by American leaders and the spokesperson for the native Americans they wanted to ensure peace and honesty between the two groups for the native Americans land to continue the trade for fur without any problems or difficulties many Americans were eager to stake claim on the native Americans territories. This erupted in many attacks and confrontations. The treaty convinced the native Americans to give, transfer, yield broad huge amounts of land to the U.S. government. To understand the point or reasons behind the treaty was that native Americans were seasonal hunters that only hunted for game and it was not necessary for them to have land. These reasons were fictional because many…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was a policy established through congress, that allowed the federal government to move the Native Americans out of their lands further west. When white Georgians discovered gold in western Georgia, they requested that the Cherokee Natives be removed so a gold mine could be established. In the Cherokee v. Georgia case, the Cherokee were found, by the Supreme Court, to have their own sovereignty and that the U.S state could not interfere with their land without permission. However, president Jackson disregarded the Supreme Courts decision and revoked the the Cherokee's rights to their land and began their removal. The Nation was forced to travel one thousand miles, leaving Georgia for Oklahoma on a grueling walk…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever made a trade that was fair to you, but unfair to someone else or vice versa. Well, you're not the only one. On May 28, 1830 there was an act signed that stated that the Congress and Government could trade and negotiate for their land in return for the land on the west side of the Mississippi River. John Ross a Cherokee chief, Andrew Jackson the president, and the congress were all involved in the signing of this act. The Congress and the other people involved on the government side wanted the land because they had more access to it and had better quality than the previous land. “The bold effort the president Central Bank had made to control the government… are but premonitions of the fate that await the American people should they be deluded…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ¨All men are created equal,¨ according to the Declaration of Independence. But, based on the government’s actions, this was not the case when it came to Indian Removal. When the government issued the Indian Removal act in 1830, there were two clear sides: one that supported it, and one that despised it. After the Supreme Court ruled against it, the wrongness of it became manifest. However, it still continued. The United States was not justified in enabling the Indian Removal Act.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Longing to gain money and resources in the United States, white settlers grew envious of the remaining acreage owned by the Native Americans. In an attempt to claim the land as their own, the U.S. government announced the Indian Removal Act of 1830 which authorized the exchange of southern Indian territory to land owned by the Europeans West of the Mississippi River (“Indian Treaties and the Removal Act of 1830”). The Indian Removal Act was passed to open up for settlement those lands still held by Indians in states east of the Mississippi River, primarily Georgia, Tennessee, Alabama, Mississippi, North Carolina, and others. Jackson declared that removal would “incalculably strengthen the southwestern frontier.” Clearing Alabama and Mississippi of their Indian populations, he said, would “enable those states to advance rapidly in population, wealth, and power” (“President Andrew Jackson”). White inhabitants of Georgia were particularly anxious to have the Cherokees removed from the state because gold had been discovered on tribal lands. Violence was commonplace in Georgia, and in all likelihood, a portion of the tribe would have been decimated if they had not been…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Indian Removal Act

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Even though we are settled here, all this land originally the Indians’ and with this act, we are kicking them off their own land. John Marshall stated, “The Choctaw and Creek were treated horrendously when they moved to the Indian Territory. Their horses were stolen and hundreds died for malnutrition.” (Document 2). The Choctaw and the Creek were treated really badly. They suffered a lot and some of them even died. Honestly, the Cherokee are being smart in not moving to the Indian Territory because they know that they will be treated the same way. The very little trust that the Cherokees had in us is now lost. Mr. Marshall also states, “In the case of Worchester vs. Georgia (1832), the U.S Supreme court ruled that the state of Georgia could not force the Cherokee off their land.” (Document 2). President Jackson is going against the law by supporting the Indian Removal Act. This does not show good presidency. He’s taking hasty decisions because of his bad past with the Indians. The Cherokees are not at fault. If they want to follow their traditions and still live in Georgia, fine. I don’t see why any American has an objection with the Indians staying there not bothering us and we not bothering them. They have a right to this land. Let them…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays