For a good portion of the period, “the British Army of 1815 had been honed by years of active confrontation and battle, most recently with France, in the Revolutionary and Napoleonic wars” (Knowles). Britain, in this bogging war with France, can help to explain why Britain saw the extensive organization of her army for reasons other than colony control. During this war, Britain’s manpower—the number of people, in this case, able to fight in the army—drastically changed. Before France attacked, “the [British] army was relatively small.just 45,000 men, two thirds of whom were stationed abroad. They had recruiting issues, and the rank and file were notoriously those who had few other choices.”…
The Crimean war was fought by Russia and an alliance of Britain, France, Prussia, Austria and the Ottoman Empire from 1853 to 1856. Due to the decline of the Ottoman Empire, each country was competing for influence in the Middle East, with Russia attempting to gain access to its seas. In the end Russia was vastly overpowered, leading Alexander II to speedily begin peace talks, the Treaty of Paris bringing an end to the bloodshed. The defeat of the war highlighted the fact that Russia had lost its dominance as a military power, having had its warships banned from the Black Sea. Why such a vast country with a strong military tradition lost was due to the traditional values of Russia, like the out-dated military manoeuvres, the out-dated bayonet against the newest rifles, the inability to support the war effort and the undersupplied armies due to a lack of transport. Russian troops weren’t equipped to fight against the advanced weapons of the French and British, when their ammunition ran out they were unable to restock since there was no form of transport other than ox drawn carts. Proof of Russian backwardness was exemplified here; Russia’s serfdom based economy was unable to support the cost of the war, influencing Alexander II greatly to change.…
“The War of 1812: A Forgotten Conflict” written by Donald R. Hickey tells the story of the second and last battle between America and Britain. The history book was published in the year 1989 which contains 480 pages. The book was published at the University of Illinois Press and this book is even a Bicentennial edition. Donald R. Hickey mostly focuses on the land battles, politics, and struggles armies had to go through. After reading this book, I determined the true meaning behind Hickey’s book “The War of 1812: A Forgotten Conflict”.…
He found it difficult to be innovative and inventive in warfare, and was not receptive to new ideas or strategies. Over his tenure as leader of the army, he also failed to introduce new training methods, and often made judgement errors, including underestimating the amount of supplies that would be needed. Napoleon also found it difficult to accept advice from others who knew better, and often failed to inform his senior officers of what he was planning to do on campaign, and insisted on maintaining all of the power, so they weren’t able to make any of the decisions. In his earlier campaigns, this had been less of an issue, as his armies were often small, but when leading armies of hundreds of thousands of men it was almost impossible for him to maintain control over the entirety of the decisions that needed to be…
High school students should read this book as they begin to establish a basic level of understanding of these historical events. College students can use this text to challenge their established beliefs and grow their knowledge of the subject matter by gaining a new and exciting perspective. Teachers and professors can gain to learn more about the subject so that they may foster engaging debates and discussion in class on the course material. While this book challenges the accuracy or lack-thereof, of a specific historical event, it subsequently forces us as student, teachers and historians to view all events in history with a healthy sense of…
Understanding the Battle of Waterloo is important to know, because it shows that bad decision making and bad intelligence reporting can lead to one's defeat. Since 1804, Napoleon was trying to create his own empire over Europe. He was defeated in 1805 by the British, but he continued to move forward across Europe before being forced to surrender. He returned to Paris in March 1815, prompting Britain, Prussia, Russia and Austria to declare war. Napoleon invaded Belgium in June, attempting to take over Brussels. He sent his men to engage Wellington, also sending a battalion against General Blucher's Prussian army. Blucher decided to retreat as Wellington's army wasn't holding the front line against Napoleon's army. A decisive battle is now set…
The withdrawal of the Russian army “[prompted] the citizens of Moscow to [begin] a massive and panicked exodus” (Geographia). When Napoleon arrived, he found the city to be empty of people and lacking in supplies. What made things worse was that during that night, “fires broke out in the city and by the next day the French were lacking shelter as well” (Geographia). Napoleon decided to wait in Moscow for Alexander to surrender, but after a month of no surrender, Napoleon decided to retreat. Sadly it was too late as Napoleon had over stayed his welcome in Moscow and Russia’s cruel winter had set…
It took the USA 4 years to win the Civil War because of the changing nature of warfare. This meant that Napoleonic decisive battle could no longer be applied and so their strategy had to change. The changing nature of warfare was the most important factor in the war going on for as long as it did, making it more significant than the poor initial US strategy, the contributions of Lee, and the strengths of the CSA at the beginning of the war.…
Throughout history, many substantial wars have been disputed on various types of terrain around the world. Halvard Bugaug and Scott Gates support this and have made a claim in the article, “The Geography of Civil War”, that geographical factors play a critical role in determining how a war is fought and who will prevail. The two most important factors they give are terrain and climate. In the article, Bugaug and Gates both reference the book History of Warfare, written by John Keegan, to give examples of how these factors effect wars. Keegan gives many samples of previous generals who have ignored these factors and lead to their catastrophic downfall. One commonly known example given is the French army lead by Napoleon. Napoleon lead his fearfully large army into Russia, not taking into account Russia's fiercely cold weather. Although they fought, and won, battles located in Russia, the cold weather began to take its toll on Napoleon's army, causing them to be greatly weakened. This weakened state of his army, in turn, lead to the French being defeated…
On 31 December 1810, the Czar of Russia issued a ukase, which broke Russia's alliance with France and threatened to destroy Napoleon's Continental System and his strategy of economic warfare against England. Napoleon immediately began organizing a new Grande Armee large enough to ensure an overwhelming victory over the army of the Czar. Napoleon had immense resources at his disposal. His influence collected men and materiel from across Europe, including France, Belgium, Holland, Germany, Italy, Prus-sia, Austria, Denmark, Switzerland, and the Grand Duchy of Warsaw. Although sources differ, Connelly declares that, "by June 1812, Napoleon had a field army of 611,000 men with 2000 guns and 250,000 horses."…
Are you sitting comfortably? The constantly changing fashionable take on war of 1812 demonstrates the depth of the subject. Though war of 1812 is a favourite topic of discussion amongst monarchs, presidents and dictators, war of 1812 is not given the credit if deserves for inspiring many of the worlds famous painters. Crossing many cultural barriers it still draws remarks such as 'I wouldn't touch it with a barge pole' and 'i'd rather eat wasps' from the easily lead, trapped by their infamous history. Though I would rather be in bed I will now examine the primary causes of war of 1812.…
In June of 1812, Napoleon began his deadly Russian campaign, a landmark in the history of the caustic potential of warfare. All mainland Europe was under his control, and the invasion of Russia was an effort to force Tsar Alexander planned once again to the terms of a treaty that Napoleon had enforced upon him four years earlier. Having collected nearly half a million soldiers, from France as well as all of the states of Europe, Napoleon entered Russia at the lead of the largest army ever seen. The Russians, under the power of Marshal Kutuzov, could not hope to defeat him in a direct conflict.…
The War of 1812 was arguably one of the strangest wars in history for many reasons. The accounts of racism with service in the army, the fact that it was three different wars fought on three separate fronts, and the apparent uneven military situation is among many other contributing factors. North American marked the bicentennial of this war 5 years ago in 2012. Setting a moment aside to understand various elements such as why the war began, those who supported and opposed the war altogether, and understand the reasons for their stance is notably worth it!…
The Breakdown of Napoleon’s Russian Battle Dustin CM412 The Breakdown of Napoleon’s Russian Battle Napoleon Bonaparte was outwardly unconquerable. Beneath his control, the Grande Army had dominated a large portion of Europe, and was viewed by others as a strict rival. Despite the fact off all this, Napoleon completed a deadly error: he entered Russia. Of the 600,000 troops that reached the Russian boundary, only 100,000 made it out (Moore, Online).…
Cited: Smitha, Frank. "Napoleon 's Wars, Mistakes and Fall." fsmitha.com. Frank E. Smitha, n.d. Web. 17 Apr…