Preview

How to Brief a Case

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
843 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How to Brief a Case
HOW TO BRIEF A CASE
Below I have sketched in the beginnings of a brief as a format. This time-honored method of analysis is the basic unit of law school instruction and so most judicial opinions are written to conform to this approach. Knowing the rules makes watching the game so much more interesting. Start with the name of the Case which is called the “style” of the case.
PERLA GRAFF v. JAY L. GRAFF, 569 So. 2d 811, Fla. 1st Dist. Ct. App. (1990). First is the case name, followed by the citation which tells where you can find the hard copy of this case. This particular case is found in Volume 569 of the Southern Reporter, Second Series at page 811 in an opinion written by the First District Court of Appeals for Florida in 1990.
FACTS: (In this section you want to state the circumstances and events that led to the plaintiff suing the defendant as well as any facts relevant to the issue(s).) The parties were married for over 13 years, but, prior to the marriage the Husband purchased a home solely in his name. Thirteen years into the marriage, and for survivorship purposes only, the Husband deeded the property to both he and his wife as tenants by the entireties. Additionally, the parties used their joint checking account to make the mortgage payments and the parties used marital monies to add a pool and replace the roof. The Husband testified that he purchased the home for $48,000.00 prior to the marriage and that at the time of the divorce the home’s value was between $100,000.00 and $110,000.00.
ISSUE: (In this section you want to state the specific legal question(s) raised in the case. Look at the overall question(s) to be resolved by the court. Sometimes you will have more than one question, but, you want to state your issue as a question or begin your issue with the word ‘whether’) Whether the increased value of the marital home was a marital asset and therefore whether the Wife was entitled to equitable distribution of that value.
HOLDING:

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The couple alleged error in the refusal of the court to make effective their claim that the mortgage was obtained by a fraudulent sale, and that they should be allowed…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (Cheeseman2013) In the case of Cunningham v. Hastings, Mr. Hastings and Mrs. Cunningham, was an unmarried couple, purchased a home together. Mr. Hastings put $45,000 down payment toward the home out of his pocket. When it came to how the deed established the deed stated Hastings Cunningham as joint tenants with the right of survivorship. The couple occupied the property jointly. When the relationship between the two ended, Mr. Hastings seized sole possession of the property. Mrs. Cunningham filed a complaint seeking partition of the real estate. Based on its determination that the property could not be split, the trial court ordered it to be sold. The trial court further ordered that $45,000 of the sale proceeds be paid to Mr. Hastings to reimburse…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief The Day After

    • 994 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Over the last 18 months the average occupancy at Riley Memorial Hospital had fallen. This was certainly a cause for concern for Charlie and the hospital board. As a result, 134 employees were laid off to keep the hospital out of the red. This led to the closing of two specialized nursing units, which had a few trustees and several physicians extremely upset with the board’s decision. Charlie’s relationship with the board and medical staff had changed over time because of his inability to control the number of matters of importance due to a changing external environment. Consequently, Charlie lost his ability to make necessary decisions in a timely manner. With four physicians on the board, Charlie met with resistance when he tried to prepare the board for the economic downturn and the publics decline in the use of physicians and hospitals. Furthermore, Charlie met with resistance once again when he tried to review a proposed contract submitted by a health maintenance organization with the board. Instead of listening to what Charlie had to say, the four physicians persuaded the board to support private practitioners and engage in fee-for-service medicine. The board assured Charlie that the physicians would keep the hospitals needs and interests above those of the medical staff. Charlie appointed Bill Handy as the COO of Riley Memorial Hospital and turned over all internal operations to him. Although this new appointment was fully endorsed by the board, it was never understood or accepted by many of the physicians. The physicians at Riley Memorial Hospital considered Charlie’s role to primarily serve the interests of the medical staff. Many physicians believed Charlie did…

    • 994 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief No 1

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plaintiff and Defendant: The plaintiff/appellant is Harvestons Securities, Inc. The defendant/appellee is Narnia Investments, Ltd.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    FACTS: The parties were married on March 1, 1959. Plaintiff had a 15 year old daughter by a previous marriage. It was planned that she would live with them, as well as agreed upon that after marriage the defendant’s mother from Hungary would be moved in with them (September 11, 1964). Defendant testified that he would not have married plaintiff if his mother could not live with them. Within a very short time after the arrival of the mother-in-law, the incompatibility between her and the plaintiff caused a disintegration of the marriage. After a psychologist and counselor were called upon, the plaintiff gave the defendant an ultimatum of living with her or his mother and the defendant chose his mother. Plaintiff moved out with daughters on July 9, 1965. Both plaintiff and defendant said they would take the other back upon submission of the other’s stance. Plaintiff sued her husband for maintenance and support for herself and the infant child of their marriage. The Chancery Division entered judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appealed.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Title of Case: Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC, Petitioner v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc., et al. 128 S. Ct. 761 (2008)…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Brief

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Facts: In 1998, investigative reporting team, Jane Akre and her husband Steve Wilson, brought suit against their employer WVTV, a subsidiary of Fox TV, under violation of Florida’s whistle-blower statutes. They argued that the station had terminated their employment under grounds of retaliation because the team refused to suppress and distort the contents of a story regarding the controversial Bovine Growth Hormone in Florida’s cattle. Additional claims also brought forth included declaratory relief and breach of contract. After a four-week trial, a jury found against Wilson on all of his claims. Akre decided to drop allegations concerning declaratory relief and the court allowed for continuance based on her whistle-blower claims. The jury granted a monetary award of $425,000 in damages to Akre based on retaliation claims established by whistle-blower statute.…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Brief

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Michael Huck was discriminated because he was on a wheelchair and didn’t get the same benefit as other humans who are in the back rows. He didn’t have the choice of seats which was available to others so basically for him to watch a movie; he would have to sit in the front row of the theatre. They also said if he wanted to sit at the back rows, he would have to get up but he’s a disability person. He didn’t have the opportunity like others.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Further, the court properly denied that part of defendant's motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint because defendant failed to establish his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see, Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853). It is well settled that nonvested deferred compensation is marital property subject to equitable distribution (see, Burns v Burns, 84 NY2d 369, 376) and thus, contrary to defendant's contention, plaintiff had an interest in the Deferred Compensation Agreement when defendant and [*881] his partners terminated it.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The discovery of facts that demonstrate that a valid warrant was unnecessarily broad does not retroactively invalidate the warrant.…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Justin King Answer

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1. Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was and is a resident of the County of…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    (UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jerry Alfred WHITWORTH, Defendant-Appellant.,…

    • 2825 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Applications for asylum may not be made against the wishes of a parent of a child that lacks the mental capacity to request asylum and a third party cannot speak on behalf of a minor because it is the right of a…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sandra Jones

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. The plaintiff in this case is Sandra Jones, and the defendant is Winnie Tsige. What is case is about is Winnie Tsige, has been surreptitiously looking at Sandra Jones banking records.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    FACTS Rumarson Technologies, Inc. (RTI) sued Robert and Percy Helmer to collect from them personally $24,965 owed to it by Event Marketing, Inc. (EMI) when EMI's check to pay RTI bounced. Robert and Percy Helmer were authorized signatories on EMI's corporate account, and they signed the check. RTI argued that as signatories they could be held personally liable. The lower court agreed and ruled in favor of RTI holding the Helmers liable. The Helmers appealed. Also of note, is that check was dated 1998 although there is some non-material dispute as to whether it was August 14, 1998, or on or around July 13, 1998.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics