Preview

How Xerxes Dealt with the Revolts.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
911 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Xerxes Dealt with the Revolts.
How did Xerxes deal wit the revolts in the Persian Empire?

One of the great challenges faced by Xerxes during his time as ruler of the Persian Empire, was the method by which the revolts in both Egypt and Babylon would be dealt with. Essentially, he dealt with the revolts in two different ways; firstly using his military force to quickly and decisively quell the revolts; which were followed by either political or administrative reforms (or a combination of both). These methods reflected his ability to administer the grandeur that was Persia.

Following Darius' death, Xerxes was now tasked with quelling the revolt of the Satrapy of Egypt. Cook indirectly implies that this rebellion was instigated due to the raised taxation imposed by Darius, whilst suggesting that the removal of skilled workers, and a corrupt method of Persian administration led to the revolt. Irrespective of the cause, Herodotus accounts for Xerxes quelling of the revolt, noting that: Xerxes sent in an army, crushing the rebellion, reducing the country to a “condition of worse servitude than before” and mentions his brother's appointment as Satrap. Herodotus says that the Egyptians were heavily punished, and evidence can be seen from this coming from the Satrap Stella (311BC), describing the confiscation of the Temple of Bute's land by Xerxes resulting in his subsequent naming as “the wicked man” - however it should be noted that Bresciani states this title actually refers to Artaxerxes III. Herodotus view is further reinforced by the lack of archaeological evidence commissioned by Xerxes within Egyptian lands, lending to his view that the Egyptians were treated harshly by Xerxes. Despite this, it is known that Herodotus has used Egyptian sources in his accumulation of Persian information, from which it can be seen as bias from the Egyptians being reflected in his works. This view is contested by evidence such as the Aqihar Scoll, which states that trade between the two countries flourished

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ruling for 11 years, Seti I, whose throne name was Menmaatre Seti, or “Established is the Justice of Re,” was a somewhat obscure yet important pharaoh of Egypt's 19th Dynasty. He was a great builder, with the Hypostyle Hall at Karnak and the Temple at Abydos being some of his greatest feats in this field. In contrast, he was a fierce warrior, leading many campaigns into Syria and Lybia, and most notably capturing the strategic Syrian city of Kadesh. But most importantly to ancient Egypt as we know it, he was known as the “Repeater of Births” for his great restoration of the country. Ancient Egypt may not have thrived without Seti I ruling for 11 years.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Flavius Valerius Aurelius Constantinus Augustus was one of few who went to the extremes of killing his own family members just to keep his new booming Empire up and running. Constantine ruled from 306 A.D. until 337 A.D. During Constantine the Great’s thirty-one years of ruling, he influenced the Roman Empire that affected the Roman people in a virtuous way. He strengthened Christianity in Rome and was a martyr in making Christianity a respected religion, he created economic reforms that helped the common people, and crafted impressive structures throughout the Empire.…

    • 2306 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Xerxes’ had several brothers both of half and of blood, including Artobazanes, Darius’ eldest son, and Ariamenes, also older than Xerxes; two of which had more significantly contested against him in the throne. Artobazanes was Darius’ apparent successor in 507BC, and when the decision was changed after time, argument broke out between supporters of Xerxes and that of Artobazanes over the succession. From the harem inscription by Xerxes’ himself, he states “other sons of Darius there were but…my father named me greatest after himself,” verifying for previous contenders for…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Xerxes followed the same pattern of appointing a mixed government of local and Persian rulers and to grant local independence to the rulers. However, in his religious policies Xerxes differed from Darius. Darius was a strict follower of Zoroastrianism and constantly reminds the will and favour of Ahuramazda and Arta behind his every action. There is no evidence that Darius ever tried to force his beliefs on the people of his empire, and he is generally considered a generous ruler in the matters of religious freedom. On the other hand, Xerxes, in one of his inscriptions, says “… and in one of these countries, there places where false gods were worshipped. Afterward, with the favour of Ahuramazda, I destroyed the sanctuaries of the demons and I declared that demons should not be worshipped. Where before demons were worshipped, I worshipped Ahuramazda...” (Kent, XPh). This says this Xerxes was forcing his beliefs on part of his population. The Daevas inscription gave strong evidence that Xerxes was a follower of Zoroastrian teaching and the god Ahuramazda. Xerxes was against the Daevas, he had no tolerance towards people who worshiped…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Persia’s government ruled like the Mesopotamian kingdoms with a hereditary monarchy. The land was split into twenty-nine satrapies that were allowed to self-govern themselves, which gave these people more freedom. With the freedom to self-govern, the satrapies did not revolt and gave the Persian government less to worry about. Even though they each were allowed to govern themselves, the king had power of them by appointing a secretary and a military commander to each satrapy. The king also chose inspectors to go to different satrapies and report on each one so the empire was all connected.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In both The Epic of Gilgamesh and The Essential Odyssey, the actions of key individuals are continuously being placed under question. As a result, it can be very difficult to understand what can be considered just in situations. I will first demonstrate how the characters in both of these texts were granted approval and gained support from either their gods or community leaders. I will then analyze how even though these individuals went against other groups of people, their actions were still just because of the people that they received approval from. Finally, I will argue the ability that some people have over others and how that, in turn, impacts how a situation is perceived.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Odysseus put himself on the line to protect his men day in and day out. He knew about the Sirens and how perilous they are “ Then all at once the wind fell, and a calm came over all the sea, as though some power lulled the swell.” (Homer, The Odyssey part 2). The Sirens make men jump off their ship if they hear the beautiful breathtaking voices. Odysseus had his men tie him up to a pole on the ship and made his men put wax in their ears so they don’t hear the voices. His men would know when it was safe to take out the wax when Odysseus calms down and doesn’t move or do actions like he want’s to jump off the ship. This shows an infinite amount of leadership and bravery from Odysseus because he sacrificed himself for the good of his men. He…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cyrus the Shepherd

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Persia "Cyrus the Shepherd" invited a newer, more sophisticated government that distinguished it from the previous foundation civilization. In this new government, a centralized bureaucracy ruled, meaning that while Cyrus was the king and Persepolis was the capital a highly staffed team helped run the empire. Since the Persian Empire was so large, Cyrus broke it up into many distinct sections called satraps, which had considerable local autonomy (power). In other words, not only was there a strong central government but there was also bureaucrats who helped rule and maintain order in provinces throughout the empire. The Persian Empire, in addition, was very diverse, containing many different religions and ethnicities. Overall, the Persian Emperors were very tolerant and respected all peoples. The big religion you should know, however, is Zoroastrianism. Many historians consider this the first Monotheistic faith. Technologically, the Persians had Qantas which were sophisticated irrigation dams. Of course, metallurgy was still an integral part of technological life.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Persian had a strong government at the heart of its driving force. The Federalistic idea of the people kept the empire together during times of peace and times of war. They did everything for ‘Mother Persia’ and did so to keep their freedom. Their freedom in government they could rural over civil affairs and command the army in war. Kings could then appoint a secretary and military commander in each satrapy, or district. These districts is what kept the large empire even more tightly together. Each of these empires had a governor, or Satrap. Also each satrapy was appointed an inspector to report on what has going on in each. Their success was put on the royal roads that could carry them from one side to the other in less than two weeks --an accomplishment in that day-- made swift travel and greater messaging for the empire. There government worked well and is glue that kept the empire together and kept it alive for hundreds of years.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Spartacus was a leader under the old Roman Republic. He is known for starting a rebellion against the Roman Empire in the Third Servile War. There are thoughts that have not been confirmed to this very day but one thing is for sure, Spartacus was able to share a vision with the slaves during the ancient times. There are arguments when it comes to the origins of him. Ancient historians believed that he was Thracian. A lot of authors have closed him in on so many origins that it became hard to keep track of them. Although, he is known to the world as a Thracian who later received training from the Roman army and was then sold to slavery.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Odysseus: A Great Leader

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What do you think Odysseus personality traits are? Odysseus has many positive character traits that show up in the story many times. These traits include being a good leader, being smart/clever, and caring.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Xerxes wanted his people to follow his beliefs for expansion, and he allowed others to speak their mind after his proposition. Herodotus explained in history that not every Persian member of the Empire agreed with Xerxes proposition. Some Persians believed the Greeks did not deserve a free escape from their aid to the Ionians, and some believed the invasion would cause more Persian deaths from battle or disasters during the march to Greece. Xerxes heard all of his Persian’s opinions on his plan for invasion, and he ignored the opinions who opposed the march through Europe into Greece. This evidence from Herodotus story shows how Xerxes final decision was leadership through tyranny. His decision to invade was already determined before he allowed his people to speak their mind. This leadership is oppressive and unjust which was much different from the…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Day of Empire Essay

    • 2017 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Amy Chua develops chapter one by introducing the reader to the Achaemenid Empire or Persian Empire, the first hyper power in history, ruling over one third of the world’s population, and a territory more vast than all known empires throughout history. Following the introduction to such an exquisitely large empire, Amy Chua suggests the Persian empire achieved their dominance and maintained it, with one critical strategy: Tolerance. The hearth of the Persian Empire can be derived from the tolerance of Cyrus the Great. Cyrus’ technique for expanding the empire was to conquer, but with peace. Rather than attacking and striking fear into the nearby lands and their residents, Cyrus tolerated the culture, belief and rituals of the residents, which built a favorism towards Cyrus, and an empire, built to last . Cyrus then, left the enormous empire he built to his son, Cambyses who after invading Egypt, continued his father’s policy and tolerated the customs and culture of the local residents. With Cambyses’ conquests of Phoenicia, Libya Egypt and many other cities, the Achaemenid Empire rose to the “worlds greatest naval power.” After the death of Cambyses, a relative named Darius, took over. Building on what Cambyses and Cyrus had accomplished, Darius expanded into India and Eastern Europe and introduced a system of currency, extended/improved communication systems, and formalized taxing. Throughout his ruling, Darius…

    • 2017 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the Epic, Odyssey by Homer Odysseus has to save his men and get them home. Odysseus is a modern day hero hero. He qualifies for the job because first he is brave, cunning, and determined. He made smart decisions and knows how to get out of sticky situations. Second he is brave and he is ready for whatever comes his way. Although the ancient greeks consider odysseus a hero epic hero, according Modern day to Ethos and Logos he fails to measure by modern standards.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Book two of Herodotus’ The Histories contains his account of Egyptian culture, traditions and relations to Greek religion. In particular, passage eighty-six describes the practice of an ancient ritual that has fascinated people for millennia. In this passage, Herodotus describes the ancient Egyptian method for mummification. Being one of the earliest known records, this account of the mummification process immediately retains merit. This does not mean, however that the account is accurate. While some call Herodotus the “Father of History”, others call him the “Father of Lies”.1 This is most likely due inaccuracies found in his Histories and even in book 2.86. Several scholars in the past and present day have either supported his accounts or discredited them as while some passages have been proven correct, others are thought to be inaccurate or misleading. A lover of oral traditions, Herodotus wrote his Histories as if he were speaking them to his audience rather than simply stating his ‘facts’ another possible reason as to the scepticism with which his work is regarded. Though regardless of its flaws, the Histories remains one of the oldest historical accounts ever recorded and by that definition, if nothing else, it deserves consideration. Having lived during the fifth century BCE, Herodotus would have had first-hand experience with Egyptian culture. Book two is particularly interesting, not just because it is a glimpse into the Egyptian culture but also because of the way in which Herodotus relates Egyptian culture to Greek religion.…

    • 1895 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays