Human Resources
Management
Monograph Of Human Resource Management
Base On Three Interviews
INSTRUCTOR: Professor: xxxxxxxxxx
PRESENTED BY: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-1-
29th Nov 2010
Human resources management monograph
CONTENTS
1.
Studied process.............................................................................................. 3
2.
Company background introduction .......................................................... 3
3.
Human resource environment ............................................................ 3
3.1
Organizational structure of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ................................... 4
3.2
SWOT analysis of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ................................................. 5
The Evaluation process analysis of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: ................. 5
4.
4.1
The Evaluation process in xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ............................ 6
4.2
Main actors during the evaluation .......................................................... 7
4.3
Procedure and Tool...................................................................................... 7
4.4
Objects and Aims ............................................................................... 7
Performance Measures Criteria Analysis in xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
5
.......... 8
5.1
From Strategic Congruence Perspective ................................................ 8
5.2
From Reliability Perspective. .................................................................... 9
5.3
From Acceptability Perspective ............................................................... 9
5.4
The limitations of performance Measures ......................................... 10
Conclusions .................................................................................................... 11
6.
6.1
The gaps between the practice an policies. ......................................... 11
References: [2] Rosemary Hill, Jim Stewart, Human resource development in small organizations , Human resource development in small organizations[J], Journal of European Industrial Training, 2000 Vol Schuler; Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 46, 1995. P 65-78. 21. 11. 2010 yyyyyyyy 19. 11. 2010 face to face (skype) 23. 10. 2010 Manager